Realme 11 Pro+ vs Motorola Razr 40 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date May 15, 2023 June 21, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 97.93 cm³ 93.53 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.66 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 183 g 188.6 g
Height 161.6 mm 170.8 mm
Width 73.9 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Astral Black
  • Sunrise Beige
  • Oasis Green
  • Sage Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Summer Lilac
  • Grape Compote
  • Cherry Blossom

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2412 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90.5 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 950 nits 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.06 mAh/cm³ 44.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 15 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureRealme 11 Pro+Motorola Razr 40Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.6 x 73.9 x 8.2170.8 x 74 x 7.4Razr 40 is taller and slightly thicker when unfolded, but significantly smaller when folded due to its foldable design. Pro+ is thinner overall when unfolded.
Weight (g)183188.6Negligible weight difference in practical use.
FoldableNoYesRazr 40 offers portability and a unique form factor. Pro+ is a traditional slab design.
Display
Display TypeAMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLEDRazr 40's foldable display allows for a larger screen in a smaller device, but introduces a potential crease. Pro+ offers a standard, uninterrupted display.
Size (inches)6.76.9Razr 40 provides more screen real estate.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24121080 x 2640Both offer sharp visuals, but Razr 40 is slightly taller.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120144Razr 40 boasts smoother animations and scrolling.
Peak Brightness (nits)9501400Razr 40 is significantly brighter, improving outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 generally offers better performance and efficiency due to its more advanced manufacturing process.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Snapdragon 7 Gen 1's architecture should provide superior performance in demanding tasks and multitasking.
GPUMali-G68 MC4Adreno 644Adreno 644 generally provides better gaming performance.
RAM (GB)88Both phones have the same amount of RAM in this comparison. More RAM options might be available for each phone.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)20064Realme boasts higher resolution, potentially capturing more detail. However, megapixels alone don't determine image quality; sensor size and processing are crucial.
Ultrawide (MP)813Razr 40 has a slightly higher resolution ultrawide.
Macro (MP)2Combined with ultrawideDedicated macro lens on the Realme might offer better close-up shots compared to a combined ultrawide/macro solution.
Selfie (MP)3232Same resolution, but image quality will depend on sensor and processing.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50004200Realme offers significantly longer battery life.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Realme 11 Pro+ Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: Significantly longer battery life.
  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: Potential for more detailed photos (dependent on other factors).
  • Dedicated Macro Lens: Potentially better close-up shots.
  • Lower Price: Generally more affordable.

Motorola Razr 40 Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Increased portability and unique form factor.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Smoother animations and scrolling.
  • Brighter Display: Better outdoor visibility.
  • More Powerful Chipset: Improved performance in demanding tasks and gaming.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Realme 11 Pro+: Ideal for users prioritizing battery life, a large display, and affordability. Suitable for everyday use, media consumption, and casual photography.

Motorola Razr 40: Ideal for users who value portability, a unique design, and smooth performance. Suitable for those who want a pocketable device with a large screen and are willing to compromise on battery life for the foldable form factor.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is portability? Foldable design is key for maximum portability.
  2. What's your budget? Realme generally offers better value for the price.
  3. What are your primary use cases? (Gaming, photography, media consumption, etc.)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy user needing long battery life: Realme 11 Pro+
  • User prioritizing portability and style: Motorola Razr 40
  • Gamer on a budget: Realme 11 Pro+ might offer better value depending on specific gaming needs.
  • User wanting the best possible display: Motorola Razr 40

My Choice: Realme 11 Pro+

While the Razr 40 offers a compelling foldable design and performance advantages, the Realme 11 Pro+ better suits my needs. I prioritize battery life and overall value. The significantly larger battery capacity is a crucial factor for me. The 200MP camera, while not solely indicative of quality, offers potential benefits in certain scenarios. The price difference, combined with the longer battery life and satisfactory performance for my typical usage (browsing, media consumption, light gaming), makes the Realme 11 Pro+ the more compelling choice for me. The dedicated macro lens is also a plus for occasional close-up photography. I acknowledge the trade-offs in terms of raw performance and display quality, but these are acceptable compromises given my priorities.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.