Oppo Reno6 5G vs Motorola Razr 50 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola

General

Launch Date June 11, 2021 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 85.92 cm³ 92.54 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 182 g 188.4 g
Height 156.8 mm 171.3 mm
Width 72.1 mm 74 mm
Thickness 7.6 mm 7.3 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • Aurora
  • Purple
  • Stellar Black
  • Koala Grey (Steel Wool)
  • Beach Sand (Pumice Stone)
  • Spritz Orange (Arabesque)

Display

Screen Size 6.43 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.3 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 409 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 430 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 600 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 750 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.00 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.05 mAh/cm³ 45.39 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4300 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

Oppo Reno6 5G vs. Motorola Razr 50: Detailed Comparison

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GMotorola Razr 50Real-World Implications
Design
Form FactorStandard slabFoldable (clamshell)Razr 50 is more compact when folded; Reno6 is slimmer but not pocket-friendly.
Dimensions156.8 × 72.1 × 7.6mm171.3 × 74 × 7.3mm (unfolded)Razr 50 is taller but thinner; Reno6 feels more balanced in hand.
Weight182g188.4gNegligible difference, but Razr 50 may feel slightly heavier due to hinge mechanism.
Display
Size6.43" AMOLED6.9" (main, unfolded)Razr 50 offers more screen real estate; Reno6 is still sharp but smaller.
Resolution1080 × 24001080 × 2640Similar sharpness (PPI ~409 vs. 413).
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzRazr 50 feels smoother in scrolling/gaming.
Brightness1100 nits (peak)3000 nits (peak)Razr 50 is vastly better outdoors. Reno6 struggles in bright sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetDimensity 900 (6nm)Dimensity 7300X (4nm)Razr 50 is more efficient; Reno6 has higher benchmark scores but older architecture.
AnTuTu Score815,200620,395Reno6 benchmarks better, but Razr 50’s real-world performance may feel more optimized.
RAM & Storage8/12GB + 128/256GB8/12GB + 256/512GBRazr 50 offers more storage flexibility.
Camera
Main Camera50MP (Sony IMX766)50MP (unknown sensor)Similar on paper, but Reno6 likely better in low light due to larger pixels (1.0µm vs. 0.7µm).
Ultrawide16MP13MPReno6 has slightly better ultrawide resolution.
Telephoto/Macro13MP telephoto, 2MP macroNoneReno6 offers better zoom and macro shots. Razr 50 lacks versatility.
Selfie32MP (punch-hole)32MP (cover display + main cam)Razr 50 allows selfies via main cam for better quality.
Video4K@30fps, OIS, 240fps slow-mo4K@30fps, EIS, 120fps slow-moReno6 has better stabilization (OIS) and smoother slow-motion.
Battery
Capacity4500mAh4200mAhReno6 lasts slightly longer on a charge.
Charging65W wired30W wired + 15W wirelessReno6 charges faster wired; Razr 50 adds wireless charging convenience.
SoftwareAndroid 11 (up to 12)Android 14 (newer)Razr 50 offers longer software support and newer features.
Miscellaneous
AudioSingle speakerStereo speakers, Dolby AtmosRazr 50 has superior sound quality.
ProtectionGorilla Glass 5Gorilla Glass VictusRazr 50 has better drop resistance.

2. Key Insights

Oppo Reno6 5G Strengths

Better camera versatility (telephoto + macro lenses)
Faster wired charging (65W vs. 30W)
Higher benchmark performance (though real-world difference may be minor)
Slightly larger battery (4500mAh vs. 4200mAh)

Motorola Razr 50 Strengths

Foldable design (compact when closed, large screen when open)
Brighter, smoother display (3000 nits, 120Hz)
Newer software & longer support (Android 14 vs. Reno6’s Android 11)
Better audio & protection (stereo speakers, Gorilla Glass Victus)

Trade-Offs & Limitations

  • Reno6 5G has an older OS and may not get future updates.
  • Razr 50 lacks a telephoto lens and has a smaller battery.
  • Foldable durability is still a concern vs. traditional slab phones.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Choose the Oppo Reno6 5G if you:

Prioritize camera flexibility (telephoto, macro shooting)
Need faster charging (65W is significantly quicker)
Want a more traditional phone (no foldable concerns)

Choose the Motorola Razr 50 if you:

Love foldable designs (more compact & futuristic feel)
Need a brighter screen (great for outdoor visibility)
Want better speakers & durability (Dolby Atmos, Gorilla Glass Victus)


4. Buying Decision Framework

Ask yourself:

  1. Do I care about the foldable form factor?
    • If yes, Razr 50 is the obvious pick.
    • If no, Reno6 5G offers better value.
  2. How important is camera versatility?
    • If you shoot zoom or macro, Reno6 wins.
    • If you mostly take standard/selfie shots, Razr 50 is fine.
  3. Do I need long-term software support?
    • Razr 50 (Android 14) will likely get more updates.

Final Verdict: What I’d Choose

I’d go with the Motorola Razr 50.

Why?

  • The foldable design is a game-changer for portability and novelty.
  • 3000-nit display makes outdoor use effortless.
  • Stereo speakers & Dolby Atmos enhance media consumption.
  • Newer software ensures better longevity.

While the Oppo Reno6 5G has a better camera setup and faster charging, the Razr 50’s unique design, display quality, and fresh software make it the more compelling choice for most users—especially if you want something different from a standard slab phone.

Would you pick the foldable future or the practical powerhouse? Let me know your thoughts! 🚀

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.