Oppo Reno8 T vs Samsung Galaxy A24 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 2, 2023 May 5, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 92.56 cm³ 104.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.57 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 180 g 195 g
Height 160.8 mm 162.1 mm
Width 73.8 mm 77.6 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black Starlight
  • Orange Sunset
  • Black
  • Lime Green
  • Blue gradient
  • Dark red

Display

Screen Size 6.43 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.1 % 82.4 %
Pixel Density 409 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 430 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 800 nits 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 120.93 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 54.02 mAh/cm³ 47.89 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Reno8 TSamsung Galaxy A24 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)160.8 x 73.8 x 7.8162.1 x 77.6 x 8.3A24 slightly larger and thicker
Weight (g)180195Reno8 T noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use
Fingerprint SensorUnder-displaySide-mountedPreference-based; under-display feels more modern
Display
Size (inches)6.436.5Negligible size difference
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2340Virtually identical sharpness
TypeAMOLED, 90HzSuper AMOLED, 90HzBoth offer vibrant colors and smooth scrolling; Super AMOLED potentially brighter
Peak Brightness (nits)8001000A24's higher peak brightness improves outdoor visibility
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)Identical performance expected
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Same CPU architecture and clock speeds indicate similar performance
GPUMali-G57 MC2Mali-G57 MC2Identical GPUs; expect similar gaming performance
RAM (GB)86/8 (Variant dependent)8GB Reno8 T offers better multitasking; A24 offers variants, impacting price and performance.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)10850Reno8 T boasts significantly higher resolution for potentially more detailed photos
Ultrawide (MP)Not specified5Reno8 T lacks ultrawide, limiting field of view; A24 offers basic ultrawide functionality
Macro (MP)22Likely similar macro capabilities
Selfie (MP)3213Reno8 T offers much higher resolution selfies
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fps with EISA24 features Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) for smoother videos
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity
Fast Charging (W)6725Reno8 T charges significantly faster

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Reno8 T Advantages:

  • Lighter and slimmer design: Improves handling and portability.
  • Higher resolution main and selfie cameras: Potentially better image quality, especially in good lighting.
  • Faster charging: Significantly reduces downtime.
  • Higher RAM in this specific comparison (8GB vs 6GB): Better multitasking and smoother performance.

Samsung Galaxy A24 4G Advantages:

  • Brighter display: Enhanced outdoor visibility.
  • Ultrawide camera: Provides a wider field of view for capturing landscapes or group photos.
  • Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS): Smoother video recording.
  • Potentially lower price (variant dependent): Offers a more budget-friendly option, especially the 4GB/128GB variant.
  • Longer Software Support: Expected OS updates up to Android 17 compared to Android 14 on the Reno8 T.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Reno8 T: Users who prioritize a sleek design, fast charging, high-resolution cameras for still photography, and smoother multitasking due to the 8GB RAM. Ideal for:

  • Social media enthusiasts
  • Casual photographers
  • Users who value quick charging

Samsung Galaxy A24 4G: Users seeking a brighter display for outdoor use, stable video recording, and a wider field of view in photos. Budget-conscious buyers should consider the 4GB/128GB variant. Ideal for:

  • Users who consume a lot of media
  • Videographers
  • Budget-conscious buyers

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The A24 generally offers a lower entry price point with its various RAM/Storage variants.
  2. What are your photography priorities? Reno8 T for higher resolution stills; A24 for wider angles and stabilized video.
  3. How important is charging speed? Reno8 T offers significantly faster charging.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget: Samsung Galaxy A24 4G (4GB/128GB)
  • Photography Enthusiast (Stills): Oppo Reno8 T
  • Video Recording Focus: Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
  • Fast Charging is Crucial: Oppo Reno8 T

My Choice:

I would choose the Oppo Reno8 T. While the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G offers a brighter display and ultrawide camera, the Reno8 T's lighter design, superior main and selfie camera resolution (important for my social media use), significantly faster charging, and 8GB RAM in this comparison outweigh those benefits for me. The faster charging, in particular, is a major convenience in my daily use. While the A24 offers longer software updates, the Reno8 T's Android 14 upgrade should be sufficient for my needs in the foreseeable future. I prioritize these features over a slightly brighter screen or an ultrawide camera, making the Reno8 T a better fit for my personal preferences.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.