1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Oppo Find X3 Pro | Sony Xperia 1 IV | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 163.6 × 74 × 8.3 mm | 165 × 71 × 8.2 mm | Sony is slightly taller and narrower, Oppo is wider. Minimal practical difference for most users |
| Weight | 193g | 185g | Sony is a bit lighter, potentially noticeable over extended holding |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.7" | 6.5" | Oppo has a slightly larger display, better for media consumption |
| Resolution | 1440x3216 | 1644x3840 | Sony has a significantly sharper display, better clarity especially for text and detailed graphics |
| PPI | 525 | 643 | Sony's display has significantly higher pixel density, resulting in a noticeably sharper and more detailed image |
| Technology | AMOLED | OLED | Similar display quality, both offer excellent color and contrast |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Smooth scrolling and animations, identical experience |
| Brightness | 1300 nits | 0 nits | Oppo is much brighter, significantly better for outdoor visibility under sunlight. The Sony brightness value is missing and impacts how we can fully compare the display quality. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Sony's newer chip is faster and more power-efficient, resulting in a more responsive user experience |
| AnTuTu Score | 876,500 | 1,076,100 | Sony is significantly faster, leading to smoother app loading and better overall performance |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 730 | Sony’s GPU offers superior graphics performance for gaming and demanding apps |
| Camera | |||
| Standard Camera Resolution | 50MP | 12MP | Oppo captures more detail due to higher resolution, but real-world differences are subject to software processing |
| Standard Camera Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 | Sony captures slightly more light |
| Standard Camera Pixel Size | 1.00 µm | 1.80 µm | Sony's larger pixels may offer better low-light performance despite lower resolution |
| Selfie Camera Resolution | 32MP | 12MP | Oppo captures significantly more detail |
| Selfie Camera Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.0 | Sony captures more light in selfie mode |
| Telephoto Lens Resolution | 13MP | 12MP | Oppo captures slightly more detail in telephoto shots |
| Telephoto Lens Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.3 | Sony's telephoto lens captures slightly more light |
| Wide Angle Lens Resolution | 50MP | 12MP | Oppo captures much more detail in wide-angle shots |
| ToF 3D Sensor | No | Yes | Sony has a ToF sensor for enhanced depth perception |
| Video Recording | Up to 4K@60fps | Up to 4K@120fps | Sony captures higher quality 4K video at higher frame rates, while Oppo has a more basic video setup |
| DXOMark Mobile Score | 128 | 105 | Oppo has better overall camera performance based on DXOMark scores. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | Sony has a larger battery, likely providing longer battery life |
| Charging | 65W Fast Charging | 30W Fast Charging | Oppo charges significantly faster |
| Features | Reverse charging, Wireless charging, Reverse wireless charging | Bypass charging | Oppo offers more wireless charging options, while Sony supports charging while gaming with bypass charging |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12 | Sony has a more recent out-of-the-box OS, but Oppo is upgradeable to 14 |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 | Similar Wi-Fi capabilities |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 | Similar Bluetooth versions, minor differences in supported profiles, most users won't notice a big difference. |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | Both offer similar GPS capabilities |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano) | Dual SIM (Nano + eSIM) | Sony has better SIM options allowing to switch carriers digitally |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 256GB/512GB | 256GB/512GB | Identical storage options |
| RAM | 12GB/16GB | 12GB/16GB | Identical RAM options for smooth multitasking |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither support external storage |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers | Sony has the better sound quality with additional Hi-Res Audio support |
| Security | |||
| Features | Basic fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Sony has the better fingerprint scanner placement and sensor |
| Build Quality | |||
| Protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | Gorilla Glass Victus | Sony has superior screen protection |
| Sensors | |||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Barometer | Sony provides a more complete sensor suite, also useful for a variety of environmental applications |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Oppo Find X3 Pro Advantages:
- Brighter Display: Significantly higher brightness, crucial for outdoor visibility. Practical implication: Better readability in direct sunlight, essential for outdoor use and content consumption.
- Faster Charging: 65W charging speeds, allows for quicker battery replenishment. Practical implication: Reduced downtime and more convenient charging experience for busy users.
- Better Camera Performance: Better overall photo and video quality based on DXOMark scores
- More flexible Wireless Charging: Wireless, reverse wireless charging is present Practical implication: more convenient charging options.
Sony Xperia 1 IV Advantages:
- Sharper Display: Higher resolution and pixel density provide a superior viewing experience. Practical implication: Crisper text and visuals, better for detailed content and gaming.
- Superior Performance: Newer and faster processor, resulting in a snappier experience. Practical implication: Faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
- Larger Battery: Larger capacity offers more usage time. Practical implication: Longer battery life between charges, better for users with heavy usage and travel.
- Better Screen Protection: Gorilla Glass Victus provides stronger scratch resistance. Practical implication: More durable screen, reduced risk of damage from daily wear.
- Hi-Res Audio: higher quality audio playback Practical implication: better audio immersion.
- eSIM Support: Allows switching carriers digitally. Practical implication: Convenient for travelers and those frequently switching plans
- ToF 3D Sensor: Enhanced depth data for camera features. Practical implication: Better bokeh effect in portraits and potentially faster autofocus in certain lighting scenarios.
- Ultra Stable Video: provides a better video stabilization.
Trade-offs:
- Oppo: Sacrifices display sharpness and processing power for brightness and charging speed.
- Sony: Trades off the fast charging and brightness for a sharper display, better performance, and overall battery life.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Oppo Find X3 Pro - Ideal User:
- Outdoor Enthusiasts: Users who frequently use their phones in bright sunlight.
- Power Users (Charging-Focused): Users who prioritize fast charging over maximum battery life.
- Mobile Photographers: Users who prioritize camera versatility and quality
Use Cases:
- Outdoor navigation and map usage: The bright display will be easy to view even in direct sunlight.
- Capturing photos and videos in various lighting conditions: Camera excels in a variety of scenarios.
- Quickly topping up battery between meetings or activities: Faster charging allows for minimal downtime.
Sony Xperia 1 IV - Ideal User:
- Media Consumers: Users who prioritize display quality for movies and videos.
- Gamers: Users who demand top-tier performance for demanding mobile games.
- Professionals: Users who need a combination of performance, and modern features.
- Frequent Travelers: Users who need a phone that can be used for a longer period of time and has eSIM support.
Use Cases:
- Watching high-resolution movies and videos: Sharper screen for optimal viewing experiences.
- Playing graphically intensive games: Powerful chipset ensures a smooth gaming experience.
- Multitasking with multiple apps: Ample RAM and processing power ensure no lag.
- Frequent international travel: eSIM support allows easy switching of carriers and roaming.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- What is your priority: display visibility or display sharpness? If you often use your phone outdoors, the Oppo's brighter screen is better. If you watch a lot of detailed content, the Sony's sharper screen may be preferable.
- Do you prioritize fast charging or long battery life? The Oppo charges much faster, but the Sony lasts longer on a charge.
- Which matters more for your camera usage: overall quality or versatility? Oppo provides more versatile camera options while the Sony provides generally better photo and video output.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Frequent Traveler / Remote worker: The Sony is better due to its better battery life, eSIM support, and Hi-Res Audio.
- Scenario 2: Outdoor Photographer/Videographer: The Oppo might be a better option due to its brighter display and better camera scores.
- Scenario 3: Gamer/Media Consumer: The Sony is better due to its processing power, sharper display and larger battery capacity.
My Choice
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would choose the Sony Xperia 1 IV. While the Oppo Find X3 Pro has a brighter display and much faster charging, the Sony's combination of a sharper display, superior processing power, a larger battery, better build quality, and additional features such as an eSIM and Hi-Res Audio make it the better choice for me. The Sony’s performance, coupled with its high-quality display and audio, would enhance my daily user experience more than the Oppo's benefits. I also prefer the additional security and environmental sensors. The superior battery life would mean less need for charging during the day. I do understand that users with specific needs may choose differently.
