Oppo Reno6 5G vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 11, 2021 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 85.92 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 182 g 189 g
Height 156.8 mm 164.1 mm
Width 72.1 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 7.6 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • Aurora
  • Purple
  • Stellar Black
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.43 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.3 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 409 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 430 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 600 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 750 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.00 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.05 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4300 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

Oppo Reno6 5G vs. ZTE Blade A75 4G: A Practical Comparison

1. Specifications Breakdown

Design & Build

FeatureOppo Reno6 5G (2021)ZTE Blade A75 4G (2024)Real-World Implications
Dimensions156.8 × 72.1 × 7.6 mm164.1 × 75.8 × 8.6 mmZTE is larger and slightly thicker, less pocket-friendly but may offer better grip
Weight182g189gOppo is lighter, better for one-handed use
ProtectionGorilla Glass 5UnknownOppo has better drop resistance
Fingerprint SensorBasic under-displaySide-mountedZTE’s side sensor is faster and more ergonomic

Key Insight: Oppo wins in sleekness and durability, while ZTE offers a more practical fingerprint placement.


Display

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
Size6.43" AMOLED6.6" IPS LCDZTE’s screen is larger but lower quality
Resolution1080x2400 (409 PPI)720x1612 (267 PPI)Oppo is sharper (better for text/media)
Brightness1100 nits (peak)Unknown (likely ~500 nits)Oppo far superior in sunlight visibility
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth smooth for scrolling, but AMOLED advantage on Oppo

Key Insight: Oppo’s AMOLED display is leagues ahead—better colors, contrast, and outdoor visibility.


Performance

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
ChipsetDimensity 900 (6nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)Oppo’s chip is 3x faster (AnTuTu 815K vs. 240K)
GPUMali-G68 MC4Mali-G57 MP1Oppo better for gaming, AR apps
RAM8GB/12GB4GB/8GBOppo handles heavy multitasking better
Storage128GB/256GB (non-expandable)SameBoth have UFS storage, but Oppo has more RAM options

Key Insight: Oppo is a performance beast—ideal for gaming and power users. ZTE struggles with heavy tasks.


Camera

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
Main Camera50MP (Sony IMX766, OIS)50MP (unknown sensor)Oppo has better stabilization, low-light performance
Ultrawide16MPNoneOppo better for landscapes/group shots
Telephoto13MP (2x zoom)NoneOppo offers optical zoom
Selfie32MP8MPOppo’s front cam is 4x sharper
Video4K @ 30fps, 1080p @ 60fps1080p @ 30fpsOppo better for vlogging and clips

Key Insight: Oppo dominates with a versatile, high-end camera system. ZTE is basic—good for casual snaps only.


Battery & Charging

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhZTE lasts longer per charge (11% more)
Charging65W (0-100% in ~30 min)22.5W (slower)Oppo charges 3x faster

Key Insight: ZTE wins in endurance, Oppo in speed. Oppo’s fast charging is a game-changer.


2. Key Insights

Oppo Reno6 5G Strengths

Premium Display – AMOLED, 1100 nits, 90Hz = best in class.
Performance King – 3x faster than ZTE in benchmarks.
Superior Cameras – Telephoto, ultrawide, 4K video, OIS.
Blazing Charging – 65W is future-proof.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Strengths

Bigger Battery – 5000mAh = longer screen-on time.
Newer Software – Ships with Android 13 (vs. Oppo’s Android 11).
Side-Mounted Fingerprint – Faster unlock.

Trade-Offs:

  • ZTE’s display, performance, and cameras are budget-tier.
  • Oppo’s battery is smaller but charges much faster.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Who Should Buy the Oppo Reno6 5G?

Power Users – Gamers, multitaskers, creatives.
Photography Enthusiasts – Versatile camera system.
Design Lovers – Slimmer, premium build, AMOLED screen.

Who Should Buy the ZTE Blade A75 4G?

Budget Buyers – Cheaper (likely), decent battery.
Casual Users – Social media, calls, light apps.
Android 13 Seekers – Newer OS out of the box.


4. Buying Decision Framework

Ask Yourself:

  1. Do you prioritize performance and cameras?Oppo Reno6 5G.
  2. Do you need longer battery life on a budget?ZTE Blade A75 4G.
  3. Is software updates a dealbreaker?ZTE (Android 13, but Oppo may get updates too).

Scenarios:

  • Gaming & Media: Oppo (better GPU, AMOLED, 90Hz).
  • Long Travel Days: ZTE (5000mAh).
  • Photography: Oppo (no contest).

Final Verdict: What I’d Choose

Winner: Oppo Reno6 5G 🏆

Why?
The Oppo Reno6 5G is a flagship-tier device compared to ZTE’s budget offering. The AMOLED display, superior performance, and versatile cameras make it far more future-proof. While the ZTE has a bigger battery and newer software, the Oppo’s 65W charging compensates, and its hardware is simply in another league.

Only pick the ZTE if:

  • You absolutely need a bigger battery and don’t care about performance.
  • You’re on a tight budget and the Oppo is unavailable.

For everyone else, the Oppo Reno6 5G is the clear winner.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.