Oppo Reno11 vs Samsung Galaxy A35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 25, 2024 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 95.32 cm³ 103.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.68 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 182 g 209 g
Height 162.4 mm 161.7 mm
Width 74.3 mm 78 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Wave Green
  • Rock Grey
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2412 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.5 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 950 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.45 mAh/cm³ 48.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

Oppo Reno11 vs. Samsung Galaxy A35: A Holistic Comparative Analysis

As a technology researcher, my analysis goes beyond simple spec comparisons to provide a holistic understanding of the Oppo Reno11 and Samsung Galaxy A35 within the broader mobile technology landscape.

1. Comprehensive Specification Mapping

FeatureOppo Reno11Samsung Galaxy A35Technological ContextInnovation PotentialEcosystem IntegrationPerformance MetricsUser Experience Indicators
Display6.7" AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 950 nits peak6.6" Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM)High refresh rate displays are becoming standard, pushing for smoother user experiences. HDR enhances visual quality.MediumHighHighExcellent
Resolution1080 x 2412 (394 PPI)1080 x 2340 (390 PPI)Higher PPI contributes to sharper images.LowMediumSimilarSimilar
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm)Exynos 1380 (5nm)5nm chipsets offer better power efficiency and performance compared to 6nm.MediumHighSamsung Potentially HigherSimilar
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz A78 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz A78 & 4x2.0 GHz A55)CPU core configuration influences multitasking and processing power.MediumMediumSamsung Potentially HigherSimilar
GPUMali-G68 MC4Mali-G68 MP5GPU impacts gaming and graphics-intensive tasks. MP5 configuration generally offers better performance.MediumMediumSamsung Potentially HigherSimilar
RAM/Storage256GB/12GB128/256GB/8GBLarger RAM enables smoother multitasking. Storage options cater to varied user needs.MediumMediumOppo HigherDepends on User
Battery5000 mAh5000 mAhBattery capacity is crucial for daily usage.LowMediumSimilarSimilar
OSAndroid 14Android 14 (up to 18)Consistent OS ensures access to latest features and security updates. Samsung's longer update promise is a significant advantage.LowHighSimilarSamsung Potentially Higher
Dimensions (HxWxD)162.4 x 74.3 x 7.9 mm161.7 x 78 x 8.2 mmDimensions influence ergonomics and portability.LowMediumSimilarSimilar
Weight182g209gLighter devices enhance portability.LowMediumOppo HigherOppo Higher
Video CapabilitiesUp to 4K@30fps, 720p@960fpsUp to 4K@30fpsVaried video recording capabilities cater to content creation needs.MediumMediumOppo HigherOppo Higher

2. Strategic Technological Insights

Both devices represent the mid-range segment, focusing on delivering a balance of performance and affordability. The Reno11 emphasizes display brightness and slightly better video capabilities, while the Galaxy A35 potentially boasts a more powerful processor and GPU, along with a commitment to longer OS updates.

3. User Ecosystem Alignment

Both devices integrate well within the Android ecosystem. However, Samsung's longer OS update commitment and potential ecosystem synergies with other Samsung devices might provide a stronger long-term value proposition.

4. Future-Oriented Decision Framework

While specifications provide a snapshot of current capabilities, future-proofing requires considering factors like OS update longevity, brand reputation for software support, and potential for integration with emerging technologies.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A35

While the Oppo Reno11 boasts a brighter display and superior slow-motion video capture, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A35. The deciding factors are the potentially more powerful Exynos 1380 processor built on a more advanced 5nm process, promising better performance and efficiency, along with Samsung's commitment to longer OS updates, ensuring security and access to new features for a longer period. The slightly heavier weight is a trade-off I'm willing to make for these longer-term benefits. In a rapidly evolving technological landscape, software support and processing power are key determinants of a device's long-term value proposition. While the differences are subtle, the A35's advantages in these crucial areas align better with my priorities for a future-proof device.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.