Realme 12 Pro+ vs Motorola Moto G55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 29, 2024 September 6, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 105.17 cm³ 96.6 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.63 "/g
Weight 196 g 179 g
Height 161.5 mm 161.6 mm
Width 74 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Submarine Blue
  • Navigator Beige
  • Explorer Red
  • Forest Grey
  • Smoky Green
  • Twilight Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.49 "
Resolution 1080 x 2412 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90.4 % 85.3 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 950 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 118.71 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.54 mAh/cm³ 51.76 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 710 IMG BXM-8-256

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Realme 12 Pro+ vs. Motorola Moto G55: A Holistic Comparative Analysis

As a technology researcher, my analysis goes beyond simple spec comparisons to provide a holistic understanding of these devices within the broader mobile landscape.

1. Comprehensive Specification Mapping:

FeatureRealme 12 Pro+Motorola Moto G55Technological ContextInnovation PotentialEcosystem IntegrationPerformance MetricsUser Experience Indicators
Display6.7" AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 950 nits peak6.49" IPS LCD, 120HzAMOLED offers superior contrast, color accuracy, and power efficiency; higher peak brightness enhances outdoor visibility.ModerateHighHighExcellent
Resolution1080 x 2412 (394 ppi)1080 x 2400 (405 ppi)Comparable resolutions; slight ppi difference negligible in real-world usage.LowHighComparableComparable
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm)Snapdragon generally known for better GPU performance; 4nm process suggests better power efficiency for Realme.ModerateHighRealme AdvantageRealme Advantage
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz A78 & 4x1.95 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz A78 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Both offer capable octa-core configurations; slight clock speed differences unlikely to significantly impact daily performance.LowHighComparableComparable
GPUAdreno 710IMG BXM-8-256Adreno GPUs often favored for gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.LowHighRealme AdvantageRealme Advantage
Battery5000 mAh5000 mAhLarge battery capacity becoming standard in mid-range devices, emphasizing all-day usage.LowHighComparableComparable
OSAndroid 14Android 14Both on the latest Android version, ensuring access to new features and security updates.LowHighComparableComparable
Camera (Main)200 MP, OIS50 MPSignificant difference in megapixel count; however, image quality depends on sensor size, processing, and software optimization.HighMediumRealme AdvantageTo be Determined
Video Capabilities4K@30fps (EIS), 1080p@120fps (EIS)1080p@60fpsRealme offers more advanced video recording options, including 4K resolution and higher frame rates with Electronic Image Stabilization.ModerateMediumRealme AdvantageRealme Advantage
ChargingFast chargingFast ChargingWhile both offer fast charging, specific charging speeds (watts) would be needed for a detailed comparison.ModerateHighComparableComparable
Price RangeMediumMediumPrice competitiveness within the same range suggests a focus on value for money.N/AN/AN/AN/A

2. Strategic Technological Insights:

Both devices represent the evolution of the mid-range smartphone segment, offering powerful features at accessible price points. The Realme 12 Pro+ pushes the boundaries with its superior display technology, potentially offering a more immersive visual experience. Its more powerful chipset hints at better performance for demanding tasks and gaming. However, Motorola's consistent focus on clean Android and timely updates could be a differentiating factor for users prioritizing software experience.

3. User Ecosystem Alignment:

Both devices integrate seamlessly into the Android ecosystem, offering access to a vast app library and Google services. The choice between them depends more on individual preferences for specific features like display quality, camera capabilities, and brand reputation.

4. Future-Oriented Decision Framework:

The Realme 12 Pro+'s advanced features, particularly in display and processing power, position it slightly ahead in terms of future-proofing. Its capabilities are likely to remain relevant for a longer period compared to the Moto G55.

My Choice: Realme 12 Pro+

While both phones offer excellent value, I would choose the Realme 12 Pro+. The superior AMOLED display with higher brightness, the potentially stronger Snapdragon processor with Adreno GPU, and the more advanced video recording capabilities are key deciding factors for me. These features contribute to a richer multimedia experience and potentially smoother performance in the long run, aligning with my preference for devices that offer a premium user experience and remain relevant for a longer period. The 200MP camera, while potentially exceeding the needs of an average user, showcases Realme's commitment to innovation in mobile photography, and pending reviews, might offer significant improvement in image quality. Though megapixel count isn't everything, coupled with OIS, it promises better low-light performance and detailed shots.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.