Smartphone Comparison: Oppo Reno5 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy A35
1. Specifications Comparison
Design
| Feature | Oppo Reno5 5G | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Dimensions | 159.1 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm | 161.7 x 78 x 8.2 mm | A35 is larger and may feel bulkier; Reno5 5G more pocketable |
| Weight | 172g | 209g | Reno5 5G is significantly lighter, more comfortable for extended use |
| Build Material | Not specified | Not specified | Impact on durability is unknown |
Display
| Feature | Oppo Reno5 5G | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Size | 6.43" | 6.6" | A35 provides a slightly larger viewing area |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2340 | Both are sharp, with minimal visible difference |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 409 | 390 | Negligible difference in sharpness |
| Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Both offer vibrant colors and deep blacks |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | A35 has smoother scrolling & animations |
| Brightness | 750 nits | 0 nits | Reno5 5G is much better for outdoor visibility |
Performance
| Feature | Oppo Reno5 5G | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 765G (7nm) | Exynos 1380 (5nm) | A35 has a more powerful and efficient chipset |
| AnTuTu Score | 325,000 | 578,500 | A35 performs significantly better in demanding tasks |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Mali-G68 MP5 | A35 has a more powerful GPU for gaming |
Camera
| Feature | Oppo Reno5 5G | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Main Camera Resolution | 64MP, f/1.7, 1/1.7" sensor | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.96" sensor | Reno5 5G: higher resolution, larger sensor. A35: slightly better low-light performance likely due to software optimizations and ISP |
| Selfie Camera Resolution | 32MP, f/2.4 | 13MP, f/2.2 | Reno5 5G: higher resolution for detailed selfies, A35: wider aperture better in low-light conditions |
| Wide-Angle Lens | No | 8MP, f/2.2 | A35 can capture wider scenes |
| Macro Lens | 2MP, f/2.4 | 5MP, f/2.4 | A35 captures more detailed close-up shots |
| Wide Angle + Macro | 8MP, f/2.2 | No | Reno5 5G is capable of capturing detailed wide-angle photos |
| Video Recording | 4K@30fps, 1080p@120fps, HDR, EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, EIS | A35 uses superior EIS technology, both offer good recording quality and features. |
| DxOMark Score | Not available | 104 (Mobile), 107 (Photo), 110 (Video) | A35 has a benchmarked camera performance that is good, specifically for video. |
Battery
| Feature | Oppo Reno5 5G | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Capacity | 4300mAh | 5000mAh | A35 likely provides longer battery life |
| Charging | 65W Fast Charging | 25W Fast Charging | Reno5 5G charges much faster |
| Battery Type | Li-Polymer | Li-Ion | Negligible difference in daily use |
| Additional Features | Reverse charging, 2100mAh dual-cell battery | None | Reno5 5G can charge other devices, uses dual-cell technology |
Software
| Feature | Oppo Reno5 5G | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Practical Impact |
|---|
| OS | Android 11 (upgradeable to 12) | Android 14 (upgradeable to 18) | A35 offers a more up-to-date experience, longer software support |
Connectivity
| Feature | Oppo Reno5 5G | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 (ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (ax) | A35 has faster and more efficient Wi-Fi |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 | A35 offers better connectivity & power efficiency |
Storage
| Feature | Oppo Reno5 5G | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Internal Storage | 128GB/256GB | 128GB/256GB | Both offer sufficient storage |
| RAM | 8GB/12GB | 6GB/8GB | Reno5 5G potentially offers better multitasking, especially with 12GB option |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | No options for extra storage on either phone |
Audio
| Feature | Oppo Reno5 5G | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Audio Quality | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers | A35 has slightly better audio quality with Hi-Res support |
Security
| Feature | Oppo Reno5 5G | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Biometric | Basic Fingerprint Sensor | Basic Fingerprint Sensor | Similar security implementations |
Build Quality
| Feature | Oppo Reno5 5G | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3+ | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | A35 offers more durable screen against scratches and drops |
Sensors
| Feature | Oppo Reno5 5G | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope | Fingerprint, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Ultrasonic proximity virtual, Hall, Geomagnetic | Reno5 5G has a more traditional set of sensors, while A35 has more modern sensors |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Oppo Reno5 5G Advantages
- Lighter and More Compact: More pocketable and comfortable for extended use.
- Faster Charging: 65W charging significantly reduces downtime.
- Higher Brightness Display: Better outdoor visibility in direct sunlight.
- Higher Resolution Front Camera: Offers more detailed selfies.
- Potentially More RAM: 12GB RAM option for demanding multitasking.
- Reverse Charging: Can charge other devices.
Samsung Galaxy A35 Advantages
- More Powerful Chipset: Offers better performance for gaming and demanding tasks.
- Larger Battery: Likely provides longer battery life.
- Smoother Display: 120Hz refresh rate for fluid animations.
- Better Software: More up-to-date Android version and longer support.
- Wide Angle Lens: Increased photographic versatility.
- More Modern Sensors: Including Hall and Geomagnetic sensors
- Superior Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus offers better drop resistance
- Better Audio: Offers Hi-Res Audio.
- Better Video Stabilization: Better EIS technology
Trade-offs
- Reno5 5G: Faster charging and brighter display, but weaker performance and older software.
- A35: Better performance, battery, and software, but is bulkier, slower charging, and a less bright display.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Oppo Reno5 5G Ideal User
Samsung Galaxy A35 Ideal User
Price-to-Value Ratio
- The Samsung A35 offers a more modern package and is therefore higher in value
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers
- Performance vs. Charging Speed: Do you prioritize the best performance and long battery, or faster charging and brighter display?
- Display Needs: Is the smoother display of the A35 worth it, or is the brighter display of the Reno5 5G more crucial?
- Software Longevity: Do you need the latest software and support?
Scenario-Based Recommendations
Scenario 1 (Budget-conscious, Everyday use): The Oppo Reno5 5G is a viable option, offering a bright display, reverse charging, and fast charging, though it does fall behind in performance.
Scenario 2 (Performance-focused): The Samsung Galaxy A35 is the better choice with its superior performance, longer battery life, and future-proof software, especially if you play games or do intensive tasks.
Scenario 3 (Outdoor Use): The Oppo Reno5 5G with its superior brightness wins out.
My Choice
If I had to choose between these two phones, I would pick the Samsung Galaxy A35. While the Oppo Reno5 5G has some advantages, like faster charging and a slightly brighter display, the A35's superior processing power, larger battery, newer software, and better display quality provide a more well-rounded experience for my use cases. I value the smoother display and the enhanced capabilities of the A35. The camera features of the A35 also appeal to me more, due to the wide-angle lens and it's benchmarked video capabilities. Despite the slower charging, I believe the better overall performance, and more future proof software of the Samsung Galaxy A35 make it the superior device.
