Oppo Reno7 vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo Reno7
Oppo Reno7
Oppo

General

Launch Date April 2, 2022 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 87.79 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.67 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 175 g 222 g
Height 159.9 mm 162.3 mm
Width 73.2 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 7.5 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Black
  • Sunset Orange
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.43 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.3 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 409 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 430 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 600 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 800 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.84 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.26 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Oppo Reno7 vs. Samsung Galaxy M35: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Oppo Reno7 and Samsung Galaxy M35, going beyond the spec sheet to uncover what truly matters for everyday use.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureOppo Reno7Samsung Galaxy M35Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm, 175g162.3 x 78.6 x 9.1 mm, 222gReno7 is noticeably smaller and lighter, enhancing one-handed use and portability. M35 might feel bulkier.
BuildGorilla Glass 5Gorilla Glass VictusM35 offers significantly better screen protection against drops and scratches.
Display
Size6.43" AMOLED, 90Hz6.6" AMOLED, 120HzM35 boasts a slightly larger display and a smoother refresh rate for more immersive visuals and responsive interactions.
Resolution1080x2400, 409 PPI1080x2340, 390 PPIVirtually indistinguishable sharpness in everyday use.
Brightness800 nits0 nits (Data Missing - Critical!)Reno7's superior brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility. Lack of M35 data hinders a complete comparison.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 680 4G (6nm)Exynos 1380 (5nm)M35's Exynos 1380 significantly outperforms the Snapdragon 680 in benchmarks, promising smoother multitasking and gaming.
Antutu249,000578,500M35 offers a substantial performance advantage.
RAM8GB6GB or 8GB8GB RAM on both (in higher M35 variant) ensures smooth app switching and multitasking.
Camera
Main64MP, f/1.750MP, f/1.8, Sony LYT-600 SensorReno7 boasts higher resolution; M35 uses a reputable Sony sensor, promising better low-light performance. More details needed for a conclusive comparison.
Selfie32MP, f/2.4, Sony IMX709 Sensor13MP, f/2.2Reno7's higher resolution selfie camera is geared towards detail-rich self-portraits.
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fpsM35 supports 4K video recording for higher quality content.
Battery Life
Capacity4500mAh, 33W Fast Charging6000mAh, 25W Fast ChargingM35 packs a significantly larger battery for potentially longer endurance, despite slower charging.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Galaxy M35's Exynos 1380 delivers a considerable performance leap over the Reno7's Snapdragon 680. This translates to faster app loading, smoother gaming, and a more responsive overall experience.
  • Display: While both offer AMOLED displays, the M35's 120Hz refresh rate provides a noticeable advantage in fluidity. The missing brightness data for the M35 is a critical gap.
  • Battery: The M35's massive 6000mAh battery promises significantly longer usage between charges. However, the Reno7 charges faster at 33W.
  • Camera: It's a close call; Reno7 boasts higher resolution sensors, but the M35 features a respected Sony sensor in its main camera and offers 4K video recording. A deeper dive into image quality samples is needed for a definitive conclusion.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Oppo Reno7: Suits users prioritizing a lightweight, compact design and a vibrant display. It's ideal for everyday tasks, social media, and casual photography.
  • Samsung Galaxy M35: Best for users who demand performance, long battery life, and the ability to capture high-quality videos. Gamers and power users will appreciate the M35 more.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What matters most: Performance or portability? If performance is paramount, the M35 is the clear winner. If a slim and light phone is crucial, the Reno7 excels.
  2. How important is battery life? The M35's larger battery offers a significant advantage for heavy users.
  3. What's your budget? Considering the performance difference, the M35 likely offers better value if priced competitively.

My Choice: While I appreciate the Reno7's sleek design, I'd choose the Samsung Galaxy M35. The significant performance advantage, coupled with the larger battery and 4K video recording, outweighs the bulkier build for me. However, the missing brightness data for the M35 gives me pause. If the M35's screen is dim, that would be a major drawback. Confirming the M35's display brightness is crucial before making a final decision. I prioritize a smooth, responsive experience and long battery life, and the M35 seems to deliver on both fronts, assuming reasonable screen brightness.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.