Oppo Reno11 vs Realme C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C65
Realme C65
Realme

General

Launch Date January 25, 2024 April 1, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 95.32 cm³ 95.2 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.68 "/g 3.61 "/g
Weight 182 g 185 g
Height 162.4 mm 164.6 mm
Width 74.3 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Wave Green
  • Rock Grey
  • Purple Nebula
  • Black Milky Way

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2412 720 x 1604
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.5 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 264 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness 800 nits 625 nits
Peak Brightness 950 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.45 mAh/cm³ 52.52 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Oppo Reno11 and Realme C65, moving beyond the raw numbers to uncover the stories these devices tell about the user experience.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureOppo Reno11Realme C65User Experience Impact
Display6.7" AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 950 nits peak6.67" IPS LCD, 90Hz, 625 nits HBMReno11 offers a significantly richer, smoother, and brighter visual experience.
Resolution1080 x 2412 (394 ppi)720 x 1604 (264 ppi)Reno11's sharper display provides greater clarity for text, images, and videos.
PerformanceDimensity 7050 (6nm), Mali-G68 MC4Helio G85 (12nm), Mali-G52 MC2Reno11 boasts superior processing power and graphics capabilities for smoother multitasking and gaming.
Fingerprint SensorUnder-displaySide-mountedBoth offer convenient unlocking, personal preference dictates placement.
Build182g, 7.9mm thin185g, 7.6mm thinNegligible difference in weight and thickness; both feel relatively slim.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Imagine a photography enthusiast, Sarah. With the Reno11's superior AMOLED display and vibrant colors, editing photos becomes an immersive experience. The smooth 120Hz refresh rate makes scrolling through her gallery a joy. Conversely, David, a casual gamer, might find the Realme C65 adequate for light gaming, although the Reno11's superior processor would offer a noticeable advantage in demanding games.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

For users with visual impairments, the Reno11's brighter display and higher resolution make it easier to read text and discern details. However, the side-mounted fingerprint sensor on the Realme C65 might be more tactile and easier to locate for some users. Both phones cater to a broad audience with their NFC capabilities for contactless payments.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The Oppo Reno11 prioritizes a premium visual experience and robust performance. Its sleek design and under-display fingerprint sensor contribute to a modern aesthetic. The Realme C65, on the other hand, focuses on providing essential features at a potentially more accessible price point. It offers a large display and long battery life but compromises on display quality and processing power.

My Choice: Oppo Reno11

As Sophia Rodriguez, I prioritize user experience and design. The Reno11's stunning AMOLED display, powerful processor, and sleek design resonate strongly with my emphasis on creating engaging and enjoyable user interactions. The superior display alone dramatically enhances everyday tasks like browsing photos, watching videos, and even reading text. While the Realme C65 offers a solid foundation, the Reno11 elevates the mobile experience with its thoughtful design choices and superior technology, making it the clear winner for me. The investment in the enhanced display and performance would significantly impact daily use, making it a worthwhile choice.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.