Oppo Reno8 T vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 2, 2023 June 5, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 92.56 cm³ 88.47 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.57 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 180 g 184.5 g
Height 160.8 mm 170.8 mm
Width 73.8 mm 74 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 7 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Black Starlight
  • Orange Sunset
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz

Display

Screen Size 6.43 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.1 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 409 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness 430 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 800 nits 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 120.93 mAh/in² 79.82 mAh/in²
Battery Density 54.02 mAh/cm³ 42.95 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 3800 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Reno8 TMotorola Razr 40 UltraPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)160.8 x 73.8 x 7.8170.8 x 74 x 7Razr 40 Ultra is taller and slightly wider but significantly thinner due to its foldable design. Reno8 T is more pocketable in traditional sense.
Weight (g)180184.5Negligible weight difference.
FoldableNoYesRazr 40 Ultra offers a compact folded size and a larger screen when unfolded, enhancing portability and viewing experience.
Display
Size (inches)6.436.9Razr 40 Ultra boasts a larger display for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2640Similar pixel density despite size difference, resulting in comparable sharpness.
TypeAMOLED, 90HzFoldable LTPO AMOLED, 165HzRazr 40 Ultra's LTPO panel allows for dynamic refresh rate adjustment, saving battery. Higher 165Hz refresh rate provides smoother visuals. Foldable screen introduces a crease.
Peak Brightness (nits)8001400Razr 40 Ultra offers significantly higher peak brightness for better outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G99 (6nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm)Razr 40 Ultra features a significantly more powerful processor and GPU, enabling superior performance in demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Razr 40 Ultra has a more modern and powerful CPU architecture.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 730Razr 40 Ultra's GPU offers considerably better graphics performance.
RAM (GB)88/12Razr 40 Ultra offers a 12GB RAM option for even smoother multitasking.
Camera
Rear Camera (MP)108 + 2 + 212 + 13While Reno8 T boasts higher megapixel count, Razr 40 Ultra's camera system might offer better overall image quality due to superior processing and potentially larger sensor size (unspecified for Razr).
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@60fps with HDR, EISRazr 40 Ultra supports significantly higher resolution and frame rate video recording with HDR and EIS for superior video quality.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50003800Reno8 T offers a larger battery capacity potentially leading to longer battery life.
Fast Charging (W)6730Reno8 T supports much faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Reno8 T Advantages:

  • Longer Battery Life: Larger 5000mAh battery.
  • Faster Charging: 67W fast charging.
  • More Affordable: Generally positioned in a lower price bracket.
  • Traditional Form Factor: Familiar and pocketable for users who prefer a slab phone.

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Compact when folded, larger screen when unfolded.
  • Significantly More Powerful: Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chip offers superior performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Higher Quality Display: LTPO AMOLED with 165Hz refresh rate and HDR10+ for smoother visuals and better outdoor visibility.
  • Higher Quality Video Recording: 4K@60fps with HDR and EIS.

Trade-offs:

  • Razr 40 Ultra: Shorter battery life, slower charging, higher price, potential durability concerns with the folding screen.
  • Reno8 T: Lower performance, less impressive display, limited video recording capabilities.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Reno8 T:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users prioritizing battery life and charging speed for everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and light gaming.
  • Use Cases: Casual photography, long commutes, general smartphone usage without heavy multitasking or gaming.

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra:

  • Ideal User: Tech-savvy users who value cutting-edge technology, a unique foldable design, top-tier performance, and a premium viewing experience. Willing to compromise on battery life for portability and form factor.
  • Use Cases: Demanding mobile gaming, content creation (photography and video), multitasking, users seeking a compact yet large-screen device.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Budget: How much are you willing to spend?
  2. Performance Needs: Do you require top-tier performance for demanding tasks or is moderate performance sufficient?
  3. Form Factor Preference: Do you prioritize a traditional slab phone with long battery life or a compact foldable phone with a larger screen?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Prioritize Battery: Oppo Reno8 T.
  • Heavy Multitasker, Mobile Gamer: Motorola Razr 40 Ultra.
  • Desire a Compact and Powerful Phone: Motorola Razr 40 Ultra.
  • Prioritize Long Battery Life and Fast Charging: Oppo Reno8 T.

My Choice: Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

While the Reno8 T offers practical advantages like longer battery life and faster charging, the Razr 40 Ultra's superior performance, stunning display, and innovative foldable design are more compelling to me. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience, especially for multitasking and occasional gaming. The compact form factor of the Razr, combined with its large unfolded screen, is a significant advantage for portability and media consumption. I am willing to compromise on battery life, as I can manage it with power banks and optimized usage. The unique form factor and cutting-edge technology of the Razr 40 Ultra make it a more exciting and future-proof choice for me. The significantly faster processor and better GPU are crucial for long-term performance and usability.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.