1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Oppo Find X3 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Launch Date | 2021-03-19 | 2022-04-28 | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT is a year newer, potentially offering more recent software and tech. |
| Dimensions | 163.6 × 74 × 8.3 mm | 162.5 × 76.7 × 8.5 mm | Oppo Find X3 Pro is slightly taller, Xiaomi is wider and thicker, and both have similar overall volume. |
| Weight | 193g | 210g | Oppo Find X3 Pro is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for long use. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.7" | 6.67" | Negligible size difference, both offer large, immersive displays. |
| Resolution | 1440x3216 | 1080x2400 | Oppo Find X3 Pro has a much sharper display, resulting in clearer text and images. |
| Pixel Density | 525 PPI | 395 PPI | Oppo Find X3 Pro provides a significantly crisper viewing experience. |
| Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Both offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Both offer smooth scrolling and animations. |
| Brightness | 1300 nits | 0 nits | Oppo Find X3 Pro is much better for outdoor visibility. Xiaomi Poco F4 GT's brightness is not provided, making outdoor visibility a concern. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT has a newer, faster chip. |
| Antutu Score | 876,500 | 1,178,365 | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT has better performance in benchmark tests, indicating better overall speed for app loading and smoother gameplay. |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 730 | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT offers a better GPU for graphics-intensive tasks. |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56" | 64MP, f/1.73, 1/1.7" | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT has higher resolution, while Oppo has a larger sensor. |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74" | 20MP, f/2.4, 1/2" | Oppo has a higher resolution selfie camera, but the sensor size is not larger. |
| Telephoto Lens | 13MP, f/2.4, 1/3.4" | None | Oppo Find X3 Pro provides optical zoom capability. |
| Wide-Angle Lens | 50MP, f/2.2, 1/1.56" | 8MP, f/2.2, 1/4" | Oppo has a vastly superior wide-angle camera with much higher resolution and larger sensor. |
| Macro Lens | None | 2MP, f/2.4 | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT has a dedicated macro lens for close-up shots. |
| Video | Up to 4K@60fps with HDR, EIS | Up to 4K@60fps with HDR | Both have good video recording; Oppo has more options and stabilization. |
| DXOMark Score | 128 (Mobile) | Not Available | Oppo's camera performance is validated with a benchmark score; Xiaomi's score is not available. |
| Camera Features | OIS, PDAF, CDAF, RAW, Optical Zoom | Gimbal, LAF, Night Mode, Dual Capture, Flicker Sensor | Different strengths in camera features. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 4700mAh | Xiaomi has slightly larger battery but the difference is marginal. |
| Charging | 65W Fast Charging, Li-Polymer | 120W Fast Charging, Li-Ion | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT charges significantly faster. |
| Features | Wireless charging, Reverse charging | None | Oppo offers more battery convenience options. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11, Max 14 | Android 12, Max 13 | Xiaomi has a newer initial OS, but the Oppo can update to a higher Android version. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6, Dual-band, MiMO | Wi-Fi 6, Dual-band, MiMO | Similar Wi-Fi capabilities. |
| Bluetooth | 5.2, LE, APT-x, LDAC | 5.2, LE, LDAC | Oppo supports APT-x for higher quality Bluetooth audio. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | Oppo has more satellite systems, for potentially better location accuracy. |
| SIM | Dual Nano SIM | Dual Nano SIM | Both phones support Dual SIM, Dual Standby capabilities. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 256/512GB | 128/256GB | Oppo Find X3 Pro offers larger storage options up to 512GB. |
| RAM | 12/16GB | 8/12GB | Oppo offers more RAM for smoother multitasking. |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone supports expandable storage. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers, 3 microphones | Xiaomi has additional features for high-quality audio and better voice capture. |
| Security | |||
| Features | In-display fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Xiaomi has a convenient and faster side-mounted fingerprint sensor |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Xiaomi has superior screen protection. |
| Sensors | |||
| Sensors | Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Ultrasonic proximity | Both phones have similar sensors with slight differences in specifics. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Oppo Find X3 Pro Advantages:
- Superior Display: Higher resolution (1440x3216), sharper pixel density (525 PPI) for a crisper viewing experience.
- Better Outdoor Visibility: Significantly higher brightness (1300 nits) for easier use in bright sunlight.
- More Camera Versatility: Telephoto lens for optical zoom, higher resolution wide-angle lens with larger sensor. Quadruple camera setup.
- More Battery Features: Wireless charging, reverse wireless charging, and reverse charging provide enhanced convenience.
- Higher RAM and Storage: Offers 16GB of RAM and up to 512GB of internal storage (depending on the configuration).
- Better Bluetooth Audio: Includes APT-x codec for potentially higher fidelity wireless audio.
- More GPS satellites: Includes more satellite systems, for better location accuracy.
- Camera Benchmarking: Has a DXOMark rating, providing an idea of camera quality.
- Android 14 Update: Can update to Android 14, whereas the Xiaomi maxes out at Android 13.
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Advantages:
- Faster Performance: Newer Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset and significantly higher benchmark score for faster performance.
- Faster Charging: Much faster 120W charging.
- Macro Lens: Dedicated macro lens for close-up photography.
- Enhanced Audio: Includes Hi-Res Audio and 3 microphones for superior audio and voice capture.
- Superior Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus for better durability.
- Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor: Provides a more convenient and faster unlocking experience.
- Newer Operating System: Ships with a newer version of Android.
- Gimbal Stabilization: Provides better video stabilization.
Trade-offs:
- The Oppo Find X3 Pro, while having a superior display and camera system, is older and has lower processing power. It also lacks a macro lens.
- The Xiaomi Poco F4 GT has superior performance and charging but lacks the display sharpness and camera versatility of the Oppo, along with some battery convenience features.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Oppo Find X3 Pro is ideal for:
- Multimedia Enthusiasts: Users who prioritize display quality, vibrant colors, and sharp details for consuming video content and enjoying visual media.
- Photography Lovers: Users who want versatile camera options, including telephoto, wide-angle, and higher-quality main sensors, as well as OIS.
- Power Users: Those who need large storage for photos, videos, and apps, as well as a large RAM.
- Users Who Value Convenience: People who rely on wireless charging and reverse charging.
Specific Use Cases:
- Traveling: High-quality camera system for travel photography and videos.
- Content Creation: Superior display for accurate color editing and detailed viewing.
- Daily Driver: Large storage for various apps and data, smooth multitasking, wireless charging for convenience.
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT is ideal for:
- Mobile Gamers: Users who prioritize fast performance, smooth gameplay, and quick charging.
- Performance-Focused Users: Those who want the latest chipset and the highest benchmark scores for demanding tasks and app usage.
- Audio Enthusiasts: Users who value high-quality audio playback and recording.
- Users Needing Fast Charging: People who require a quick charge to stay powered up on the go.
Specific Use Cases:
- Gaming: High performance and fast charging for gaming marathons.
- Demanding Apps: Running heavy applications and multitasking with smooth performance.
- Quick Charging: Top-up during short breaks.
Price-to-Value:
- The Oppo Find X3 Pro, being older, may be available at a lower price, offering great value for its display and camera capabilities.
- The Xiaomi Poco F4 GT may come with a higher price due to its newer chipset and high performance.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions:
- Do you prioritize display quality or raw performance? (Oppo for display, Xiaomi for performance).
- Do you need versatile camera features, or are gaming and fast charging more important? (Oppo for versatility, Xiaomi for gaming/charging).
- How important are features like wireless charging, reverse charging, or the convenience of a side-mounted fingerprint sensor? (Oppo for wireless charging, Xiaomi for side fingerprint).
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: You mostly use your phone for media consumption, browsing, and taking photos.
- Recommendation: Oppo Find X3 Pro provides a superior viewing experience and camera system.
- Scenario 2: You play intensive games, need the fastest performance, and prefer quick charging.
- Recommendation: Xiaomi Poco F4 GT is the better choice.
- Scenario 3: You want a well-rounded experience, with a good display, camera, and fast charging, but you are on a budget.
- Recommendation: Consider price differences. The Oppo Find X3 Pro might be more affordable now and provide very good value.
My Choice
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would personally lean towards the Oppo Find X3 Pro. While the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT has a more powerful processor and faster charging, my personal priorities align more with the Oppo's strengths. The significantly better display, with its higher resolution and pixel density, is a major factor for me, as I consume a lot of video content. Additionally, I prioritize a better camera system with more versatility, especially the optical zoom provided by the telephoto lens and the superior wide-angle camera. While gaming is something I do occasionally, it isn't the primary function of my phone. Finally, the inclusion of wireless charging and reverse charging adds a level of convenience that I value highly. While the faster charging of the Xiaomi is certainly appealing, the overall advantages of the Oppo in display and camera, combined with its potential for a lower price point, make it a better fit for my needs. I appreciate the validation that comes with the DXOMark rating, even if it is just for the camera performance. This is not to say that the Poco is a bad phone. It is just that the Oppo is a better fit for my particular use case.
