Oppo Reno8 vs Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo Reno8
Oppo Reno8
Oppo

General

Launch Date July 25, 2022 January 12, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 90.77 cm³ 96.66 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.58 "/g 3.73 "/g
Weight 179 g 179 g
Height 160.6 mm 161.1 mm
Width 73.4 mm 75 mm
Thickness 7.7 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Shimmer Gold
  • Shimmer Black
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.9 % 88.9 %
Pixel Density 411 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 430 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 600 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 800 nits 1300 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 109.86 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.58 mAh/cm³ 51.73 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G77 MC9 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Oppo Reno8 vs. Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro: A Deep Dive for the Discerning Smartphone User

Hello, fellow tech explorers! Alex Griffin here, ready to dissect the Oppo Reno8 and Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro. We'll go beyond the spec sheets to uncover what these phones really offer in terms of daily use. Let's get started!

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureOppo Reno8Xiaomi Poco M6 ProReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)160.6 x 73.4 x 7.7161.1 x 75 x 8Poco M6 Pro slightly larger; both slim and pocketable.
Weight (g)179179Virtually identical weight; comfortable for one-handed use.
Display
TypeAMOLEDAMOLEDVibrant colors, deep blacks, excellent contrast on both.
Size (inches)6.46.67Poco M6 Pro offers a larger screen for media consumption.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120Smoother animations and scrolling on the Poco M6 Pro.
Peak Brightness800 nits1300 nitsPoco M6 Pro significantly brighter for outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetDimensity 1300Helio G99 UltraDimensity 1300 generally more powerful for demanding tasks.
CPUOcta-core (Cortex-A78/A55)Octa-core (Cortex-A76/A55)Similar core configuration; Dimensity 1300 likely faster.
GPUMali-G77 MC9Mali-G57 MC2Mali-G77 MC9 offers superior graphics performance.
RAM (GB)88 (up to 12)Poco M6 Pro offers higher RAM configuration for better multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)50 (Sony IMX766)64 (OmniVision OV64B)Both offer high resolution; IMX766 generally known for quality.
Video4K@30fps1080p@60fpsReno8 offers higher resolution video recording.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)45005000Poco M6 Pro has a larger battery for potentially longer life.
Fast Charging80W67WReno8 charges significantly faster.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Reno8, with its Dimensity 1300, holds a clear edge in processing power and graphics rendering. This translates to smoother gameplay, faster app loading, and better multitasking, especially under heavy load. The Poco M6 Pro, while capable for daily tasks, might show some strain with demanding applications.
  • Display: While both phones boast AMOLED screens, the Poco M6 Pro's higher refresh rate (120Hz) and peak brightness make for a more fluid and enjoyable viewing experience, especially outdoors. However, the Reno 8 likely leverages the Sony IMX766 sensor better for image quality.
  • Camera: The megapixel count might favor the Poco M6 Pro (64MP vs. 50MP), but the Reno8 uses the renowned Sony IMX766 sensor, often found in flagship devices. This suggests superior image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The Reno8 also boasts 4K video recording, a significant advantage for content creators.
  • Battery and Charging: The Poco M6 Pro's 5000mAh battery likely offers longer usage time on a single charge. However, the Reno8's 80W SuperVOOC fast charging significantly reduces downtime.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Oppo Reno8: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a premium camera experience, and fast charging. Gamers, photography enthusiasts, and those who demand a responsive phone will appreciate the Reno8.
  • Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro: Best suited for users seeking a large, vibrant display with a smooth refresh rate and long battery life. Casual users, media consumers, and those on a tighter budget will find the Poco M6 Pro appealing.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What are your primary smartphone needs? Gaming and photography? Choose the Reno8. Media consumption and long battery life? Opt for the Poco M6 Pro.
  2. What is your budget? The Poco M6 Pro generally comes at a more affordable price point.
  3. How important is fast charging? If minimizing charging time is crucial, the Reno8 is the clear winner.

My Choice: As Alex Griffin, I would personally choose the Oppo Reno8. While the Poco M6 Pro offers a compelling display and battery, I value the superior performance, camera quality (especially considering the Sony IMX 766 sensor), and blazing-fast charging offered by the Reno8. These features align better with my needs as a tech enthusiast and content creator who often pushes devices to their limits. The slightly smaller battery is a trade-off I'm willing to make for the overall smoother and more powerful experience. However, if budget is a significant constraint, the Poco M6 Pro is a solid alternative.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.