Oppo Reno11 vs Motorola Moto G85 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 25, 2024 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 95.32 cm³ 89.95 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.68 "/g 3.9 "/g
Weight 182 g 171 g
Height 162.4 mm 161.9 mm
Width 74.3 mm 73.1 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Wave Green
  • Rock Grey
  • Cobalt Blue
  • Olive Green
  • Urban Grey
  • Magenta

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2412 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.5 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 950 nits 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.45 mAh/cm³ 55.59 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Oppo Reno11 vs. Motorola Moto G85: A Deep Dive for the Discerning Smartphone User

The mid-range smartphone arena is heating up, with contenders like the Oppo Reno11 and Motorola Moto G85 vying for your attention. Both boast impressive specs on paper, but how do they translate to real-world performance? Let's dissect these devices, uncovering the nuances that separate them and empowering you to choose the perfect fit.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureOppo Reno11Motorola Moto G85Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions162.4 x 74.3 x 7.9 mm161.9 x 73.1 x 7.6 mmMoto G85 slightly smaller, potentially more pocketable
Weight182g171gMoto G85 noticeably lighter for extended use
Display
Display TypeAMOLED, 1B colors, 120HzP-OLED, 1B colors, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and vibrant colors; AMOLED generally has deeper blacks and better power efficiency
Peak Brightness950 nits1600 nitsMoto G85 significantly brighter for outdoor visibility
Resolution1080 x 24121080 x 2400Virtually identical sharpness
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6nm)Both offer similar mid-range performance, but benchmarks would be needed for precise comparison
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Reno11 has a slight edge in CPU clock speed, potentially translating to faster app loading and multitasking
GPUMali-G68 MC4Adreno 619Gaming performance likely comparable, but specific game tests are needed
RAM12GB12GBAmple memory for smooth multitasking on both devices
Storage256GB256GBPlenty of storage for apps, photos, and videos
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity suggests comparable endurance
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30fps, 1080p up to 480fps1080p@30/60fpsReno11 significantly more versatile for video recording, with higher resolution and slow-motion options

2. Key Insights

  • Display: While both phones feature 120Hz refresh rates for buttery smooth scrolling, the Moto G85's higher peak brightness gives it a clear advantage in outdoor readability. However, the Reno11's AMOLED display likely offers deeper blacks and better power efficiency.

  • Performance: On paper, the Reno11's slightly faster CPU clock speed might provide a marginal performance boost, but real-world differences could be negligible. The choice between the Dimensity 7050 and Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 will likely come down to optimized software and individual app performance.

  • Video Recording: The Reno11 stands out with its superior video capabilities, offering 4K recording and various slow-motion options, making it ideal for content creators and casual videographers. The Moto G85's video features are more basic.

  • Weight and Dimensions: The Moto G85 is lighter and slightly smaller, contributing to a more comfortable one-handed experience.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Oppo Reno11: Best suited for users who prioritize a vibrant display, versatile video recording capabilities, and potentially slightly faster processing power.

  • Motorola Moto G85: Ideal for users who value outdoor visibility, a lighter and more compact design, and prioritize battery life in bright conditions (due to the power efficiency benefits of a brighter peak luminance on OLED displays).

4. Buying Decision Framework

Questions to Ask Yourself:

  1. Do you frequently use your phone outdoors in bright sunlight? If yes, the Moto G85's superior brightness is crucial.
  2. How important is video recording quality to you? The Reno11 offers a clear advantage for video enthusiasts.
  3. Do you prioritize a lighter, more compact phone? The Moto G85 wins in this category.

My Choice: The Oppo Reno11

While the Moto G85 boasts a brighter display and lighter build, I would choose the Oppo Reno11. The deciding factor for me is the significantly more versatile video recording capability. As someone who often captures quick videos, the ability to shoot in 4K and utilize slow-motion features is invaluable. The slightly faster processor and potentially better power efficiency of the AMOLED display are also appealing. While the Moto G85's brighter screen is a strong point, I can usually find shade or adjust my viewing angle when outdoors. The trade-off for superior video features and a potentially smoother user experience makes the Reno11 the winner for my personal needs.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.