Oppo Reno6 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A22 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 11, 2021 July 1, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 85.92 cm³ 98.49 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.44 "/g
Weight 182 g 186 g
Height 156.8 mm 159.3 mm
Width 72.1 mm 73.6 mm
Thickness 7.6 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • Aurora
  • Purple
  • Stellar Black
  • Black
  • White
  • Violet
  • Mint

Display

Screen Size 6.43 " 6.4 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.3 % 84.3 %
Pixel Density 409 PPI 274 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 430 nits 600 nits
HBM Brightness 600 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 750 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.00 mAh/in² 122.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.05 mAh/cm³ 50.77 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4300 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 12 13

Comparison Summary

Oppo Reno6 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy A22: A Real-World Comparison

1. Specifications Breakdown

Design & Build Quality

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GSamsung Galaxy A22Real-World Implications
Dimensions156.8 × 72.1 × 7.6 mm159.3 × 73.6 × 8.4 mmOppo is slimmer & lighter, slightly easier to handle.
Weight182g186gNegligible difference in feel.
Screen ProtectionGorilla Glass 5UnknownOppo offers better drop protection.
Fingerprint SensorBasic (in-display)Side-mountedSide-mounted (A22) may be faster but less premium.

Verdict: The Reno6 5G is more compact, lighter, and has better screen protection, making it the sleeker choice.


Display

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GSamsung Galaxy A22Real-World Implications
Size6.43" AMOLED6.4" AMOLEDAlmost identical sizes.
Resolution1080x2400 (409 PPI)720x1600 (274 PPI)Oppo’s screen is sharper—better for media & text.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth smooth for scrolling.
Brightness1100 nitsUnknownOppo wins for outdoor visibility.

Verdict: The Reno6 5G has a far superior display—higher resolution, better brightness, and equal refresh rate.


Performance

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GSamsung Galaxy A22Real-World Implications
ChipsetDimensity 900 (6nm)Helio G80 (12nm)Oppo’s chip is faster & more efficient.
Antutu Score815,200379,800Oppo is over twice as fast—better for gaming & multitasking.
GPUMali-G68 MC4Mali-G52 MC2Oppo handles graphics better.
RAMUp to 12GBUnspecified (likely 4-6GB)Oppo is better for heavy apps.

Verdict: The Reno6 5G is a clear winner—it’s a flagship-tier midranger, while the A22 is more budget-friendly.


Camera

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GSamsung Galaxy A22Real-World Implications
Main Camera50MP (Sony IMX766)48MP (Samsung S5KGM2)Oppo has a larger sensor (better low light).
Ultrawide16MP (vs. A22’s 5MP)5MPOppo’s ultrawide is much sharper.
Telephoto13MP (2x zoom)NoneOppo has optical zoom—better for portraits.
Selfie32MP (vs. A22’s 8MP)8MPOppo’s selfies are significantly better.
Video Recording4K @ 60fps + OIS1080p @ 30fpsOppo is far superior for videography.

Verdict: The Reno6 5G is stronger in every camera category—better sensor, zoom, and video.


Battery & Charging

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GSamsung Galaxy A22Real-World Implications
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhA22 lasts longer, but…
Charging Speed65W (0-100% ~30m)15W (slow charging)Oppo wins—much faster charge time compensates for smaller battery.

Verdict: If you prioritize charging speed, Oppo is better. If battery endurance is key, A22 wins.


2. Key Insights

Oppo Reno6 5G Strengths:

Better display (1080p vs. 720p, way brighter)
Far superior performance (Dimensity 900 vs. Helio G80)
Much better cameras (50MP main, 32MP selfie, 4K video)
Faster charging (65W vs. 15W)

Samsung Galaxy A22 Strengths:

Bigger battery (5000mAh vs. 4500mAh)
Dolby Atmos audio (better sound)
More affordable (likely cheaper in most markets)

Trade-Offs:

  • Oppo Reno6 5G sacrifices battery capacity for fast charging and a premium build.
  • Samsung A22 has weaker performance & cameras, but lasts longer on a charge.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Who Should Buy the Oppo Reno6 5G?

  • Photography/Videography Enthusiasts – Better camera system.
  • Gamers & Power Users – Faster chipset, more RAM.
  • People Who Hate Slow Charging – 65W is a game-changer.

Who Should Buy the Samsung Galaxy A22?

  • Budget Users – Likely cheaper.
  • Long Battery Life Seekers – 5000mAh lasts longer.
  • Casual Users – If you don’t need high-end performance.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Ask Yourself These Questions:

  1. Do you care about camera & performance more than battery life?Oppo Reno6 5G
  2. Do you prefer long battery life over fast charging?Samsung A22
  3. Are you on a tight budget?Samsung A22

Scenario-Based Picks:

  • Best All-Around Experience: Oppo Reno6 5G
  • Best Battery Life: Samsung Galaxy A22
  • Best Budget Pick: Samsung Galaxy A22

Final Verdict: Which One Would I Choose?

Winner: Oppo Reno6 5G 🏆

Why?
The higher resolution screen, faster performance, better cameras, and blazing-fast charging make it the superior device overall. Unless you absolutely need the extra battery life of the A22, the Reno6 5G is the clear winner for most users.

If budget is a major factor, the Galaxy A22 is still a solid phone, but it falls short in speed, display, and cameras—areas where the Reno6 5G excels.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.