Oppo Reno6 5G vs Nokia C32 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C32
Nokia C32
Nokia

General

Launch Date June 11, 2021 February 25, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 85.92 cm³ 107.44 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.26 "/g
Weight 182 g 199.4 g
Height 156.8 mm 164.6 mm
Width 72.1 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 7.6 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • Aurora
  • Purple
  • Stellar Black
  • Charcoal
  • Autumn Green
  • Beach Pink

Display

Screen Size 6.43 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.3 % 81.6 %
Pixel Density 409 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness 430 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 600 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 750 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.00 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.05 mAh/cm³ 46.54 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4300 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) Unisoc SC9863A1 (22 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 IMG8322

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

Oppo Reno6 5G vs. Nokia C32: A Detailed Comparison

These two smartphones cater to very different audiences—the Oppo Reno6 5G is a mid-range performance and camera-focused device, while the Nokia C32 is a budget-friendly option with an emphasis on battery life and simplicity. Below, we break down the key differences and explain what they mean in real-world usage.


1. Specifications Breakdown

Design & Build Quality

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GNokia C32Real-World Implications
Dimensions156.8 × 72.1 × 7.6 mm164.6 × 75.9 × 8.6 mmOppo is sleeker, lighter (182g vs. 199.4g)—better for one-handed use. Nokia is bulkier but may feel more durable.
Screen ProtectionGorilla Glass 5No specified protectionOppo is more resistant to scratches and minor drops.
Fingerprint SensorBasic (under-display)Side-mountedNokia’s sensor may be more ergonomic, but Oppo’s is more modern.

Verdict: The Oppo Reno6 5G wins in design with a slimmer profile, lighter weight, and better screen protection.


Display

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GNokia C32Real-World Implications
Screen Size6.43" AMOLED6.5" IPS LCDOppo’s AMOLED has richer colors, deeper blacks, and better sunlight visibility (1100 nits vs. unknown for Nokia).
Resolution1080x2400 (409 PPI)720x1600 (270 PPI)Oppo’s display is much sharper—text, videos, and games look crisper.
Refresh Rate90Hz60HzOppo offers smoother scrolling and animations.

Verdict: The Oppo Reno6 5G dominates in display quality—superior brightness, contrast, and sharpness make it a better choice for media consumption.


Performance

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GNokia C32Real-World Implications
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 900 (6nm)Unisoc SC9863A1 (22nm)Oppo’s chip is significantly faster—better for gaming and multitasking.
RAM8GB/12GB3GB/4GBOppo handles heavy apps effortlessly; Nokia struggles with more than a few apps open.
Storage128GB/256GB (no expandable)64GB/128GB (no expandable)Oppo offers more storage, but neither supports microSD.
AnTuTu Score815,200109,200Oppo is 7x faster—night-and-day difference in performance.

Verdict: The Oppo Reno6 5G is vastly superior in speed, efficiency, and future-proofing. The Nokia C32 is only suitable for very light usage.


Camera

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GNokia C32Real-World Implications
Main Camera50MP (Sony IMX766, OIS)50MP (no OIS)Oppo has better stabilization, sensor quality, and detail.
Ultra-Wide16MPNoneOppo allows for wider landscape shots.
Telephoto13MP (2x zoom)NoneOppo enables optical zoom, better for portraits.
Selfie32MP (Sony IMX615)8MPOppo’s selfies are much sharper, better in low light.
Video Recording4K @ 30/60fps, 1080p @ 240fps1080p @ 30fpsOppo is far superior for vlogging and creative video.

Verdict: The Oppo Reno6 5G is a clear winner—better hardware, more versatility, and professional-grade video capabilities.


Battery & Charging

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GNokia C32Real-World Implications
Battery Capacity4500mAh5000mAhNokia lasts longer on a single charge.
Charging Speed65W fast charging10W slow chargingOppo charges fully in ~30 mins; Nokia takes ~2+ hours.

Verdict: Nokia has more endurance, but Oppo’s blazing-fast charging makes up for it.


2. Key Insights

Oppo Reno6 5G Strengths:

Best display (AMOLED, 90Hz, 1100 nits brightness)
Powerful performance (Dimensity 900, 8GB+ RAM)
Superior cameras (multi-lens setup, 4K video, OIS)
Ultra-fast charging (65W vs. Nokia’s 10W)

Nokia C32 Strengths:

Bigger battery (5000mAh)
Newer OS (Android 13 out of the box)
Cheaper (budget-friendly option)

Trade-offs:

Oppo Reno6 5G: Slightly smaller battery, older OS (Android 11, upgradable to 12).
Nokia C32: Weak performance, low-res screen, basic cameras.


3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Who Should Buy the Oppo Reno6 5G?

Content creators (great cameras, 4K video)
Gamers & power users (fast chip, smooth display)
Media lovers (AMOLED screen, high brightness)

Who Should Buy the Nokia C32?

Light users (basic calls, texts, social media)
Budget-conscious buyers (lower upfront cost)
Battery-first users (longer runtime per charge)


4. Buying Decision Framework

Ask Yourself:

  1. Do I care about performance & camera quality?Oppo Reno6 5G
  2. Is battery life my top priority?Nokia C32
  3. Am I on a tight budget?Nokia C32

Scenario-Based Picks:

  • Best overall experience?Oppo Reno6 5G
  • Cheapest phone that works?Nokia C32
  • Future-proofing & gaming?Oppo Reno6 5G

Final Verdict: Which Would I Choose?

I’d pick the Oppo Reno6 5G without hesitation. The far superior display, performance, cameras, and charging speed make it a vastly better device for most users. The Nokia C32 only makes sense if you strictly need long battery life or can’t afford anything else.

For anyone who values a premium experience at a mid-range price, the Oppo Reno6 5G is the clear winner. 🚀

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.