Oppo Reno5 5G vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 7, 2021 May 13, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 92.26 cm³ 100.96 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.74 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 172 g 204 g
Height 159.1 mm 163.3 mm
Width 73.4 mm 73.6 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Starry Black
  • Galactic Silver
  • Azure Blue
  • Silver
  • Gold
  • Black

Display

Screen Size 6.43 " 6.8 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1116 x 2480
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.5 % 92.9 %
Pixel Density 409 PPI 400 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 430 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 750 nits 1500 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.00 mAh/in² 108.13 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.61 mAh/cm³ 49.53 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4300 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 620 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.1, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 12 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the Oppo Reno5 5G and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, focusing on practical implications for the user:

Design

FeatureOppo Reno5 5GZTE Axon 40 UltraPractical Impact
Dimensions159.1 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm163.3 x 73.6 x 8.4 mmZTE Axon 40 Ultra is slightly larger and thicker, may feel less pocketable for some users.
Weight172g204gOppo Reno5 5G is noticeably lighter, better for one-handed use and prolonged holding.
BuildUnknownUnknownThe body material is not specified for both phones.

Display

FeatureOppo Reno5 5GZTE Axon 40 UltraPractical Impact
Size6.43"6.8"ZTE Axon 40 Ultra has a larger screen for more immersive media consumption and gaming.
Resolution1080x24001116x2480ZTE Axon 40 Ultra has a slightly sharper display, but difference is not drastically noticeable in day to day use.
PPI409400Both displays are equally sharp to the human eye.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors, deep blacks, and good contrast.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzZTE Axon 40 Ultra provides smoother scrolling and animations, a more fluid user experience overall.
Brightness750 nits1500 nitsZTE Axon 40 Ultra is much better suited for outdoor use in bright sunlight, with twice the screen brightness.

Performance

FeatureOppo Reno5 5GZTE Axon 40 UltraPractical Impact
ChipsetSnapdragon 765G (7 nm)Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)ZTE Axon 40 Ultra has a much more powerful processor, providing significantly faster app loading, smoother multitasking and better gaming.
AnTuTu Score325,0001,061,300ZTE Axon 40 Ultra's performance is substantially higher, resulting in a much better overall performance.
GPUAdreno 620Adreno 730ZTE Axon 40 Ultra offers significantly superior graphics performance, for better gaming and video processing.

Camera

FeatureOppo Reno5 5GZTE Axon 40 UltraPractical Impact
Main Camera64MP, f/1.7, 1/1.7"64MP, f/1.6, 1/1.72"ZTE Axon 40 Ultra's slightly wider aperture may result in better low-light performance; Oppo Reno5 5G’s larger sensor may have a slight edge in capturing light and details.
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.416MP, f/2.0Oppo Reno5 5G has a higher resolution selfie camera; ZTE Axon 40 Ultra has a wider aperture which might be better in low light scenarios.
TelephotoNot Available64MP, f/3.5, 1/2"ZTE Axon 40 Ultra offers dedicated telephoto zoom for zoomed shots, while Oppo Reno5 5G lacks optical zoom.
Macro2MP, f/2.4Not AvailableOppo Reno5 5G has a dedicated macro camera for close-up photography; ZTE Axon 40 Ultra lacks a dedicated macro lens.
Wide Angle + Macro8MP, f/2.264MP, f/2.3ZTE Axon 40 Ultra has higher resolution wide-angle camera. Oppo Reno5 5G has a wider aperture which might be better in low light scenarios.
ToF 3D sensorNot Available0.3MPZTE Axon 40 Ultra includes a ToF 3D sensor, but the practical application of a 0.3MP ToF sensor in image capturing is limited.
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@120fps8K@30fps, 4K@120fpsZTE Axon 40 Ultra records higher quality video, up to 8K; Both offer different stabilization technologies.

Battery

FeatureOppo Reno5 5GZTE Axon 40 UltraPractical Impact
Capacity4300mAh5000mAhZTE Axon 40 Ultra's larger battery will likely offer longer battery life, especially with demanding tasks.
Charging65W Fast65W FastBoth offer rapid charging, minimizing downtime.
FeaturesReverse charging, dual-cellNoneOppo Reno5 5G can charge other devices wirelessly and may have slightly better battery performance with the dual-cell design.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Reno5 5G Advantages:

  • Lighter and More Compact: The Oppo Reno5 5G is significantly lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use and better for those who prefer smaller phones.
  • Reverse Charging: It can wirelessly charge other devices, a convenient feature for users with compatible accessories.
  • Dedicated Macro Lens: For users who enjoy close-up photography, the dedicated macro lens is a plus.
  • Additional Audio Features: Dolby Atmos support enhances audio for compatible media.
  • Better Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 3+ offers a better level of protection than the unknown one of the ZTE.

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Advantages:

  • Significantly More Powerful: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 provides a substantial performance boost, making the phone much faster for gaming and demanding apps.
  • Larger and Brighter Display: The larger screen with higher brightness is superior for media consumption, gaming, and outdoor use.
  • Better Main Camera System: The inclusion of a telephoto lens and a higher-resolution wide-angle lens provides more flexibility.
  • Higher Resolution and Frame Rate Video Recording: 8k and 4k 120 fps recording.
  • Larger Battery: The 5000mAh battery offers longer usage time.
  • More Internal Storage Options: The 1TB storage is great for heavy multimedia users.
  • Newer WiFi and Bluetooth Standards: Supports WiFi 6 and Bluetooth 5.2 for better wireless connectivity.

Trade-offs:

  • The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is heavier and bulkier.
  • The Oppo Reno5 5G has a weaker chipset.
  • The Oppo Reno5 5G lacks a telephoto lens.
  • The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra lacks a macro lens.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Reno5 5G Ideal User:

  • Everyday Users: Those who prioritize a lightweight and comfortable phone for daily tasks.
  • Budget Conscious: Likely cheaper than the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra.
  • Casual Photographers: Users who enjoy macro photography and are satisfied with general photo quality.
  • Users who occasionally need reverse wireless charging.

Use Cases:

  • Daily social media, browsing, and communication.
  • Casual gaming and app usage.
  • Good for users looking for a compact phone

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Ideal User:

  • Power Users: Users who demand high performance for gaming, video editing, and intensive multitasking.
  • Media Consumers: Those who enjoy watching videos and movies on their phones.
  • Photographers: Users who want a versatile camera system with telephoto capabilities and 8K video recording.
  • Users who want the latest features and technology.

Use Cases:

  • Demanding mobile gaming.
  • High-quality video recording and editing.
  • Immersive media consumption.
  • Users needing plenty of storage.
  • Excellent for outdoor use due to the screen brightness.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is my priority: performance or portability? If portability and ergonomics are paramount, the Oppo Reno5 5G is a better choice. If performance is king, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is the obvious winner.
  2. How important is camera versatility to me? If you need a telephoto lens for zoomed shots and professional quality video recording the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is superior. However, if macro is a must, then Oppo Reno5 is the only choice.
  3. What is my budget? The Oppo Reno5 5G will likely be the more affordable option.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Budget-Conscious Everyday Use:
    • Recommendation: The Oppo Reno5 5G is a more affordable option with enough power and features for casual use.
  • Scenario 2: High-Performance Mobile Gaming & Heavy Multitasking:
    • Recommendation: The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a clear choice due to its powerful processor, superior graphics performance, and large battery.
  • Scenario 3: Mobile Photography & Videography Enthusiast
    • Recommendation: The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, with its telephoto lens and superior video capabilities, is the better choice.
  • Scenario 4: Users who need a smaller phone.
    • Recommendation: The Oppo Reno5 5G is the better option due to being smaller, lighter and more compact.

My Choice:

If I were to choose between these two phones, I would choose the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra. Despite its larger size and weight, the significant advantages in performance, display quality, camera versatility, and battery life outweigh the drawbacks. The newer chipset and higher refresh rate would result in a more responsive and enjoyable user experience. While the Oppo Reno5 5G is a competent phone, it falls short for my usage needs due to its older chipset and lack of a telephoto camera. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, with its overall superiority in the key features I value, is the better choice for me despite its bulkier form factor and slightly higher price. I would prioritize better performance and display over a more compact device and reverse wireless charging.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.