Realme 11 Pro+ vs Motorola Razr 50 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola

General

Launch Date May 15, 2023 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 97.93 cm³ 92.54 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.66 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 183 g 188.4 g
Height 161.6 mm 171.3 mm
Width 73.9 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 7.3 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Astral Black
  • Sunrise Beige
  • Oasis Green
  • Koala Grey (Steel Wool)
  • Beach Sand (Pumice Stone)
  • Spritz Orange (Arabesque)

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2412 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90.5 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 950 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.06 mAh/cm³ 45.39 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 15

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureRealme 11 Pro+Motorola Razr 50Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.6 x 73.9 x 8.2171.3 x 74 x 7.3Razr 50 is taller and slightly narrower when unfolded, significantly smaller when folded. Realme 11 Pro+ is thinner. Razr 50's foldability offers portability advantage.
Weight (g)183188.4Negligible weight difference in practical usage.
FoldableNoYesRazr 50's foldability provides significant portability and pocketability benefits.
Display
Size (inches)6.76.9Razr 50 offers a slightly larger screen size for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24121080 x 2640Razr 50's taller display provides slightly more vertical screen real estate.
TypeAMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLEDRazr 50's foldable LTPO AMOLED potentially offers better power efficiency and dynamic refresh rate adjustment, but confirmation on LTPO functionality is needed.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)9503000Razr 50's significantly higher peak brightness ensures exceptional outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetDimensity 7050Dimensity 7300XRazr 50's 4nm Dimensity 7300X should offer better performance and power efficiency compared to Realme's 6nm Dimensity 7050.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz A78 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz A78 & 4x2.0 GHz A55)Razr 50's CPU configuration suggests improved multi-core performance due to more high-performance cores.
GPUMali-G68 MC4Mali-G615 MC2While the Razr 50 uses a newer generation GPU, architectural differences make direct comparison difficult without benchmarks. Practical gaming impact is unclear.
RAM8/12GB8/12GBBoth offer ample RAM for multitasking, though specific configurations need clarification for comparison.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)20050Realme 11 Pro+ boasts significantly higher resolution. Practical image quality differences depend on sensor size, processing, and real-world testing.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50004200Realme 11 Pro+ offers a larger battery capacity, potentially translating to longer battery life. Real-world usage will vary based on individual usage patterns.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Realme 11 Pro+ Advantages:

  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: Potentially captures more detail, enabling larger prints and more flexibility in cropping. Real-world results depend on other camera factors.
  • Larger Battery Capacity: Likely to provide longer usage time between charges.
  • Lower Price: Offers better value for money if camera resolution and battery life are priorities.

Motorola Razr 50 Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Offers unmatched portability and a unique form factor.
  • More Powerful Chipset: Expected to deliver smoother performance in demanding tasks and games.
  • Brighter Display: Significantly better outdoor visibility.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Realme 11 Pro+: Ideal for users who prioritize battery life, a high-resolution camera on paper, and value for money. Suitable for:

  • Casual photographers: The high megapixel count might appeal to users who frequently share photos on social media.
  • Heavy users: The large battery capacity caters to users with extended usage needs.
  • Budget-conscious buyers: Offers competitive features at a lower price point.

Motorola Razr 50: Ideal for users who value portability, a unique design, and a brighter display. Suitable for:

  • Style-conscious users: The foldable design offers a distinct aesthetic and conversation starter.
  • Users on the go: The compact folded size is ideal for pockets and small bags.
  • Users who prioritize outdoor visibility: The exceptionally bright display ensures readability in sunlight.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is portability? If pocketability is paramount, the Razr 50's foldable design is a clear winner.
  2. What is your budget? The Realme 11 Pro+ offers better value in terms of raw specifications for the price.
  3. What are your primary use cases? Consider whether you prioritize camera resolution, battery life, performance, or design.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited budget, heavy social media usage: Realme 11 Pro+
  • Prioritize portability and style: Motorola Razr 50
  • Demand performance and a bright display: Motorola Razr 50

My Choice: Motorola Razr 50

While the Realme 11 Pro+ offers a compelling combination of specifications for its price, I would choose the Motorola Razr 50. The foldable design significantly enhances portability, a crucial factor for me. The more powerful chipset and brighter display are also significant advantages in my daily usage. Though the battery capacity is smaller, the potential power efficiency gains from the 4nm process and LTPO display (if confirmed) could offset this difference. I'm willing to compromise on the main camera's megapixel count for the overall superior user experience offered by the Razr 50's form factor and expected performance. The superior build quality and materials often found in foldable devices also contribute to this decision.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.