Oppo Reno5 5G vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 7, 2021 June 5, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 92.26 cm³ 88.47 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.74 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 172 g 184.5 g
Height 159.1 mm 170.8 mm
Width 73.4 mm 74 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 7 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Starry Black
  • Galactic Silver
  • Azure Blue
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz

Display

Screen Size 6.43 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.5 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 409 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness 430 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 750 nits 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.00 mAh/in² 79.82 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.61 mAh/cm³ 42.95 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4300 mAh 3800 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 620 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 12 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Feature CategoryFeatureOppo Reno5 5GMotorola Razr 40 UltraPractical Impact
DesignForm FactorStandardFoldableThe Razr 40 Ultra offers a unique, compact form factor when folded, and a larger display when unfolded. The Reno5 5G is a traditional, non-folding design.
Dimensions159.1 × 73.4 × 7.9 mm170.8 × 74 × 7 mmRazr is taller but thinner; Reno5 is slightly more compact overall when folded.
Weight172g184.5gReno5 is lighter, which may be more comfortable for extended use.
DisplaySize6.43"6.9"Razr has a larger screen for more immersive viewing.
Resolution1080x24001080x2640The Razr has a slightly sharper display, though the difference is subtle.
Pixel Density409 PPI413 PPIBoth offer similar sharpness, virtually indistinguishable to the naked eye.
TechnologyAMOLEDReno5 has superior color vibrancy and deeper blacks; Razr display technology is unknown from provided data.
Refresh Rate90Hz165HzRazr provides significantly smoother scrolling and animation, enhancing the user experience.
Brightness750 nits1400 nitsRazr offers much better visibility in bright sunlight, while the Reno5 might struggle.
PerformanceChipsetSnapdragon 765GSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1The Razr offers substantially better performance, leading to smoother multitasking and faster app loading.
AnTuTu Score325,0001,238,000The Razr is significantly faster and more responsive for demanding tasks and games.
GPUAdreno 620Adreno 730The Razr has a more powerful GPU, offering better gaming and graphics performance.
BatteryCapacity4300mAh3800mAhThe Reno5 is likely to offer longer battery life, especially under heavy use.
Charging65W Fast Charging30W Fast ChargingThe Reno5 can be charged much faster, minimizing downtime.
FeaturesDual-cell battery, Reverse ChargingWireless charging, Reverse ChargingThe Reno5 has a dual-cell battery, while the Razr has wireless charging, offering varied user needs
CameraMain Camera Resolution64MP12MPReno5 has a higher resolution sensor, which can offer more detail in good lighting; however, sensor size and image processing play a large role
Main Camera Aperturef/1.7f/1.5Razr's wider aperture is better in low light and offers shallower depth of field
Selfie Camera Aperturef/2.4f/2.45Reno5 has slightly wider selfie camera aperture, allowing slightly more light
Macro Lens2MPNoneReno5 has a dedicated macro lens, useful for close-up shots
Wide Angle8MP13MPRazr offers a higher resolution for ultrawide shots
Video StabilizationEISEIS + OISRazr is likely to offer better stabilization and smoother video recording thanks to OIS
SoftwareOSAndroid 11Android 13Razr has a newer OS, likely to get longer support
ConnectivityWiFi802.11acWi-Fi 6ERazr has faster WiFi speeds and a more reliable connection with WiFi 6E
Bluetooth5.15.3Razr has a more modern and power-efficient Bluetooth connection
SIMDual Nano SIMDual Nano SIM / eSIMRazr supports eSIM, giving more flexibility with carrier choices.
StorageInternal128/256GB256/512GBThe Razr has a higher maximum storage capacity, catering to users who need more space for files and apps.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone offers expandable storage, which might limit space if large amounts of data are needed
AudioQualityStereo Speakers, Dolby AtmosStereo Speakers, Dolby Atmos, 3 MicrophonesRazr has a slight advantage for calls, recording, and spatial audio thanks to multiple microphones.
SecurityFingerprint SensorBasicSide-mountedRazr has a more convenient fingerprint sensor placement
BuildScreen ProtectionGorilla Glass 3+Gorilla Glass VictusRazr has better protection from scratches and impacts on the screen.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Reno5 5G Advantages:

  • Lighter Weight: More comfortable for extended use.
  • Larger Battery: Better battery life for longer use on a single charge.
  • Faster Charging: Quickly replenish battery power with 65W fast charging.
  • Dedicated Macro Lens: Offers an additional camera for creative close-up photography.
  • Lower Price: Potentially more affordable, which could be important for budget-conscious users.

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Unique and compact, offering portability and novelty.
  • Larger and Smoother Display: More immersive with a higher refresh rate, making content feel smoother and more responsive.
  • Significantly Higher Performance: A much faster processor for smoother multitasking, gaming, and overall use.
  • Better Screen Protection: The newer Gorilla Glass Victus on the Razr provides higher protection
  • Higher Brightness: Better screen visibility in bright sunlight.
  • Newer OS: Latest Android version with more potential for future updates.
  • Better WiFi and Bluetooth: Faster and more reliable wireless connections.
  • eSIM Support: More flexibility with carrier choices.
  • Wireless Charging: Convenient way to charge the device without cables.
  • Better Video Stabilization: OIS offers smoother video recording compared to EIS.
  • Better Audio Recording: Multiple microphones will offer superior audio capture, especially for video and voice calls.

Practical Implications & Trade-offs:

  • Foldable vs. Standard: The Razr's foldable form offers convenience and novelty but may come with durability trade-offs. The Reno5 is a classic design with a more straightforward user experience.
  • Performance vs. Battery: The Razr prioritizes speed and responsiveness, while the Reno5 prioritizes battery life.
  • Camera: The Reno5 has higher resolution in the main sensor, but the Razr seems to have a better image processing due to the sensor and OIS, and ultrawide lens.
  • Price: The Razr is expected to be more expensive, reflecting its advanced features and design.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Ideal User for Oppo Reno5 5G:

  • Budget-Conscious User: Those who want a reliable phone with good battery life at a more affordable price.
  • Everyday User: Users who need a practical phone for day-to-day tasks, social media, and basic photography.
  • Users who value battery life: People who prioritize long usage time over high-end performance.
  • Users that prefer macro photography: Those that want a good macro lens for close up shots

Use Cases:

  • Long commutes: Watching videos and listening to music without needing to recharge frequently.
  • Casual Gaming: Playing less demanding games without performance issues.
  • Everyday Photography: Capturing good photos in normal lighting conditions.

Ideal User for Motorola Razr 40 Ultra:

  • Tech Enthusiast: Those who want the latest and most innovative technology, including a foldable design.
  • Power User: Those who need a high-performance device for multitasking, demanding apps, and gaming.
  • Content Creators: Users who require a high-quality display, good video recording, and strong connectivity.
  • Users who need an easy to read screen in bright light: The Razr excels in sunny conditions, making it ideal for outdoor use.

Use Cases:

  • Mobile Gaming: Playing demanding games smoothly with high frame rates and responsiveness.
  • Professional Use: Multitasking between apps, editing documents, and using video conferencing.
  • High-Quality Media Consumption: Enjoying movies, videos, and browsing with a vibrant and smooth display.
  • Content Creation: Users that prioritize stabilization, high quality video capture, and multiple microphones for improved audio recording.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • Oppo Reno5 5G: Offers good value for those seeking a reliable, budget-friendly smartphone with decent performance and good battery life.
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Is more expensive but justifies the price with cutting-edge features, better performance, and a more premium user experience.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Reno5 is more budget-friendly, while the Razr is a premium-priced device.
  2. Do you value portability and innovation, or simplicity and reliability? The Razr offers a foldable form with the newest features, while the Reno5 is a standard design for everyday use.
  3. How important is performance vs battery life? The Razr prioritizes high performance, while the Reno5 prioritizes battery longevity.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Casual User on a Budget - If you primarily use your phone for social media, browsing, and basic tasks, the Oppo Reno5 5G will be the more practical and cost-effective choice.
  • Scenario 2: Gaming and High Performance - If you're a heavy gamer, require fast processing power, or need a high-end display for media consumption, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is the better option despite the higher price.
  • Scenario 3: Cutting-Edge Tech & Mobility - If you want a unique and innovative phone with a foldable display and don't mind paying a premium for it, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is ideal.
  • Scenario 4: Extended Use without Charging: If you need a phone with excellent battery life and the ability to quick charge, the Oppo Reno5 5G is the better choice

Personal Choice

Personally, I would choose the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. While the price is higher, the improvements in performance, screen quality, and overall user experience are too significant to ignore. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, the 165Hz display, and the better build quality and screen protection make it a far more future-proof and satisfying device. Additionally, I'm intrigued by the foldable form factor and the novelty it brings, which would make this smartphone a more enjoyable device to own. While the Reno5 5G has its advantages, such as longer battery life and a lower price, the benefits offered by the Razr 40 Ultra align better with my needs and expectations for a high-end smartphone.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.