Oppo Reno6 5G vs Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 11, 2021 March 16, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 85.92 cm³ 95.71 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.58 "/g
Weight 182 g 179.5 g
Height 156.8 mm 159.9 mm
Width 72.1 mm 73.9 mm
Thickness 7.6 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • Aurora
  • Purple
  • Stellar Black
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black

Display

Screen Size 6.43 " 6.43 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.3 % 84.5 %
Pixel Density 409 PPI 409 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 430 nits 700 nits
HBM Brightness 600 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 750 nits 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.00 mAh/in² 120.93 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.05 mAh/cm³ 52.24 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4300 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

Oppo Reno6 5G vs Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro: A Practical Comparison

(June 2021 vs March 2022 Mid-Rangers)

1. Specifications Breakdown

Design & Build

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GXiaomi Poco M4 ProReal-World Implications
Dimensions156.8 × 72.1 × 7.6 mm159.9 × 73.9 × 8.1 mmPoco M4 Pro is slightly larger/heavier, but both are pocket-friendly.
Weight182g179.5gNegligible difference in handfeel.
Screen ProtectionGorilla Glass 5Gorilla Glass 3Reno6 5G has better scratch/drop resistance.

Takeaway: Oppo’s slimmer profile and tougher glass give it a durability edge, though both feel similar in daily use.


Display

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GXiaomi Poco M4 ProReal-World Implications
Panel6.43" AMOLED6.43" AMOLEDIdentical size/tech – vibrant colors, deep blacks.
Brightness1100 nitsNot specifiedReno6 5G is far more visible in sunlight.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzSmooth scrolling in apps/games on both.

Takeaway: The Reno6 5G’s superior brightness makes it the clear winner for outdoor use.


Performance

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GXiaomi Poco M4 ProReal-World Implications
ChipsetDimensity 900 (6nm)Helio G96 (12nm)Reno6 5G’s newer 6nm chip is more efficient.
AnTuTu Score815,200438,700Reno6 5G is ~86% faster (better for gaming/multitasking).
GPUMali-G68 MC4Mali-G57 MC2Reno6 5G handles high-settings gaming better.

Takeaway: The Reno6 5G is a powerhouse for its price, while the Poco M4 Pro lags in raw performance.


Camera

(Main Camera Comparison)
| Feature | Oppo Reno6 5G | Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro | Real-World Implications |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| Main Sensor | Sony IMX766 (1/1.56") | Samsung S5KJN1 (1/2.76") | Reno6 5G captures 48% more light (better low-light shots). |
| Ultrawide | 16MP (Sony IMX481) | 8MP (Sony IMX355) | Reno6 5G’s wider lens is sharper. |
| Selfie | 32MP (Sony IMX615) | 16MP (Omnivision OV16A10) | Oppo’s selfies are more detailed. |
| Video | 4K@30fps, OIS | 1080p@30fps | Reno6 5G is far better for vlogging. |

Takeaway: Oppo’s camera system is significantly more capable, especially in low light and video.


Battery & Charging

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GXiaomi Poco M4 ProReal-World Implications
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhPoco M4 Pro lasts ~10-15% longer per charge.
Charging Speed65W33WReno6 5G charges 2x faster (0-100% in ~30 mins).

Takeaway: Poco wins for battery life, but Oppo’s blazing charging compensates well.


2. Key Insights

Oppo Reno6 5G Wins At:

Performance (86% faster CPU/GPU)
Camera (larger sensors, 4K video, better selfies)
Display Brightness (1100 nits for sunlight visibility)
Fast Charging (65W vs 33W)

Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro Wins At:

Battery Life (5000mAh vs 4500mAh)
Audio (Dolby Atmos, stereo speakers)
Newer Release (9 months fresher)

Trade-Offs:

  • The Poco M4 Pro’s processor is weaker, leading to slower app/game performance.
  • Oppo’s camera hardware is superior, but Poco’s Night Mode software helps compensate.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Choose the Oppo Reno6 5G If You:

  • Prioritize speed (gaming, multitasking).
  • Take lots of photos/videos (better sensors, 4K support).
  • Want premium features (brighter screen, faster charging).

Choose the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro If You:

  • Need longer battery life (5000mAh vs 4500mAh).
  • Love media consumption (Dolby Atmos speakers).
  • Prefer newer software updates (released in 2022).

4. Buying Decision Framework

Ask Yourself:

  1. Do I care more about camera quality or battery life?
  2. Is gaming/performance critical, or is basic usage enough?
  3. Do I charge my phone quickly or need all-day endurance?

Scenarios:

  • Photographers/Vloggers: Reno6 5G (better cameras, 4K video).
  • Casual Users: Poco M4 Pro (cheaper, longer battery).
  • Power Users: Reno6 5G (faster chipset, 65W charging).

Final Verdict: Which Would I Choose?

Winner: Oppo Reno6 5G
Despite being older, the Reno6 5G outclasses the Poco M4 Pro in performance, cameras, display brightness, and charging speed—key areas that impact daily use. The Poco M4 Pro’s battery and audio are nice, but not enough to offset Oppo’s superior hardware.

Exception: If you only care about battery life or media playback, the Poco M4 Pro is a fair budget pick. But for most users, the Reno6 5G delivers far better value per dollar.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.