Oppo Reno7 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo Reno7
Oppo Reno7
Oppo

General

Launch Date April 2, 2022 August 25, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 87.79 cm³ 81.96 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.67 "/g 3.58 "/g
Weight 175 g 187 g
Height 159.9 mm 165.2 mm
Width 73.2 mm 71.9 mm
Thickness 7.5 mm 6.9 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Black
  • Sunset Orange
  • Red
  • Yellow
  • Blue
  • White
  • Graphite
  • Navy
  • Pink Gold
  • Bora Purple
  • Khaki

Display

Screen Size 6.43 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.3 % 85.4 %
Pixel Density 409 PPI 426 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 430 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 600 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 800 nits 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.84 mAh/in² 82.42 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.26 mAh/cm³ 45.15 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 3700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 610 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version 14 14

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison of the Oppo Reno7 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4, dissecting their technical specifications and translating them into real-world user experiences.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureOppo Reno7Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm165.2 x 71.9 x 6.9 mmZ Flip4 is taller and slightly thinner when unfolded, but significantly more compact when folded. Reno7 is wider and feels larger in hand.
Weight175g187gReno7 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
FoldableNoYesZ Flip4's unique folding design offers portability and a distinct "cool" factor.
Display
Size6.43"6.7"Z Flip4 offers a larger screen area for immersive content consumption.
Resolution1080x24001080x2640Z Flip4 has a slightly sharper display, but the difference is negligible in everyday use.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzZ Flip4's higher refresh rate results in smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing the overall feel.
Brightness800 nits1200 nitsZ Flip4's significantly higher brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility, even in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSD 680SD 8+ Gen 1Z Flip4 boasts a vastly more powerful processor, delivering significantly faster performance across all tasks and future-proofing.
Antutu Score249,0001,050,371This massive difference translates to a dramatically smoother and more responsive experience on the Z Flip4, especially for demanding games.
RAM8GB8GBBoth phones offer ample RAM for multitasking, ensuring smooth app switching.
Camera
Main Camera64MP f/1.712MP f/1.8While Reno7 has higher megapixels, Z Flip4's larger pixel size and superior processing likely result in better overall image quality.
Selfie Camera32MP f/2.410MP f/2.4Similar to the main camera, Reno7 boasts higher resolution, but Z Flip4 likely delivers better real-world selfie performance.
Video1080p@30fps4K@60fpsZ Flip4 offers significantly higher video resolution and frame rates, capturing more detailed and smoother footage.
Battery Life
Capacity4500mAh3700mAhReno7 packs a larger battery, potentially offering longer battery life.
Charging33W25WReno7 supports faster wired charging. Z Flip4 offers wireless charging, a feature absent in the Reno7.

2. Key Insights

Oppo Reno7: A mid-range device prioritizing battery life and a decent camera experience. Its larger battery and faster charging are appealing for users seeking all-day endurance. However, its processor is significantly less powerful than the Z Flip4's.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4: A premium, foldable phone with top-tier performance and a unique form factor. Its powerful processor, high refresh rate display, and excellent camera make it a true flagship contender. The foldable design adds portability and a "wow" factor, but compromises on battery capacity.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Reno7: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and casual smartphone usage. It's a reliable device for everyday tasks, social media, and light gaming.

Z Flip4: Ideal for users who value cutting-edge technology, premium performance, and a unique, stylish device. It's a great choice for power users, content creators, and those who want a phone that turns heads.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What's your budget? The Reno7 is significantly more affordable.
  2. Do you prioritize performance or battery life? Z Flip4 excels in performance, Reno7 in battery.
  3. Is a foldable design important to you? This is the defining feature of the Z Flip4.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

While the Reno7 offers excellent battery life, the Z Flip4's superior performance, stunning display, and innovative foldable design are too compelling to ignore. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 ensures a future-proof experience, and the compact form factor when folded is a game-changer for portability. As a tech enthusiast, I value innovation and a premium user experience, making the Z Flip4 the clear winner for me, despite its higher price and smaller battery. The ability to quickly fold the phone and slip it into a small pocket is a huge advantage in my active lifestyle.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.