Oppo Reno8 T vs Samsung Galaxy A55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 2, 2023 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 92.56 cm³ 102.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.57 "/g 3.1 "/g
Weight 180 g 213 g
Height 160.8 mm 161.1 mm
Width 73.8 mm 77.4 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black Starlight
  • Orange Sunset
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.43 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.1 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 409 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 430 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 800 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 120.93 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 54.02 mAh/cm³ 48.9 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) Exynos 1480 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Xclipse 530

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 14 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Reno8 TSamsung Galaxy A55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)160.8 x 73.8 x 7.8161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2A55 slightly larger and thicker
Weight (g)180213Reno8 T noticeably lighter, more comfortable for extended use
Display
Display TypeAMOLED, 90HzSuper AMOLED, 120HzA55 smoother scrolling and animations due to higher refresh rate; potentially brighter with HDR10+ support
Display Size (inches)6.436.6A55 slightly larger screen for media consumption
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2340Negligible difference in sharpness
Peak Brightness (nits)800(Unspecified, but likely higher due to HDR10+)A55 likely better visibility in bright sunlight
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G99 (6nm)Exynos 1480 (4nm)A55 significantly more powerful CPU and GPU, leading to smoother multitasking and better gaming performance. More efficient due to smaller process node.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)A55's faster and more modern CPU cores provide a significant performance advantage.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Xclipse 530A55's GPU provides noticeably better graphics performance for gaming and demanding applications.
RAM8GB8GB/12GBA55 offers a 12GB option for even smoother multitasking
OSAndroid 13Android 14A55 comes with a newer OS version, offering potential feature and security advantages, and longer software support with updates up to Android 18.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)10850Reno8 T higher resolution; A55 likely better image quality due to larger sensor (1/1.56" vs 1/1.67") and OIS
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fpsA55 offers significantly higher video resolution
Optical Image StabilizationNoYesA55 will have significantly more stable videos and potentially better low-light photos.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery life expected
Fast Charging67W25WReno8 T significantly faster charging

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Reno8 T Advantages:

  • Lighter and slimmer: More comfortable for one-handed use and carrying.
  • Faster Charging: Significantly reduces charging time.
  • Higher resolution main camera: Potentially more detailed photos in good lighting conditions. (Though sensor size and other factors can greatly influence final image quality).

Samsung Galaxy A55 Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: Smoother performance for demanding tasks and gaming. Longer term performance due to more powerful and efficient chipset.
  • Higher refresh rate display: Smoother scrolling and animations, more responsive feel. Better display features with HDR10+ support.
  • Better camera system overall: Optical image stabilization for steadier video and better low light performance. Superior main sensor for image quality despite lower resolution. Higher resolution video recording capabilities (4K). More versatile camera system with ultrawide lens.
  • Newer Android version with longer support: Latest features and security updates. Software support guaranteed until Android 18.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Reno8 T: Users prioritizing a lightweight phone with fast charging and a high-resolution main camera sensor. Best for casual users primarily focused on social media, basic photography, and everyday tasks. Budget-conscious buyers looking for a decent all-around phone.

Samsung Galaxy A55: Users who value performance, a smooth display, a versatile and capable camera system, and the longevity of software updates. Ideal for gamers, power users, photography enthusiasts, and those who want a future-proof device.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The A55 is likely more expensive but offers better value in the long run due to performance and longevity.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Casual users might find the Reno8 T sufficient, while power users and gamers will appreciate the A55's performance.
  3. How important are camera quality and features? The A55 offers a more versatile and capable camera system overall.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A55

While the Oppo Reno8 T offers advantages in weight and charging speed, the Samsung Galaxy A55 is the superior choice for me due to its significantly more powerful processor, higher refresh rate display, superior camera system with OIS, newer OS with longer update support, and better overall future-proofing. The performance difference and longer software update cycle are crucial factors for long-term satisfaction. While heavier, the benefits offered by the A55 outweigh the slight increase in size and weight. Additionally, the price difference isn't substantial enough to justify sacrificing the significant advantages offered by the A55.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.