Oppo Reno6 5G vs Nokia X30 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia X30
Nokia X30
Nokia

General

Launch Date June 11, 2021 September 21, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 85.92 cm³ 93.94 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 182 g 185 g
Height 156.8 mm 158.9 mm
Width 72.1 mm 73.9 mm
Thickness 7.6 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • Aurora
  • Purple
  • Stellar Black
  • Cloudy Blue
  • Ice White

Display

Screen Size 6.43 " 6.43 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.3 % 85 %
Pixel Density 409 PPI 409 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 430 nits 450 nits
HBM Brightness 600 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 750 nits 700 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.00 mAh/in² 101.58 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.05 mAh/cm³ 44.71 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4300 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 12 13

Comparison Summary

Oppo Reno6 5G vs. Nokia X30: Detailed Comparison & Buying Guide

1. Specifications Breakdown

Design & Build Quality

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GNokia X30Real-World Implications
Dimensions156.8 × 72.1 × 7.6 mm158.9 × 73.9 × 8 mmNokia is slightly larger, but both are sleek and comfortable to hold.
Weight182g185gNegligible difference in everyday use.
Screen ProtectionGorilla Glass 5Gorilla Glass VictusNokia has better drop resistance (Victus is newer and tougher).
Water ResistanceNo official ratingIP67-ratedNokia is dust/water-resistant—better for outdoor use.

Takeaway:

  • Nokia wins in durability (IP67 + Victus glass), making it better for accident-prone users.
  • Oppo is slightly thinner and lighter but lacks ruggedness.

Display

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GNokia X30Real-World Implications
Size6.43" AMOLED6.43" AMOLEDIdentical size—good for one-handed use.
Resolution1080x2400 (409 PPI)1080x2400 (409 PPI)Same sharpness and clarity.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzSmooth scrolling in apps and games.
Brightness1100 nits(Not specified)Oppo has much better outdoor visibility—easier to see in sunlight.

Takeaway:

  • Tie in most aspects, but Oppo has a clear advantage in brightness, making it superior for outdoor use.

Performance

FeatureOppo Reno6 5G (Dimensity 900)Nokia X30 (Snapdragon 695)Real-World Implications
AnTuTu Score815,200410,072Oppo is nearly twice as fast—better for gaming & multitasking.
GPUMali-G68 MC4Adreno 619Oppo has better graphics performance for demanding games.
RAM Options8GB / 12GB6GB / 8GBOppo’s higher RAM helps with heavy multitasking.

Takeaway:

  • Oppo is the clear winner for performance—better chipset, benchmark scores, and RAM options.
  • Nokia’s Snapdragon 695 is mid-range and struggles with high-end gaming.

Camera

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GNokia X30Real-World Implications
Main Camera50MP (Sony IMX766, f/1.8)50MP (f/1.8)Similar daylight performance, but Oppo’s Sony sensor may edge ahead in low light.
Ultrawide16MP (f/2.2)13MP (f/2.4)Oppo has a wider field of view and better aperture.
Telephoto13MP (2x zoom)❌ NoneOppo offers better versatility for portraits and zooming.
Macro Lens2MP (gimmicky)❌ NoneNeither phone excels here.
Selfie Camera32MP (Sony IMX615)16MPOppo has higher resolution and better detail.
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps1080p@60fps onlyOppo supports 4K—better for content creators.

Takeaway:

  • Oppo wins decisively—better ultrawide, telephoto, selfie, and video recording.
  • Nokia lacks zoom and 4K video, limiting versatility.

Battery & Charging

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GNokia X30Real-World Implications
Capacity4500mAh4200mAhOppo has a slight edge (7% more capacity).
Charging65W fast charging33W fast chargingOppo charges twice as fast (~30 min vs. ~60 min for full charge).

Takeaway:

  • Oppo wins—larger battery and significantly faster charging.

2. Key Insights & Trade-Offs

Oppo Reno6 5G Strengths:

Superior performance (better chipset, GPU, and RAM)
Better cameras (telephoto, 4K video, higher-res selfie)
Brighter display (1100 nits for outdoor use)
Faster charging (65W vs. Nokia’s 33W)

Nokia X30 Strengths:

More durable (IP67 rating + Gorilla Glass Victus)
Cleaner software (stock Android, longer updates)

Trade-Offs:

  • Oppo lacks water resistance and uses ColorOS (heavier skin).
  • Nokia sacrifices performance, camera versatility, and fast charging.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Who Should Pick the Oppo Reno6 5G?

Power users & gamers (better processor & GPU)
Photography enthusiasts (more versatile camera system)
Fast-charging lovers (65W is a game-changer)

Who Should Pick the Nokia X30?

Durability-focused users (IP67 + Gorilla Glass Victus)
Stock Android fans (cleaner, longer updates)
Casual users (decent for basics, but not heavy tasks)


4. Buying Decision Framework

Ask Yourself:

  1. Do you need a fast, powerful phone for gaming/multitasking?Oppo
  2. Is durability (water/dust resistance) a priority?Nokia
  3. Do you care about camera versatility (zoom, 4K video, selfies)?Oppo

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • "I take lots of photos and videos"Oppo Reno6 5G
  • "I drop my phone often & hate bloatware"Nokia X30
  • "I need a phone that charges in 30 minutes"Oppo Reno6 5G

Final Verdict: Which Would I Choose?

I’d pick the Oppo Reno6 5G.

Why?

  • It’s much faster (Dimensity 900 vs. Snapdragon 695).
  • The camera system is superior (telephoto, 4K video, better selfies).
  • 65W charging is a huge convenience.
  • Brighter screen makes outdoor use easier.

The Nokia X30’s durability and clean software are appealing, but Oppo’s performance, camera, and charging speed make it the better all-rounder for most users. Unless you really need IP67 or hate ColorOS, the Oppo Reno6 5G is the smarter choice.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.