Smartphone Comparison: Oppo Find X3 Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Oppo Find X3 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Form Factor | Standard | Foldable | Oppo: Traditional design. Samsung: Compact when folded, unique form factor. |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm | 165.1 x 71.9 x 6.9 mm | Oppo: Wider and thicker. Samsung: Taller, thinner, and more pocketable when folded. |
| Weight | 193g | 187g | Oppo: Slightly heavier, may feel more substantial. Samsung: Lighter, more comfortable for long holding and pocketable. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.7" | 6.7" | Both offer the same viewing area. |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3216 | 1080 x 2640 | Oppo: Sharper images and text due to higher pixel count. |
| Pixel Density | 525 PPI | 426 PPI | Oppo: Noticeably clearer display with finer details. |
| Technology | AMOLED | Missing | Oppo: Deeper blacks, better contrast, and more vibrant colors. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Smooth scrolling and animations on both devices. |
| Brightness | 1300 nits | 0 nits | Oppo: Much better visibility in bright sunlight. Samsung: brightness information is missing, therefore the value might be inaccurate |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 888 (5nm) | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) | Oppo: Fast performance, but Samsung: Significantly faster, more powerful for gaming and demanding tasks. |
| AnTuTu Score | 876,500 | 2,250,000 | Oppo: Good performance. Samsung: Much faster app loading, multitasking, and gaming performance. |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 750 | Oppo: Capable graphics. Samsung: Better graphics for gaming. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 4000mAh | Oppo: Likely better battery life, more time between charges. |
| Charging | 65W Fast Charging | 25W Fast Charging | Oppo: Significantly faster charging, less time plugged into the wall. |
| Wireless Charging | 30W | 15W | Oppo: Faster wireless charging speeds. |
| Battery Features | Reverse, Wireless, Non-removable | Bypass, Reverse, Wireless, Non-removable | Oppo: Fast wireless charging and reverse wireless. Samsung: Bypass charging and faster wired charging (50% in 30min). |
| Camera | |||
| Standard | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56" sensor, 1.00µm pixels | 50MP, f/1.8 | Both offer similar resolution on the main camera. Oppo: Includes specific sensor information. |
| Selfie | 32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74" sensor, 0.80µm pixels | 10MP, f/2.2, 1.22µm pixels | Oppo: Higher resolution selfies. Samsung: Better low light performance. |
| Telephoto | 13MP, f/2.4, 1/3.4" sensor, 1.00µm pixels | None | Oppo: Offers optical zoom capabilities. |
| Wide Angle | 50MP, f/2.2, 1/1.56" sensor, 1.00µm pixels | 12MP, f/2.2 | Oppo: Higher resolution wide angle photos. |
| Video Recording | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@60/120/240fps, 720p@960fps | Both offer similar video recording capabilities. Samsung: Supports higher slow-motion recording. |
| DxOMark Main Score | 128 | 132 | Samsung: Slightly better overall camera performance. |
| DxOMark Photo Score | 134 | 132 | Oppo: Slightly better photo performance. |
| DxOMark Video Score | 125 | 128 | Samsung: Slightly better video performance. |
| Camera Features | Optical & Digital Zoom, Quad Camera, OIS, PDAF, CDAF, RAW | Digital Zoom, Dual Camera, OIS, PDAF, Tracking AF, Noise Reduction, NPU AI Engine | Oppo: Optical zoom, Quad camera, and advanced focus options. Samsung: Tracking AF, Noise reduction, dual camera, and NPU AI Engine. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 14) | Android 14 | Samsung: Newer OS out of the box. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | Both support similar Wi-Fi standards. |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 | Samsung: Newer version. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BeiDou (B1), QZSS (L1 + L5) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BeiDou (B1), Galileo (E1+E5a) | Oppo: Support more satellite system. Samsung: Supports Galileo (E1+E5a). |
| SIM | Dual Nano SIM | Dual SIM (Nano/eSIM + eSIM) | Samsung: Offers the flexibility of using two eSIMs. |
| Storage & Memory | |||
| Internal | 256/512 GB | 256/512 GB | Both offer similar storage options. |
| RAM | 12/16 GB | 12 GB | Oppo: Option for more RAM, better multitasking. |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither phone allows for memory expansion. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers | Oppo: Better audio quality with Dolby Atmos. |
| Security | |||
| Features | Basic Fingerprint Sensor | Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor | Samsung: Easier access & faster fingerprint reading. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Samsung: Superior protection from scratches and drops. |
| Sensors | |||
| Features | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Pedometer | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Barometer, Hall, Geomagnetic | Samsung: Includes a more comprehensive sensor suite. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Oppo Find X3 Pro Advantages:
- Sharper Display: Higher resolution and pixel density resulting in a visibly clearer screen.
- Brighter Display: Significantly brighter screen for excellent outdoor visibility.
- Faster Charging: Much quicker wired and wireless charging speeds.
- Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life due to larger capacity.
- Telephoto Lens: Offers optical zoom for better clarity at a distance.
- Dolby Atmos Audio: Enhanced spatial audio experience for better media consumption.
- More RAM Option: Up to 16 GB of RAM for heavy multitasking.
- More Satellite support for GPS: Better location accuracy in challenging environments.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 Advantages:
- Foldable Design: Unique, compact form factor, more pocketable when folded.
- Significantly More Powerful Performance: Faster chipset and GPU for smoother app performance, multitasking and superior gaming.
- Newer Android OS: Latest software features and security updates.
- Better Camera Performance (Overall): Although slightly by a few points, but better video and general photography.
- Newer Bluetooth version: Provides a better and stable connection with newer devices.
- Superior Screen Protection: More durable Gorilla Glass Victus 2 for better protection from scratches and drops.
- More advanced biometric sensor: Side mounted fingerprint reader is more convenient.
- More comprehensive sensor suite: It includes an Barometer for detecting atmospheric pressure and a geomagnetic sensor.
- eSIM Support: Enables easy digital carrier switching.
Trade-offs:
- Oppo: Older chipset, basic biometric sensor, traditional form factor and not as pocketable as the samsung phone.
- Samsung: Lower resolution display, lower brightness, slower charging, lack of telephoto lens, and smaller battery.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Oppo Find X3 Pro Ideal User:
- Multimedia Enthusiasts: Those who prioritize display quality, audio, and camera features (especially optical zoom).
- Power Users: Those who want fast charging and maximum battery capacity.
- Users who prefer traditional phone design
- Travelers: Users who need better GPS accuracy and more battery.
- Users who need maximum storage.
Specific Use Cases:
- Watching videos and movies, viewing high-resolution images.
- Heavy social media use, gaming on medium settings, and photography.
- Long days without easy access to charging.
- Taking detailed photos at a distance.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 Ideal User:
- Fashion-conscious users: Those who like the unique, foldable form factor for style and portability.
- Gamers and demanding users: Those who need top-tier performance and graphics.
- Users who prefer the latest Android OS and features.
- Users who want great camera performance overall.
- Users who like compact and pocketable phones.
Specific Use Cases:
- Easy one-handed usage when folded.
- Playing graphic-intensive games and multitasking between apps.
- Taking quality photos and videos.
- Using eSIM for multiple phone numbers.
- Users who require advanced biometric and additional environmental sensors.
Price-to-Value:
- The Oppo Find X3 Pro, being an older model, may offer better value now for users seeking premium features at a potentially lower cost.
- The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6, being a newer foldable model, typically carries a higher price tag.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions to Consider:
- Form Factor: Is a foldable phone with a unique form factor important to you, or do you prefer a standard smartphone design?
- Performance vs. Battery: Do you prioritize the latest chipset, graphics and software, or is faster charging, longer battery life more important?
- Display & Camera: Do you need the sharpest display with maximum brightness and optical zoom, or is overall camera quality, better software features, and the latest display technology more important?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Multimedia and Photography Enthusiast on a Budget: If you want a great screen for media, better zoom features and quick charging, the Oppo Find X3 Pro is a solid choice.
- Scenario 2: Performance and latest Features Prioritizer: If you prioritize top performance, the latest software, advanced security and want a more compact design, go for the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6.
- Scenario 3: Need a compact and pocketable device: If you want a unique, compact phone that is easy to carry and fits into your pocket, go for the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6.
My Choice
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6. While I appreciate the superior display quality and faster charging of the Oppo Find X3 Pro, the significant leap in performance offered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is too compelling to ignore. I am someone who values the latest features, and a phone that is highly pocketable while having premium features. In addition, the newer version of Android, the slightly superior camera performance, the better screen protection, better biometric, and the unique foldable design outweigh the advantages of the Oppo for my personal usage. The slightly lower battery capacity is a trade-off I am willing to make for the overall enhanced experience, and also the fact that it features bypass charging is an advantage.
