Oppo Reno6 5G vs Motorola Moto G72 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 11, 2021 October 3, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 85.92 cm³ 94.34 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.98 "/g
Weight 182 g 166 g
Height 156.8 mm 160.5 mm
Width 72.1 mm 74.4 mm
Thickness 7.6 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • Aurora
  • Purple
  • Stellar Black
  • Meteorite Gray
  • Polar Blue
  • Mineral White

Display

Screen Size 6.43 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.3 % 88.1 %
Pixel Density 409 PPI 402 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 430 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 600 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 750 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.00 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.05 mAh/cm³ 53 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4300 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

Oppo Reno6 5G vs. Motorola Moto G72: A Practical Comparison

Choosing between these two mid-range contenders depends on whether you prioritize raw performance and camera versatility (Oppo Reno6 5G) or battery life and a smoother display (Motorola Moto G72). Here’s a detailed breakdown to help you decide.


1. Specifications Breakdown

Design & Build

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GMotorola Moto G72Real-World Implications
Dimensions156.8 × 72.1 × 7.6 mm160.5 × 74.4 × 7.9 mmMoto G72 is slightly larger, but Oppo is more compact and easier to handle.
Weight182g166gMoto G72 is 16g lighter, making it more comfortable for long use.
Screen ProtectionGorilla Glass 5No data (likely basic)Oppo has better drop resistance.

Verdict: Oppo feels slightly more premium, but Moto G72 is lighter.


Display

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GMotorola Moto G72Real-World Implications
Size & Type6.43" AMOLED6.6" P-OLEDMoto G72 has a slightly bigger screen, but both are vivid and sharp.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzMoto G72 offers smoother scrolling/gaming.
Brightness1100 nitsNo data (likely ~700 nits)Oppo is far better in sunlight.
Resolution & PPI1080x2400 (409 PPI)1080x2400 (402 PPI)Nearly indistinguishable in clarity.

Verdict: Oppo wins for outdoor visibility, while Moto G72 has a smoother display.


Performance & Software

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GMotorola Moto G72Real-World Implications
ChipsetDimensity 900 (6nm)Helio G99 (6nm)Oppo’s chipset is significantly faster (Antutu: 815K vs. 415K).
RAM Options8GB / 12GB6GB / 8GBOppo handles heavy multitasking better.
OS & UpdatesAndroid 11 (up to 12)Android 12Moto G72 has a newer OS but lacks update clarity.

Verdict: Oppo is the clear winner for gaming and performance.


Camera

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GMotorola Moto G72Real-World Implications
Main Camera50MP (f/1.8, OIS, Sony IMX766)108MP (f/1.7)Moto G72 has higher MP but Oppo has better sensor and stabilization.
Ultrawide16MP (f/2.2)8MP (f/1.9)Oppo has sharper ultrawide shots.
Telephoto13MP (2x optical zoom)✖️ NoneOppo offers better zoom versatility.
Selfie32MP (f/2.4)16MPOppo’s selfies are more detailed.
Video4K@30fps (OIS, EIS)1080p@60fps (No OIS)Oppo is better for videography.

Verdict: Oppo wins for versatility (zoom, stabilization, video). Moto G72 has a higher-res main sensor but lacks optical zoom and 4K video.


Battery & Charging

FeatureOppo Reno6 5GMotorola Moto G72Real-World Implications
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhMoto G72 lasts longer on a single charge.
Charging Speed65W fast charging33W fast chargingOppo charges twice as fast.
Battery TechLi-PolymerLi-IonOppo may have better longevity.

Verdict: Moto G72 lasts longer, but Oppo charges faster.


2. Key Insights

Oppo Reno6 5G Strengths:

Much faster performance (Dimensity 900 vs. Helio G99).
Better camera system (OIS, telephoto, 4K video).
Brighter display (great for outdoor use).
Faster charging (65W vs. 33W).

Motorola Moto G72 Strengths:

Larger battery (5000mAh) for longer endurance.
Smoother 120Hz display (vs. 90Hz).
Lighter and slightly bigger screen.
Dolby Atmos stereo speakers (better audio).


3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Best for Oppo Reno6 5G:

Mobile gamers (better chipset & GPU).
Photography & videography lovers (OIS, 4K video, zoom lens).
Fast-charging fans (65W refuels in ~30 mins).

Best for Motorola Moto G72:

Long battery life seekers (5000mAh + efficient chipset).
Media consumers (120Hz, Dolby Atmos stereo speakers).
Budget-conscious users (if priced lower than Oppo).


4. Buying Decision Framework

Ask yourself:

  1. Do I care more about performance or battery life? (Oppo = speed, Moto = endurance.)
  2. Do I need a telephoto lens and 4K video? (Oppo wins here.)
  3. Do I prefer a smoother display (120Hz) or better outdoor visibility (1100 nits)?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • For gaming & photographyOppo Reno6 5G
  • For media & battery lifeMotorola Moto G72

Final Verdict: Which One Would I Choose?

I’d pick the Oppo Reno6 5G.

Why?

  • The performance gap (Dimensity 900 vs. Helio G99) is too big to ignore.
  • Camera versatility (OIS, telephoto, 4K video) makes it a better all-rounder.
  • Fast charging (65W) compensates for the smaller battery.

The Moto G72 is great if you prioritize battery life and a smoother display, but the Oppo Reno6 5G is the better-balanced device overall for most users.

Your choice depends on your priorities—speed and cameras (Oppo) or endurance and smoothness (Moto). 🚀

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.