1. Specifications Comparison
Design
| Feature | Oppo Find X3 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Form Factor | Standard | Foldable | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 offers a unique large screen experience that folds for better portability; Oppo Find X3 Pro is a traditional smartphone design. |
| Dimensions | 163.6 × 74 × 8.3 mm | 155.1 × 130.1 × 6.3 mm | Oppo Find X3 Pro is taller and thicker, while the Z Fold4 is significantly wider when unfolded, impacting pocketability and one-handed use. |
| Weight | 193g | 263g | Oppo Find X3 Pro is considerably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use and less fatiguing. |
| Build Quality | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | Z Fold4 offers superior scratch and drop protection on its display compared to the Find X3 Pro. |
Display
| Feature | Oppo Find X3 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | 6.7" | 7.6" | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 offers a larger display, better for multitasking and media consumption; Oppo Find X3 Pro is more compact and pocketable. |
| Resolution | 1440x3216 | 1812x2176 | Oppo Find X3 Pro has a slightly higher resolution which translates to a sharper image on a smaller display. |
| Pixel Density | 525 ppi | 373 ppi | Oppo Find X3 Pro has a significantly sharper display, resulting in finer details and clearer text. |
| Technology | AMOLED | (not specified) | Oppo Find X3 Pro uses AMOLED which provides deeper blacks, better contrast, and more vibrant colors. The absence of this spec for Z Fold 4 means it is not possible to compare. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Both phones offer smooth scrolling and animations; Users will likely not notice a difference. |
| Brightness | 1300 nits | 0 nits (not specified) | Oppo Find X3 Pro offers much better visibility in bright sunlight thanks to its high brightness, the lack of brightness for Z Fold 4 makes a comparison impossible. |
Performance
| Feature | Oppo Find X3 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 has a more recent and powerful chipset, translating to faster performance, better app loading, and slightly smoother operation. |
| AnTuTu Score | 876,500 | 1,232,800 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 exhibits significantly superior performance, noticeable in demanding tasks and gaming. |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 730 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 has a more advanced GPU, which will handle graphics-intensive games and applications more efficiently. |
Camera
| Feature | Oppo Find X3 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Camera | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56" Sony IMX766 | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.57" Samsung GN3 | Both main sensors are very similar with the Oppo having a slightly larger sensor for slightly better light capture. |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74" Sony IMX615 | 10MP, f/2.2, 1/3.2" Sony IMX374 | Oppo Find X3 Pro offers higher resolution, while the Z Fold4's larger pixel size and wider aperture can lead to slightly better low-light selfies and better depth of field. |
| Telephoto Lens | 13MP, f/2.4, 1/3.4" Samsung S5K3M5 | 10MP, f/2.4, 1/3.9" Samsung S5K3K1 | Oppo Find X3 Pro has slightly higher resolution and a larger sensor, which should allow for slightly better zoomed shots. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 50MP, f/2.2, 1/1.56" Sony IMX766 | 13MP, f/2.2, 1/3.06" Sony IMX258 | Oppo Find X3 Pro has a significantly higher resolution and much larger sensor for superior wide-angle shots, especially in low light. |
| Video | Up to 4K@60fps with HDR and EIS | Up to 8K@24fps with HDR and EIS | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 has a better video recording capability with up to 8K resolution while both phones have HDR support. |
| DXOMark Score | Main:128 Photo:134 Video:125 | Main: 124 Photo: 131 Video: 122 | Oppo Find X3 Pro shows superior performance over Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 in DXOmark testing results. |
| Camera Features | Quad, OIS, PDAF, CDAF, 4K Video, RAW, etc. | Triple, OIS, PDAF, LAF, Dual Front Camera, Under display camera, Night Mode, RAW, etc. | Oppo Find X3 Pro includes a Quad camera system with advanced autofocus systems, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 includes a dual front camera setup and night mode. |
Battery
| Feature | Oppo Find X3 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 4400mAh | Both phones have a similar battery size, indicating comparable battery life throughout the day. |
| Charging | 65W fast charging | 25W fast charging | Oppo Find X3 Pro charges much faster, saving time, and enabling quick power-ups. |
| Features | 30W Wireless, reverse charging | 15W wireless, 9W reverse, Bypass Charging | Oppo Find X3 Pro has a faster wireless charging and slightly faster reverse wireless charging; Samsung includes bypass charging allowing to use the phone while charging without battery degredation. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Oppo Find X3 Pro Advantages:
- Sharper Display: Higher pixel density (525 ppi vs 373 ppi) leads to a significantly clearer and more detailed display.
- Brighter Display: 1300 nits brightness provides superior visibility in bright sunlight
- Faster Charging: 65W wired charging and 30W wireless are significantly faster than Samsung's 25W and 15W respectively.
- Camera: Superior wide-angle camera and stronger DXOMark scores for photo and video quality.
- Lighter: More comfortable for extended use at 193g compared to the 263g of the Z Fold 4.
- More RAM Option: 16GB option available for superior multitasking capability
- More GPS systems supported Supports more GPS systems for better location accuracy;
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 Advantages:
- Foldable Display: Unique, large, foldable screen offers a tablet-like experience, ideal for multitasking and media consumption.
- Newer Chipset: The new chipset means faster processing and a newer operating system.
- Larger Display Size: Significantly larger 7.6" display when unfolded compared to 6.7" display on the Oppo, better for media consumption and productivity.
- Higher Internal Storage Option: 1024 GB option provides significantly more storage space than the Oppo.
- More comprehensive Bluetooth features: Supports a wider array of Bluetooth audio profiles.
- Latest Android OS: Comes with a newer operating system and is slated to receive more updates.
- eSIM Support: Allows for dual SIM functionality using an eSIM.
- Bypass Charging Allowing use of the phone while charging without degrading battery health
- More sensors: The inclusion of more sensors like the barometer, hall and geomagnetic sensors.
Trade-offs:
- Oppo Find X3 Pro: Lacks foldable design and slightly older chipset and OS.
- Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4: Is heavier, larger when unfolded, with a less sharp display, slower charging, and a higher price point.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Oppo Find X3 Pro:
- Ideal User: Users who prioritize a traditional smartphone experience, high-quality display and camera performance, fast charging, and a comfortable weight.
- Use Cases:
- Photography Enthusiasts: High-resolution wide-angle and great overall camera quality will suit well.
- Daily Users: Benefit from the sharp display, fast charging, and comfortable weight.
- Gamers Will be able to perform well with the Adreno 660 and the 16 GB RAM option.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4:
- Ideal User: Users who value a large, versatile display for multitasking, media consumption, and a more unique mobile experience with the foldable design.
- Use Cases:
- Multitasking Professionals: Large screen enables split-screen apps, and is great for on-the-go work.
- Media Consumers: Large display excellent for watching videos and reading articles.
- Tech Enthusiasts: Unique foldable form factor appeals to those looking for cutting-edge technology.
4. Decision Framework
Consider these questions before choosing:
Do I value a large screen, even if it's a foldable design?
- If yes, consider the Galaxy Z Fold4.
- If no, the Oppo Find X3 Pro is more convenient for traditional use.
How important is camera quality and brightness?
- If very important, the Oppo Find X3 Pro's higher-resolution cameras, higher brightness, and DXOmark performance may be preferable.
- If less critical, the Galaxy Z Fold4's camera system is adequate, and it has better video recording.
How important is charging speed, weight and chipset?
- If very important, the Oppo Find X3 Pro's superior charging speeds and significantly lighter weight may be preferable.
- If very important, the Galaxy Z Fold4's superior chipset may be preferable.
Scenario Recommendations:
- For Mobile Photographers: The Oppo Find X3 Pro is the superior choice for photo quality with superior sensors, especially the wide-angle, and better DXOMark Scores.
- For Multitasking on the Go: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4's large, foldable display provides unmatched productivity and media consumption.
- For Daily Use and Comfort: The Oppo Find X3 Pro is lighter and more pocketable and has better charging speed, making it convenient for daily tasks.
- For Gamers: The Oppo Find X3 Pro with the 16 GB Ram option may be more suitable.
Personal Choice
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would personally opt for the Oppo Find X3 Pro.
My reasoning is as follows:
- Display Quality: I value display quality a lot, the Oppo's higher pixel density and superior brightness would make for a more pleasing visual experience for me.
- Photography: I would value the camera quality of the Oppo more with its superior wide-angle camera and DXOmark scores, this would be more beneficial to my use case.
- Comfort: The lighter weight of the Oppo also makes it a better daily driver for me.
- Charging Speed: The 65W charging is also a very important feature that would be very valuable.
- Price-to-Value: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 is considerably more expensive than the Oppo Find X3 Pro while not having significantly better performance for my use cases.
While the Galaxy Z Fold4 is an impressive device with its innovative foldable design, the Oppo Find X3 Pro better suits my specific needs and priorities. It offers a more refined experience in areas I value most: display quality, camera performance, and daily usability. While the foldable technology is undoubtedly impressive, the trade-offs in display sharpness, comfort, and camera performance are not ideal for my use case.
