Oppo Find X3 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 April 26, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 100.48 cm³ 95.71 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.47 "/g 3.65 "/g
Weight 193 g 176 g
Height 163.6 mm 159.9 mm
Width 74 mm 73.9 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • White
  • Gloss Black
  • Cosmic Mocha
  • Mars Edition
  • Photographer Edition
  • Ice Blue
  • Onyx Black
  • Pearl Green

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.43 "
Resolution 1440 x 3216 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.2 % 84.5 %
Pixel Density 525 PPI 409 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 700 nits
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 100.25 mAh/in² 120.93 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.78 mAh/cm³ 52.24 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 660 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 12SPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.6 × 74 × 8.3 mm159.9 × 73.9 × 8.1 mmOppo is taller and thicker; Xiaomi is slightly more compact and lighter, easier for one-hand use.
Weight193g176gXiaomi is significantly lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Size6.7"6.43"Oppo offers a more immersive viewing experience, better for media consumption.
Resolution1440x32161080x2400Oppo's display is noticeably sharper, with finer details and text clarity.
Pixel Density525 ppi409 ppiOppo's display appears crisper and clearer, beneficial for reading and detailed viewing.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks; similar viewing quality in color reproduction.
Refresh Rate120Hz90HzOppo's screen feels smoother during scrolling and animations; better for gaming and fast-paced content.
Brightness1300 nits1000 nitsOppo is significantly brighter, enhancing outdoor visibility under direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 888 (5 nm)Helio G96 (12 nm)Oppo offers far superior performance, handling demanding apps and games with ease.
AnTuTu Score876,500412,400Oppo is significantly faster, with smoother multitasking and quicker app launches.
GPUAdreno 660Mali-G57 MC2Oppo provides better graphics performance, essential for graphic-intensive applications and mobile games.
Battery
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhXiaomi's battery offers potentially longer usage between charges.
Charging65W Fast Charging33W Fast ChargingOppo's charges the battery much faster, reducing downtime.
Wireless Charging30W Wireless ChargingNoOppo offers added convenience of wireless charging
Camera
Main Camera50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56", 1.0µm108MP, f/1.8, 1/1.52", 0.7µmXiaomi has higher resolution, but Oppo has bigger pixel size and better sensor, which may result in better low light performance.
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74", 0.8µm16MP, f/2.4Oppo offers higher resolution for selfies, resulting in more detailed images. Sensor size and model for Xiaomi is missing.
Telephoto Lens13MP, f/2.4, 1/3.4", 1.0µmNoOppo offers optical zoom capabilities, allowing closer shots without losing image quality.
Wide Angle Lens50MP, f/2.2, 1/1.56", 1.0µm8MP, f/2.2Oppo offers higher resolution for wide angle shots, allowing for more detail in photos.
Macro LensNo2MP, f/2.4Xiaomi offers macro photography capabilities for close-up shots. Sensor model for Xiaomi is missing.
VideoUp to 4K@60fps1080p@30fpsOppo allows higher quality video recording, while Xiaomi is more basic.
DxOMark128 (Mobile)N/AOppo's camera performance is rated, while Xiaomi has no score.
OISYesNoOppo has Optical Image Stabilization, which helps with sharper photos and smoother video.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 14)Android 13Xiaomi ships with a newer Android version, but Oppo has a potential upgrade to newer version; software support is different.
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 5Oppo has faster Wi-Fi, for improved network speeds.
Storage
Internal256/512GB64/128/256GBOppo offers higher storage options, useful for storing a lot of data.
RAM12/16 GB6/8 GBOppo enables smoother multitasking with more RAM.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone allows for additional storage.
Audio
Audio QualityDolby AtmosHi-Res AudioDifferent audio enhancement technologies but both have stereo speakers; user preference might be more relevant here.
Security
Fingerprint Sensorbasic fingerprint sensorside-mounted fingerprint sensorXiaomi offers quicker and more reliable unlocking experience.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionGorilla Glass 5Gorilla Glass 3Oppo's screen is more scratch-resistant.
Sensors
SensorsExtensiveCommon setOppo includes more sensors which may be used for more features or better accuracy.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 888 chipset offers significantly faster processing, better for gaming, heavy apps, and multitasking.
  • High-Quality Display: The higher resolution, pixel density, refresh rate, and brightness result in a visibly sharper, smoother, and more vibrant display.
  • Advanced Camera System: The telephoto lens, higher-resolution wide-angle lens, and overall higher video quality makes it more versatile for photography. Inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is key for better photo and video quality.
  • Faster Charging and Wireless: Offers significantly faster wired charging and the convenience of wireless charging.
  • Superior Screen Protection: Uses newer Gorilla Glass version, offering better scratch resistance.
  • More Sensors: Wider array of sensors compared to the Xiaomi.
  • More RAM: With up to 16 GB RAM, the Oppo can handle more multitasking better than the Xiaomi.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Advantages:

  • Lower Price: This is generally a more budget-friendly option.
  • Larger Battery: The slightly larger battery capacity might offer longer battery life.
  • Macro Camera: Offers a dedicated macro lens for close-up photography.
  • Newer OS: Ships with Android 13.
  • Lighter: More comfortable for extended use due to its lighter weight.
  • Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor: Offers a more modern fingerprint sensor.

Trade-offs:

  • Oppo: Sacrifices some battery capacity for better performance, display, and camera. The price is likely higher.
  • Xiaomi: Prioritizes a lower price and longer battery life but compromises on performance, display quality, and camera capabilities.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Pro Ideal Users:

  • Power Users: Individuals who need top-tier performance for gaming, video editing, and running multiple applications simultaneously.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Those who want a versatile camera system with good image quality, telephoto zoom, and advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS).
  • Media Consumers: Users who frequently watch videos or browse detailed content and appreciate a high-quality, vibrant display.
  • Tech Enthusiasts: People who prefer the latest tech and appreciate faster charging and wireless charging.

Use Cases:

  • Gaming: High refresh rate, powerful GPU and chipset, make for a superior gaming experience.
  • Professional Photography/Videography: High-resolution cameras with OIS, 4K recording, and editing capabilities.
  • Outdoor Usage: Bright display and wireless charging for easier use in different situations.
  • Heavy Multitasking: Excellent multitasking capabilities with large RAM and powerful chipset.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Ideal Users:

  • Budget-Conscious Buyers: Individuals looking for a reliable phone that doesn't break the bank.
  • Everyday Users: Those who need a phone for general tasks, social media, and casual use.
  • Users Who Prioritize Battery Life: Individuals who prefer a long-lasting battery and don't mind slightly slower charging.
  • Macro photographers: Users who enjoy close up shots.

Use Cases:

  • General Browsing: Suitable for web browsing, social media, and general use.
  • Casual Photography: Decent photography capabilities for everyday snaps.
  • Extended Battery Life: Users who require a phone that will last the entire day.
  • Basic Functionality: Ideal for a second phone or a simple communication device.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • Oppo: Offers a premium experience with top-of-the-line performance and features but comes at a higher price.
  • Xiaomi: Offers good value for its price, providing reliable performance for everyday tasks at a more affordable cost.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Oppo is likely more expensive than the Xiaomi.
  2. How important is performance and gaming? The Oppo excels in these areas, while the Xiaomi is more basic.
  3. What are your camera needs? Oppo has better camera hardware while the Xiaomi offers a macro camera for close-up photos.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: High Performance and Media Consumption: If your priority is smooth performance, gaming, high-quality media viewing, and you have the budget, choose the Oppo Find X3 Pro.
  • Scenario 2: Budget and Battery Life: If you are looking for a cost-effective option with good battery life for everyday use, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S is a suitable choice.
  • Scenario 3: Balanced Use and Price Sensitivity: If you want a balance between performance and price, and not very demanding, go for the Xiaomi but with the understanding that the display and camera are not high end.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would opt for the Oppo Find X3 Pro. Here’s why:

While the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S is a perfectly capable phone, especially for budget-conscious users, the Oppo Find X3 Pro provides a significantly better experience in almost every key area. My priorities lean towards a device that can handle demanding tasks and offer superior media consumption and photography capabilities.

Here are my reasons:

  • Performance: The Snapdragon 888 chipset in the Oppo is a substantial upgrade, offering smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a better experience when running demanding apps or gaming. I frequently use my phone for tasks that benefit from this extra horsepower.
  • Display Quality: The difference in display quality is huge. The higher resolution, pixel density, and refresh rate of the Oppo’s display will make a noticeable difference in daily usage and make consuming media much more enjoyable.
  • Camera Versatility: I appreciate a versatile camera system. The inclusion of a telephoto lens, a better wide-angle lens, and OIS on the Oppo makes it a more compelling choice for photography and videography. While the Xiaomi offers a macro lens, the overall capabilities of the Oppo camera are more attractive for my needs.
  • Charging Speed and Wireless Charging: Fast charging, and especially wireless charging, adds significant convenience, allowing for faster top-ups and less downtime, which aligns with my mobile usage habits.
  • Longer Software Support: With an upgradable OS, the Oppo might have a longer useful life span compared to the Xiaomi.

Although the Xiaomi offers a larger battery and a lighter build, these advantages don't outweigh the performance, display, and camera benefits of the Oppo for me. I'm willing to pay the price premium for a smoother, more versatile experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.