Oppo Reno8 T vs Motorola Moto G55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 2, 2023 September 6, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 92.56 cm³ 96.6 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.57 "/g 3.63 "/g
Weight 180 g 179 g
Height 160.8 mm 161.6 mm
Width 73.8 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black Starlight
  • Orange Sunset
  • Forest Grey
  • Smoky Green
  • Twilight Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.43 " 6.49 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.1 % 85.3 %
Pixel Density 409 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 430 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 800 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 120.93 mAh/in² 118.71 mAh/in²
Battery Density 54.02 mAh/cm³ 51.76 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 IMG BXM-8-256

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Reno8 TMotorola Moto G55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)160.8 x 73.8 x 7.8161.6 x 73.8 x 8.1Virtually identical in hand feel.
Weight (g)180179Negligible weight difference.
Fingerprint SensorUnder-displaySide-mountedPersonal preference; under-display feels more modern.
Display
Display TypeAMOLED, 90HzIPS LCD, 120HzMoto G55 has smoother scrolling and animations due to higher refresh rate, but Reno8 T offers richer colors and deeper blacks thanks to AMOLED.
Display Size (inches)6.436.49Slight size difference, negligible in real-world use.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2400Identical resolution, sharpness is comparable.
Peak Brightness (nits)800UnknownReno8 T's known higher peak brightness ensures better outdoor visibility. Missing Moto G55 data limits comparison.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G99 (6nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6nm)Moto G55 has a more powerful CPU with faster Cortex-A78 cores, resulting in better performance for demanding tasks and multitasking.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Moto G55's CPU offers noticeable performance advantage due to faster and more efficient cores.
GPUMali-G57 MC2IMG BXM-8-256Difficult to compare directly without benchmarks; both should handle casual gaming.
RAM (GB)88Identical RAM capacity; multitasking performance should be comparable.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)10850Reno8 T boasts significantly higher resolution, potentially capturing more detail. However, megapixel count isn't everything; image quality depends on sensor size, processing, and other factors.
Front Camera (MP)3216Reno8 T has a higher resolution front camera, potentially resulting in better selfies.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30/60fpsMoto G55 offers smoother video recording with 60fps option.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity.
Fast Charging (W)6730Reno8 T charges significantly faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Reno8 T Advantages:

  • Brighter Display: Higher peak brightness for better outdoor visibility.
  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: Potentially capturing more detailed photos.
  • Significantly Faster Charging: Less downtime.
  • AMOLED Display: Richer colors and deeper blacks.

Motorola Moto G55 Advantages:

  • Smoother Display: 120Hz refresh rate for fluid scrolling and animations.
  • More Powerful CPU: Better performance for demanding tasks and multitasking.
  • 60fps Video Recording: Smoother video capture.
  • Lower Price: Offers better value for money considering performance.

Trade-offs:

  • Reno8 T: Prioritizes camera resolution and charging speed over display smoothness and processing power.
  • Moto G55: Prioritizes performance and smoother display over camera resolution and charging speed.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Reno8 T: Ideal for users who prioritize camera quality, vibrant visuals, and fast charging. Suitable for social media enthusiasts, casual photographers, and those who consume media on their phones.

Motorola Moto G55: Best suited for users who value smooth performance, responsive gaming, and a good price-to-performance ratio. Ideal for budget-conscious buyers, mobile gamers, and those who multitask frequently.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Is camera quality a top priority? If yes, the Reno8 T's 108MP sensor might be appealing.
  2. How important is smooth scrolling and app performance? If crucial, the Moto G55's 120Hz display and more powerful processor are significant advantages.
  3. What's your budget? The Moto G55 offers compelling value for its price.

My Choice: Motorola Moto G55

While the Reno8 T has appealing features like a higher resolution camera and faster charging, the Moto G55's superior performance and smoother 120Hz display are more important to my personal usage. I value a responsive and fluid user experience, especially for everyday tasks and light gaming. The significantly lower price of the Moto G55 further solidifies its value proposition for me. Although the Reno8 T has a 108MP camera, real-world image quality often depends on factors beyond resolution, and the Moto G55's 50MP camera likely still provides excellent results for everyday photography. The faster charging on the Reno8 T is attractive, but the Moto G55's 30W charging is sufficient for my needs. Ultimately, the Moto G55 provides a better balance of performance, features, and price for my preferences.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.