Oppo Reno8 T vs Motorola Moto E13 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 2, 2023 February 13, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 92.56 cm³ 104.68 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.57 "/g 3.62 "/g
Weight 180 g 179.5 g
Height 160.8 mm 164.2 mm
Width 73.8 mm 75 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black Starlight
  • Orange Sunset
  • Cosmic Black
  • Aurora Green
  • Creamy White

Display

Screen Size 6.43 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.1 % 82.8 %
Pixel Density 409 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness 430 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 800 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 120.93 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 54.02 mAh/cm³ 47.77 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Reno8 TMotorola Moto E13Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)160.8 x 73.8 x 7.8164.2 x 75 x 8.5Moto E13 is slightly larger and thicker.
Weight (g)180179.5Negligible weight difference.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality and materials unknown, impacting durability.
Display
Display TypeAMOLED, 90HzIPS LCDReno8 T offers more vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling with 90Hz refresh rate. Moto E13's LCD is less power-efficient and has potentially less vibrant colors.
Display Size (inches)6.436.5Moto E13 has a slightly larger screen.
Resolution (pixels)1080 x 2400720 x 1600Reno8 T has a significantly sharper display (409 ppi vs 270 ppi), resulting in clearer text and images.
Peak Brightness (nits)800Not specifiedReno8 T's higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in sunlight. Missing Moto E13 data limits comparison.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G99 (6nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)Reno8 T's Helio G99 provides better performance and efficiency due to the smaller 6nm process.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz A76 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz A75 & 6x1.6 GHz A55)Reno8 T has faster CPU cores, leading to noticeably smoother multitasking and app loading.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Mali-G57 MP1Reno8 T offers superior graphics performance for gaming and demanding applications.
RAM8GB2GB/4GBReno8 T's 8GB RAM ensures significantly smoother multitasking and prevents app closures. Moto E13's lower RAM options will likely lead to performance bottlenecks.
Camera
Rear Camera108MP main, 2MP depth, 2MP macro13MP mainReno8 T boasts a much higher resolution main camera, potentially capturing more detail. Practical image quality depends on sensor and processing, which are partially unknown for Moto E13.
Front Camera32MP5MPReno8 T's higher resolution front camera offers significantly better selfie quality.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth offer basic video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity.
Fast Charging67W10WReno8 T offers dramatically faster charging speeds, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Reno8 T Advantages:

  • Significantly better display: AMOLED with 90Hz refresh rate offers superior color accuracy, contrast, and smoothness.
  • Superior performance: More powerful chipset, CPU, and GPU translate to a smoother user experience, especially for gaming and multitasking.
  • Higher resolution cameras: Potentially better image and video quality.
  • Much faster charging: 67W fast charging significantly reduces charging time.

Motorola Moto E13 Advantages:

  • Slightly larger display: Offers marginally more screen real estate.
  • Lower price: Significantly more affordable.

Trade-offs:

  • The Moto E13 sacrifices performance, display quality, and charging speed for affordability.
  • The Reno8 T comes at a premium price but delivers a significantly improved user experience.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Reno8 T: Users who prioritize performance, display quality, camera capabilities, and fast charging. Suitable for gaming, media consumption, and demanding tasks.

Motorola Moto E13: Budget-conscious users who primarily need a basic smartphone for calling, texting, and light web browsing. Suitable for users with undemanding needs.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto E13 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary use cases? The Reno8 T excels in demanding tasks like gaming and media consumption, while the Moto E13 is sufficient for basic usage.
  3. How important is display quality and performance? The Reno8 T offers a substantial upgrade in these areas.

My Choice: Oppo Reno8 T

While the Moto E13 offers an attractive price, the Oppo Reno8 T provides a significantly better overall user experience. The superior display, performance, cameras, and incredibly fast charging outweigh the price difference for me. The Reno8 T offers a more future-proof device that will handle demanding tasks and provide a more enjoyable user experience in the long run. The Moto E13, while budget-friendly, compromises too much on key features that are important for a satisfying smartphone experience. The low RAM, in particular, is a major concern for long-term usability.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.