Oppo Reno6 5G vs Motorola Moto G73 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 11, 2021 January 24, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 85.92 cm³ 98.86 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.59 "/g
Weight 182 g 181 g
Height 156.8 mm 161.4 mm
Width 72.1 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 7.6 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • Aurora
  • Purple
  • Stellar Black
  • Midnight Blue
  • Lucent White

Display

Screen Size 6.43 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.3 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 409 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 430 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 600 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 750 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.00 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.05 mAh/cm³ 50.57 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4300 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 IMG BXM-8-256

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

Oppo Reno6 5G vs. Motorola Moto G73: A Practical Showdown

1. Specifications Breakdown

Design & Build

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GMotorola Moto G73Real-World Implications
Dimensions156.8 × 72.1 × 7.6 mm161.4 × 73.8 × 8.3 mmMoto G73 is slightly larger and thicker, making it a bit bulkier in hand.
Weight182g181gVirtually identical.
Screen ProtectionGorilla Glass 5Unknown (likely weaker)Oppo offers better drop protection.
Fingerprint SensorBasic (under-display?)Side-mountedMoto G73’s placement is more accessible but risks accidental touches.

🔹 Takeaway:

  • The Reno6 5G is sleeker and better protected, while the Moto G73 has a more ergonomic fingerprint sensor.

Display

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GMotorola Moto G73Real-World Implications
Size6.43" AMOLED6.5" IPS LCDOppo’s AMOLED wins for contrast, vibrancy, and power efficiency.
Resolution1080x2400 (409 PPI)1080x2400 (405 PPI)No noticeable sharpness difference.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzMoto G73 feels slightly smoother in scrolling/gaming, but AMOLED still looks better.
Brightness1100 nits (peak)Unknown (likely dimmer)Oppo is vastly better in sunlight.

🔹 Takeaway:

  • For media lovers: Oppo’s AMOLED is superior (deeper blacks, better colors, outdoor visibility).
  • For smoother UI: Moto G73’s 120Hz is a slight advantage, but Oppo’s 90Hz is still fluid.

Performance

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GMotorola Moto G73Real-World Implications
ChipsetDimensity 900 (6nm)Dimensity 930 (6nm)Both mid-range, but Oppo benchmarks 64% higher (815K vs. 497K).
GPUMali-G68 MC4IMG BXM-8-256Oppo’s GPU is better optimized for gaming.
RAM Options8GB / 12GB8GBOppo’s 12GB variant is better for heavy multitasking.

🔹 Takeaway:

  • Despite being older, the Oppo Reno6 5G performs significantly better in benchmarks and gaming.
  • The Moto G73’s newer chipset doesn’t translate to real-world speed gains.

Camera

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GMotorola Moto G73Real-World Implications
Main Camera50MP (Sony IMX766)50MP (generic)Oppo’s sensor is flagship-grade (better low light and detail).
Ultrawide16MP (Sony IMX481)8MPOppo’s ultrawide is vastly superior (twice the resolution).
Telephoto13MP (2x optical zoom)NoneOppo offers real zoom; Moto relies on digital crop.
Selfie32MP (Sony IMX615)16MPOppo’s selfies have far more detail.
Video4K@30/60fps, OIS1080p@30/60fps, EISOppo is much better for vlogging and stabilization.

🔹 Takeaway:

  • The Reno6 5G is a photography powerhouse—better sensors, more lenses, and superior video.
  • The Moto G73 has basic cameras, suitable for casual shots only.

Battery & Charging

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GMotorola Moto G73Real-World Implications
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhMoto G73 lasts longer (11% more battery).
Charging Speed65W (full in ~30 min)30W (slower)Oppo charges twice as fast.
EfficiencyAMOLED helps batteryIPS LCD drains moreOppo’s display helps offset the smaller battery.

🔹 Takeaway:

  • Moto G73 lasts longer on a single charge.
  • Oppo charges way faster—better for quick top-ups.

2. Key Insights

Oppo Reno6 5G Wins If You Want:

Superior cameras (flagship-level sensors, telephoto, 4K video).
Faster performance (better GPU, higher benchmark scores).
Better display (AMOLED, higher brightness, deeper blacks).
Faster charging (65W vs. 30W).

Motorola Moto G73 Wins If You Want:

Longer battery life (5000mAh vs. 4500mAh).
Newer software (Android 13 vs. Android 11, though Oppo has updates to 12).
Smoother refresh rate (120Hz, but on an inferior LCD panel).


3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Best for Photography & PerformanceOppo Reno6 5G

  • Who? Content creators, mobile gamers, power users.
  • Why? Flagship-grade cameras, faster chipset, AMOLED screen.

Best for Battery & BudgetMotorola Moto G73

  • Who? Casual users, those who prioritize battery endurance.
  • Why? Bigger battery, newer software, decent performance.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Ask yourself:

  1. Do I care about camera quality?Oppo Reno6 5G.
  2. Do I need all-day battery?Moto G73.
  3. Do I prefer faster performance and charging?Oppo Reno6 5G.

Final Verdict: What I’d Choose

Winner: Oppo Reno6 5G 🏆

Why?

  • The camera system is miles ahead—flagship-grade sensors, 4K video, and a telephoto lens.
  • Performance is better despite being older (higher benchmark scores).
  • AMOLED display vs. LCD—no contest.
  • 65W charging is a game-changer for quick power-ups.

The Moto G73 is a solid budget option, but the Oppo Reno6 5G offers far better value for photography, speed, and display quality—making it the clear winner.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.