Oppo Reno10 vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date July 15, 2023 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 96.4 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.62 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 185 g 222 g
Height 162.4 mm 162.3 mm
Width 74.2 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 8 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Ice Blue
  • Silvery Grey
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2412 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.6 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 950 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.87 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Reno10Samsung Galaxy M35Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.4 x 74.2 x 8162.3 x 78.6 x 9.1M35 slightly taller, wider, and thicker. Reno10 noticeably thinner. Impacts portability and in-hand feel.
Weight (g)185222Reno10 significantly lighter. Reduces hand fatigue during prolonged use.
Fingerprint SensorUnder-displaySide-mountedPreference-dependent. Under-display feels more modern, side-mounted can be faster to unlock.
Display
Display TypeAMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+Super AMOLED, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and vibrant colors. Reno10 supports HDR10+ for enhanced video content. Missing color depth info for M35.
Size (inches)6.76.6Negligible size difference.
Resolution1080 x 24121080 x 2340Similar sharpness.
Peak Brightness (nits)950Not specifiedReno10's higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight. Missing peak brightness for M35 limits comparison.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)Exynos 1380 (5 nm)Exynos 1380 generally considered more powerful due to smaller process node. Expect smoother multitasking and potentially better gaming on the M35.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)M35 has more powerful cores, likely leading to better performance in demanding tasks.
GPUMali-G68 MC4Mali-G68 MP5M35's GPU likely offers improved graphics performance for gaming.
RAM8GB8GBEqual RAM capacity should provide similar multitasking capabilities.
Storage256GB256GBEqual storage capacity.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50006000M35 boasts significantly larger battery capacity, potentially translating to longer usage time.
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30fps, 1080p up to 480fps4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 720p@480fpsReno10 offers more versatile slow-motion recording options with 1080p@120/480fps. Missing detailed camera specs limit comprehensive comparison.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Reno10 Advantages:

  • Lighter and slimmer design: More comfortable for one-handed use and pocket portability.
  • Brighter display: Improved outdoor visibility.
  • More versatile slow-motion video: Captures smoother slow-motion footage in 1080p.

Samsung Galaxy M35 Advantages:

  • More powerful processor and GPU: Smoother performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Larger battery capacity: Potentially significantly longer battery life.
  • Newer Android version out of the box: Access to latest features and potentially longer software support.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Reno10: Users prioritizing a lightweight, slim design, bright display, and good slow-motion video recording. Suitable for casual photography, social media, and everyday tasks.

Samsung Galaxy M35: Users prioritizing performance, long battery life, and the latest software. Suitable for mobile gaming, heavy multitasking, and power users needing extended usage without charging.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. How important is portability and in-hand feel? Reno10 wins if slimness and lightness are paramount.
  2. What is your primary usage? M35 for demanding tasks and gaming; Reno10 for general use and video recording.
  3. How important is battery life? M35 likely offers longer battery life.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M35

While the Oppo Reno10 offers a compellingly slim and light design, the Samsung Galaxy M35's superior performance, longer battery life, and newer Android version make it the better choice for me. The more powerful chipset and GPU would provide a smoother experience for my daily use, which involves multitasking and occasional gaming. The significantly larger battery capacity ensures I can go a full day without worrying about charging. The newer OS also suggests longer-term software updates and support. While the Reno10's lighter weight is attractive, the performance and battery benefits of the M35 outweigh this advantage for my personal needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.