Oppo Reno11 vs Motorola Moto G55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 25, 2024 September 6, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 95.32 cm³ 96.6 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.68 "/g 3.63 "/g
Weight 182 g 179 g
Height 162.4 mm 161.6 mm
Width 74.3 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Wave Green
  • Rock Grey
  • Forest Grey
  • Smoky Green
  • Twilight Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.49 "
Resolution 1080 x 2412 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.5 % 85.3 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 950 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 118.71 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.45 mAh/cm³ 51.76 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 IMG BXM-8-256

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Reno11Motorola Moto G55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.4 x 74.3 x 7.9161.6 x 73.8 x 8.1Virtually identical in size and feel. The Moto G55 is marginally thicker.
Weight (g)182179Negligible weight difference; both feel light in hand.
Fingerprint SensorUnder-displaySide-mountedPreference-based; under-display feels more modern, side-mounted can be faster and more reliable.
Display
Display TypeAMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+IPS LCD, 120HzReno11's AMOLED offers significantly better contrast, deeper blacks, and richer colors. HDR10+ support provides a superior viewing experience for compatible content.
Display Size (inches)6.76.49Negligible size difference in real-world usage.
Resolution1080 x 24121080 x 2400Nearly identical sharpness; both are crisp and clear.
Peak Brightness (nits)950Not specifiedReno11 offers superior brightness, improving outdoor visibility. Missing Moto G55 brightness data limits comparison.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm)Minor performance differences expected; Reno11 likely has a slight edge in GPU performance due to the Mali-G68 MC4. The 7025 may have slightly better CPU performance.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Very similar CPU performance; both are capable for everyday tasks.
RAM12GB8GBReno11's extra RAM allows for better multitasking and app switching.
Storage256GB256GBBoth offer ample storage space.
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30fps (EIS), 1080p at various frame rates and slow-mo up to 960fps1080p@30/60fpsReno11 offers superior video recording capabilities including 4K resolution and various slow-motion options. Missing detailed Moto G55 camera specs limit full comparison.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity; real-world battery life depends on usage and optimization.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Reno11 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED with HDR10+ offers a much better visual experience.
  • More RAM: 12GB ensures smoother multitasking.
  • Advanced Video Recording: 4K resolution and various slow-motion options.
  • Higher Peak Brightness: Better outdoor visibility.

Motorola Moto G55 Advantages:

  • Potentially Slightly Faster CPU: While marginal, the slightly higher clock speed on the performance cores could provide a minor advantage in some tasks.
  • Potentially Lower Price: While not specified, Motorola G series phones often target a more budget-conscious market.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Reno11: Users who prioritize display quality, multimedia consumption (video watching), and smooth multitasking. Gamers might also prefer the Reno11 due to the potentially better GPU.

Motorola Moto G55: Users who prioritize value and essential features. Users who are less demanding of display quality and primarily use their phone for basic communication, web browsing, and social media.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is display quality?
  2. What is your budget?
  3. What are your primary use cases (e.g., gaming, video streaming, photography)?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget: Moto G55, if price is significantly lower.
  • Multimedia Enthusiast: Oppo Reno11, for its superior display and video capabilities.
  • Power User: Oppo Reno11, for its extra RAM and better overall performance.

My Choice: Oppo Reno11

The Oppo Reno11's superior AMOLED display, 4K video recording, and extra RAM make it the more compelling device for me. The improved visual experience and smoother multitasking outweigh the potential minor performance advantage of the Moto G55 and the uncertainty surrounding its price. While the missing brightness specification for the Moto G55 limits a complete comparison, the available data points strongly suggest the Reno11 offers a better overall package for a broader range of users. I value a great display and smooth performance, and the Reno11 delivers in these crucial areas. Even if the Moto G55 is cheaper, the difference in quality would likely be worth the price difference for me.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.