Oppo Find X3 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F4 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 June 27, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 100.48 cm³ 95.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.47 "/g 3.42 "/g
Weight 193 g 195 g
Height 163.6 mm 163.2 mm
Width 74 mm 76 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 7.7 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • White
  • Gloss Black
  • Cosmic Mocha
  • Mars Edition
  • Photographer Edition
  • Night Black
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Nebula Green

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1440 x 3216 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.2 % 86.6 %
Pixel Density 525 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 900 nits
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 1300 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 100.25 mAh/in² 101.15 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.78 mAh/cm³ 47.12 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585)
GPU Adreno 660 Adreno 650

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 14 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProXiaomi Poco F4Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.6 × 74 × 8.3 mm163.2 × 76 × 7.7 mmOppo Find X3 Pro is slightly taller and thicker, while Xiaomi Poco F4 is a bit wider; differences are minor and impact pocketability negligibly
Weight193g195gBoth are similarly weighted, feeling substantial in hand; no significant difference.
Display
Size6.7"6.67"Very similar screen sizes; both offer immersive viewing, negligible difference in practice
Resolution1440x32161080x2400Oppo Find X3 Pro's higher resolution results in a noticeably sharper display with finer details, more pleasant for reading and media consumption
Pixel Density (PPI)525395Oppo Find X3 Pro has much higher pixel density, creating sharper and more detailed image. Difference visible, especially for text and fine details
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDIdentical; both offer vibrant colors, deep blacks, and excellent contrast.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations, no practical difference for most users.
Brightness1300 nits1300 nitsIdentical peak brightness; both are easily readable even in bright sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 888 5G (5nm)Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm)Snapdragon 888 is slightly more powerful but the 870 is still very performant; in real-world use both phones feel very similar.
AnTuTu Score876,500861,200Near identical performance levels, both handle demanding tasks, with minor differences not very noticeable in regular usage
GPUAdreno 660Adreno 650Adreno 660 has a slight performance edge, though the difference won't be drastic for most gaming and graphics applications.
Camera
Main Camera Res50MP64MPXiaomi Poco F4 has slightly higher resolution, but Oppo Find X3 Pro has larger sensor and better low light performance
Main Camera Sensor1/1.56" Sony IMX7661/2" Omnivision OV64BOppo Find X3 Pro's larger sensor allows for better light gathering and improved image quality, especially in low-light situations.
Main Camera Aperturef/1.8f/1.79Similar aperture values; both perform well in various light condition
Telephoto Lens13MPNoneOppo Find X3 Pro has a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom, enhancing photography from a distance, while Xiaomi Poco F4 relies on digital zoom.
Wide Angle Lens50MP8MPOppo Find X3 Pro has a much higher resolution and larger sensor wide-angle camera, capturing superior quality ultra-wide images.
Macro LensNone2MPXiaomi Poco F4 has a dedicated macro lens for close-up photography; Oppo Find X3 Pro lacks this dedicated lens
Selfie Camera Res32MP20MPOppo Find X3 Pro captures more detail with higher resolution selfie camera
Selfie Camera Sensor1/2.74" Sony IMX6151/2" Sony IMX596Xiaomi Poco F4 has a larger sensor, potentially leading to slightly better low-light selfie performance.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@60fps w/HDR+EISUp to 4K@60fpsBoth capable of high-quality 4K video; Oppo Find X3 Pro offers HDR and EIS in more modes.
DXOMark Score128 (Main), 134 (Photo), 125 (Video)NoneOppo Find X3 Pro has a DxOMark score indicating it has a capable camera system
Battery
Capacity4500mAh4500mAhBoth have similar battery capacity; users can expect comparable battery life with normal usage.
Charging65W67WXiaomi Poco F4 offers slightly faster charging, meaning slightly less time plugged in. The difference isn't very significant.
FeaturesWireless Charging, Reverse ChargingNoneOppo Find X3 Pro has wireless charging and reverse charging, adding to its versatility.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 14)Android 12 (upgradable to 13)Xiaomi Poco F4 comes with a newer version out of the box, but Oppo Find X3 Pro is upgradable to Android 14; both will get OS updates
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6Both support similar latest standards of Wi-Fi, offering great internet speed.
Bluetooth5.2 (with AptX)5.2Both have Bluetooth 5.2 with great Bluetooth performance; Oppo Find X3 Pro also supports AptX, slightly enhancing audio quality.
GPSComprehensive GPS, GLONASS, etc.More comprehensive GPS, GLONASS, etc.Xiaomi Poco F4 supports a larger range of systems, which could improve location accuracy in specific regions.
Storage
Internal Storage256GB/512GB128GB/256GBOppo Find X3 Pro has higher maximum storage options for users who need the extra space.
RAM12GB/16GB6GB/8GB/12GBOppo Find X3 Pro can have higher RAM configurations, which aids in performance and multitasking for heavy users.
Expandable StorageNoneNoneNeither phones support expandable storage.
Audio
QualityDolby Atmos, Stereo SpeakersDolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphonesXiaomi Poco F4 has an improved audio experience with Hi-Res Audio and better mic setup
Security
FeaturesBasic Fingerprint SensorSide Mounted Fingerprint SensorSide mounted sensors tend to be more reliable than basic fingerprint sensors.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionGorilla Glass 5Gorilla Glass 5Both phones have very reliable scratch protection on the screen.
Sensors
SensorsComprehensive set of SensorsMore comprehensive set of SensorsXiaomi Poco F4's range of sensors may be better for more sophisticated use cases.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Display: Significantly higher resolution and pixel density resulting in a sharper, more detailed viewing experience.
  • Enhanced Camera System: Higher resolution main, telephoto, and ultrawide cameras with larger sensor sizes leading to better image quality, especially in low light. Includes optical zoom.
  • Wireless Charging & Reverse Charging: Offers the convenience of wireless charging and the ability to charge other devices wirelessly.
  • Larger Storage and RAM: It provides up to 512GB internal storage and 16GB of RAM.

Practical Implications:

  • Oppo Find X3 Pro is better for users who prioritize display quality and camera performance, making it ideal for media consumption, photography enthusiasts, and professionals.
  • The wireless charging features offer convenience for users on the go.

Xiaomi Poco F4 Advantages:

  • Newer Software: Ships with a newer Android version out of the box.
  • Faster Charging: Slightly faster wired charging than Oppo Find X3 Pro.
  • Hi-Res Audio: Includes Hi-Res Audio and better microphones for an improved sound experience.
  • Macro lens: Has a dedicated Macro Lens for closeup photography.
  • More comprehensive GPS system: Features better GPS performance with support for more satellite systems.
  • More Advanced Fingerprint Sensor: Includes a side-mounted fingerprint scanner that is typically faster and more accurate.

Practical Implications:

  • Xiaomi Poco F4 is a more budget-friendly option that still provides excellent performance and a newer user experience.
  • Faster charging and good audio quality makes it practical for day-to-day use and users who listen to a lot of music.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • Oppo Find X3 Pro: Lacks a dedicated macro lens and side-mounted fingerprint sensor.
  • Xiaomi Poco F4: Lacks the high-resolution display, advanced camera system and wireless charging present in the Oppo Find X3 Pro.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Pro Ideal User:

  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who need a versatile, high-quality camera system with optical zoom and excellent low-light performance.
  • Media Consumers: Users who value a high-resolution display for watching videos, browsing photos, and reading.
  • Power Users: Individuals who use their phones for multitasking and resource-intensive applications and need more storage.
  • Tech Enthusiasts: Those who appreciate the premium features and convenience of wireless charging.

Specific Use Cases:

*   Professional photography and videography
*   Extensive photo editing on the go
*   Watching high-definition movies and TV shows
*   Gaming with enhanced graphics
*   Heavy multitasking with multiple apps

Xiaomi Poco F4 Ideal User:

  • Value-Conscious Buyers: Users who want a high-performing phone without the premium price tag.
  • Everyday Users: Those who prioritize smooth performance, faster charging, good audio, and a modern user interface.
  • Gamers: Users who want good performance for gaming without breaking the bank.
  • Practical Users: Those who value a reliable fingerprint scanner and a good location system.

Specific Use Cases:

*   Everyday social media and browsing
*   Casual mobile gaming
*   Listening to music and watching videos
*   Reliable navigation and location services
*   Users who value faster charging.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Oppo Find X3 Pro is the higher-end device with premium features, typically costing more.
  • The Xiaomi Poco F4 offers excellent value for money, providing strong performance at a more affordable price point.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Do you prioritize display quality and camera capabilities? If yes, the Oppo Find X3 Pro is the better choice.
  2. Is faster charging, the latest Android OS, and value for money more important to you? The Xiaomi Poco F4 will be the better option.
  3. Do you need wireless charging and a telephoto lens for optical zoom? If yes, Oppo Find X3 Pro is the only option.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Professional Photographer: Choose the Oppo Find X3 Pro for its advanced camera system, high-resolution display, and color accuracy.
  • Scenario 2: Casual User on a Budget: The Xiaomi Poco F4 offers excellent performance for everyday use at a more affordable price.
  • Scenario 3: Power User Needing Long Battery Life: Both have similar battery life, however, the Oppo Find X3 Pro gives the advantage of wireless charging.
  • Scenario 4: Gamers: Both phones are suitable for gaming, but the Oppo Find X3 Pro has a more powerful GPU and more RAM, whereas the Xiaomi Poco F4 offers a better audio experience.
  • Scenario 5: Music Lovers: The Xiaomi Poco F4 has a Hi-Res audio experience and better microphone that make it better for listening to music.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two, I would choose the Oppo Find X3 Pro.

Reasoning:

While the Xiaomi Poco F4 offers great value and a more modern OS out of the box, my personal priority lies in having the best possible display and camera experience. The Oppo Find X3 Pro's higher resolution display and superior camera sensors would be a noticeable improvement in my daily use, especially for photography and video consumption. I also appreciate the convenience of wireless charging, even if the wired charging isn't as fast. Although the price point is higher, for my needs it will be the better choice.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.