Oppo Reno5 5G vs Sony Xperia 1 VI - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 7, 2021 June 3, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 92.26 cm³ 98.3 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.74 "/g 3.39 "/g
Weight 172 g 192 g
Height 159.1 mm 162 mm
Width 73.4 mm 74 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Starry Black
  • Galactic Silver
  • Azure Blue
  • Black
  • Platinum silver
  • Khaki green
  • Scar red

Display

Screen Size 6.43 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.5 % 86.5 %
Pixel Density 409 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 430 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 750 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.00 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.61 mAh/cm³ 50.86 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4300 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 620 Adreno 750

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, Video Output

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 12 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureOppo Reno5 5GSony Xperia 1 VIPractical Impact
Dimensions159.1 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm162 x 74 x 8.2 mmThe Xperia is slightly taller and thicker, meaning it might be slightly less comfortable for one-handed use, and less pocketable.
Weight172g192gThe Oppo is significantly lighter, which is noticeable during long periods of use and feels more comfortable in hand for extended periods.
BuildCorning Gorilla Glass 3+ screenCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 screenThe Sony offers superior drop and scratch resistance, making it more durable in the long run.

Display

FeatureOppo Reno5 5GSony Xperia 1 VIPractical Impact
Size6.43"6.5"Both have very similar screen sizes, offering a similar immersive experience. The difference is minor.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2340Very similar clarity levels.
PPI409396Both offer crisp visuals, with very little difference in pixel density that isn't noticeable in daily usage.
TechnologyAMOLEDOLEDBoth technologies provide vibrant colors and deep blacks, with comparable visual experiences.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzThe Sony's 120Hz refresh rate provides smoother animations and scrolling, which is very noticeable for gamers or those who use their phones intensively.
Brightness750 nits0 nitsThe Oppo has much better outdoor visibility under bright sunlight, as the Sony brightness is not specified, making it difficult to be used in sunlight.

Performance

FeatureOppo Reno5 5GSony Xperia 1 VIPractical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)The Sony's high-end chipset means significantly faster performance for demanding tasks, smooth multitasking, and better future-proofing.
AnTuTu Score325,0002,110,000The Xperia's much higher score reflects vastly superior performance. The Reno5 5G will feel noticeably slower in comparison, and might struggle with demanding games.
GPUAdreno 620Adreno 750The Sony’s GPU provides a much better graphics performance for gaming and video editing, compared to the Oppo.

Camera

FeatureOppo Reno5 5GSony Xperia 1 VIPractical Impact
Main Camera Resolution64MP48MPThe Oppo captures higher-resolution images, but it doesn't necessarily mean better quality (larger pixels on Sony).
Main Camera Aperturef/1.7f/1.9Oppo's wider aperture can capture more light, potentially improving low-light shots, but only if its pixels are big enough to gather the light.
Main Camera Sensor Size1/1.7"1/1.4"Sony's larger sensor allows it to capture more light and detail, likely resulting in better image quality, especially in low light.
Selfie Camera Resolution32MP12MPThe Oppo has higher megapixel counts on the front camera, but this doesn't always guarantee better quality.
Selfie Camera Aperturef/2.4f/2.0The Sony’s wider aperture likely gives it an edge in low-light selfies.
Additional LensesMacro lens (2MP), Wide Angle + Macro (8MP)Telephoto (12MP), Wide Angle (12.2MP)The Sony offers more versatile camera options (telephoto for zoom, wide for landscapes), whereas the Oppo has a macro for close-ups. The Sony's zoom capability will be very useful for capturing long-distance shots, whereas the Oppo's macro lenses are more of a niche feature with a relatively low quality.
Video4K@30fps (HDR, EIS) 1080p@120fps (HDR, EIS)Up to 4K@120fps (HDR, OIS, EIS)The Sony offers higher quality video recording (4K 120fps with OIS) and is better suited for high-quality video recording, along with better stabilization for smoother videos.
Video StabilizationEISOIS and EISSony's OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) provides superior stabilization, reducing blur and shakiness in videos and photos.
Additional FeaturesQuadruple cameraTriple camera, Optical zoom, RAWThe Sony has optical zoom for better image quality when zooming, whereas the Oppo is limited to digital zoom. Sony provides RAW files for more editing flexibility.

Battery

FeatureOppo Reno5 5GSony Xperia 1 VIPractical Impact
Capacity4300mAh5000mAhThe Sony's larger battery will likely provide a longer battery life.
Charging65W Fast Charging30W Fast ChargingThe Oppo charges much faster than the Sony, meaning less time waiting to charge your phone.
FeaturesReverse charging, Dual-cell batteryReverse charging, Bypass Charging, Reverse wireless chargingThe Sony has added charging features and wireless charging while the Oppo has a dual-cell battery for faster charging times, making it more versatile in terms of battery functionalities.

Software & Other

FeatureOppo Reno5 5GSony Xperia 1 VIPractical Impact
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 12)Android 14 (upgradable to 17)The Sony runs a newer version of Android, with newer features and more future updates.
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7The Sony supports the latest Wi-Fi standards, offering faster speeds, lower latency, and better performance in crowded environments.
Bluetooth5.15.4Sony has a newer Bluetooth version with more features.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, GPS (L1+L5)The Sony has a more precise GPS system for improved navigation and location accuracy.
SIMDual Nano SIMDual SIM (Nano SIM + eSIM)The Sony offers the flexibility of eSIM, whereas the Oppo supports two physical SIM cards.
Internal Storage128GB/256GB256GB/512GBThe Sony has more built-in storage options, which is useful for those with large media libraries.
RAM8GB/12GB12GBBoth have ample RAM for multitasking and performance.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone supports expandable storage, which can be an issue for users with large files.
Audio QualityDolby Atmos, Stereo SpeakersDolby Atmos, Stereo SpeakersBoth phones offer similar quality of audio using stereo speakers.
SecurityBasic Fingerprint sensorSide-mounted Fingerprint sensorThe Sony’s side-mounted fingerprint sensor is typically faster and more reliable.
SensorsAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, ProximityAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Barometer, Hall, Pedometer, ProximitySony has a wider variety of sensors and features.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Reno5 5G Advantages:

  • Lighter and more compact: More comfortable for prolonged use and better for one-handed operation.
  • Faster Charging: 65W charging is significantly faster than the Sony's 30W charging.
  • Higher Screen Brightness: Better outdoor visibility with a brightness of 750 nits.
  • Lower Price: Likely to be more budget-friendly due to its age and specs.
  • Quadruple camera with Macro: Offers a specific macro lens for very close-up shots (although quality might not be the best).
  • Dual physical SIM: Allows for two physical SIM cards, which is helpful for users who have two different carriers and prefer not to use an eSIM.

Practical Implications: The Oppo Reno5 5G is better suited for users who prioritize comfort, quick charging, and budget-friendliness and spend more time inside.

Sony Xperia 1 VI Advantages:

  • Significantly Faster Performance: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers a much more powerful experience.
  • Superior Display: 120Hz refresh rate provides smoother visuals, with better overall experience.
  • Better Camera System: Optical zoom, larger sensor, and OIS deliver a much more versatile and higher-quality photography experience, with enhanced low-light capabilities.
  • Longer Battery Life: Larger battery capacity ensures better endurance throughout the day, despite the 30W charging.
  • Newer Software and Connectivity: The newest Android version (Android 14, upgradable to 17), Wi-Fi 7, and Bluetooth 5.4 give it a technological edge, providing access to better network speeds.
  • eSIM Support: The ability to use an eSIM provides added flexibility for connectivity options.
  • Better Build Quality: Gorilla Glass Victus 2 screen provides enhanced protection against scratches and drops.
  • Additional features: Bypass Charging, Reverse wireless charging, more sensors.

Practical Implications: The Sony Xperia 1 VI is ideal for users who need top-tier performance, advanced camera features, and future-proofing.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • The Oppo has a much lower level of performance and outdated features and technology. It is suitable for those on a lower budget but has major drawbacks when comparing the two.
  • The Sony has higher levels of performance, a better camera, and better overall user experience. However, it costs more and has much slower charging speeds.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Reno5 5G Ideal User:

  • Budget-conscious users: Those looking for a functional smartphone without breaking the bank.
  • Casual users: Individuals who primarily use their phone for basic tasks, social media, and light media consumption.
  • Users who prioritize fast charging and light weight: Those who value a lightweight phone that charges quickly.
  • Users with 2 physical SIM cards: Those who need the use of 2 physical SIM cards without using an eSIM.

Use Cases:

  • Daily use for calls, messaging, and social media.
  • Casual gaming with less demanding games.
  • Web browsing and basic productivity tasks.

Sony Xperia 1 VI Ideal User:

  • Power users: Those who need high performance for multitasking, demanding apps, and heavy gaming.
  • Photography enthusiasts: Users who value a versatile and high-quality camera system for photos and videos.
  • Users who prioritize smooth performance and long battery life: Those who want a powerful phone with a display that is pleasant to use and can last all day.
  • Tech enthusiasts: Those who want the latest technology with advanced features, such as the latest Wi-Fi and Bluetooth standards.

Use Cases:

  • Mobile gaming with demanding titles.
  • Professional photography and videography.
  • Heavy multitasking and productivity.
  • Streaming high-quality content with superior visuals and audio.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Oppo Reno5 5G offers better value for budget-conscious users, delivering basic functionality for a lower price. However, it is outdated technology with slower performance.
  • The Sony Xperia 1 VI provides better value for users who need high-end performance and camera features, however, it costs significantly more.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your primary use case for the phone? (Casual use, gaming, photography, productivity)
  2. How important are performance and future-proofing for you? (Do you need the latest and fastest hardware?)
  3. What is your budget? (Are you willing to pay a premium for top-tier features?)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Budget-Conscious User: If you are on a tight budget, choose the Oppo Reno5 5G for everyday basic usage with fast charging, as it provides basic performance at a lower price point. However, note that the tech is not as up to date, so the phone won't have features that the Sony phone does, and will not perform as well.
  • Performance-Focused User: If you need top-tier performance, the Sony Xperia 1 VI is the obvious choice, as it provides much better speeds and future-proofing for a phone that will last longer. However, it comes at a higher cost.
  • Photography Enthusiast: The Sony Xperia 1 VI is much better suited for photography with its versatile camera system, optical zoom and OIS.
  • General User: The Sony Xperia 1 VI would be the better phone to buy if it fits the budget, as it provides higher quality features all around.

What I Would Choose and Why

I would choose the Sony Xperia 1 VI. While the Oppo Reno5 5G has its advantages in terms of weight, charging speeds and potentially a lower price, the Xperia 1 VI offers a significantly superior experience in almost every other aspect. As someone who values a smooth experience with the best tech available, the performance difference is the main reason I would pick this phone over the Oppo. The vastly better chipset, screen refresh rate, camera system with OIS and optical zoom, and much longer future software updates make the Xperia a more compelling option that would not need to be replaced for much longer than the Oppo.

Yes, the charging speeds are much slower compared to the Oppo. However, the larger battery capacity of the Sony means that I won't need to charge as often during the day, and would happily leave it on charge overnight. Although the price may be higher, this phone provides better value for money due to its high-performance features, which would also save me the cost of needing to upgrade in the near future.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.