Oppo Find X3 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 August 25, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 100.48 cm³ 81.96 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.47 "/g 3.58 "/g
Weight 193 g 187 g
Height 163.6 mm 165.2 mm
Width 74 mm 71.9 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 6.9 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • White
  • Gloss Black
  • Cosmic Mocha
  • Mars Edition
  • Photographer Edition
  • Red
  • Yellow
  • Blue
  • White
  • Graphite
  • Navy
  • Pink Gold
  • Bora Purple
  • Khaki

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1440 x 3216 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.2 % 85.4 %
Pixel Density 525 PPI 426 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 100.25 mAh/in² 82.42 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.78 mAh/cm³ 45.15 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 3700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 660 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 14 14

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Oppo Find X3 Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProSamsung Galaxy Z Flip4Practical Impact
Design
Form FactorStandardFoldableZ Flip4 offers unique foldable design, more compact when folded. Find X3 Pro is a traditional slab phone.
Dimensions163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm165.2 x 71.9 x 6.9 mmZ Flip4 is taller but narrower and thinner when unfolded; X3 Pro has a larger overall volume.
Weight193g187gZ Flip4 is slightly lighter, may be more comfortable for long periods.
Display
Size6.7"6.7"Both have the same screen size.
Resolution1440 x 32161080 x 2640X3 Pro has a significantly sharper display; better for detailed content and text.
Pixel Density525 ppi426 ppiX3 Pro has a noticeably sharper and clearer image, more details are visible.
TechnologyAMOLEDNot SpecifiedX3 Pro's AMOLED offers deeper blacks, better contrast, and more vibrant colors. The absence of specified technology for Z Flip4 is a limitation.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth provide smooth scrolling and animations.
Brightness1300 nits1200 nitsX3 Pro is slightly more visible outdoors in bright sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)Z Flip4 has a newer and more powerful processor, offering better overall performance for intensive tasks.
AnTuTu Score876,5001,050,371Z Flip4 is expected to perform better in demanding apps and games.
GPUAdreno 660Adreno 730Z Flip4 has a more powerful GPU, providing better graphics performance.
Camera
Main Camera50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56"12.2MP, f/1.8, 1/2.55"X3 Pro captures more detailed images with its higher resolution and larger sensor, may result in better low-light performance.
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74"10MP, f/2.4, 1/3.2"X3 Pro has higher resolution selfie camera; captures more detailed selfies, potentially better for social media.
Telephoto Lens13MP, f/2.4, 1/3.4"NoneX3 Pro has a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom; providing better zoom quality.
Wide Angle Lens50MP, f/2.2, 1/1.56"13MP, 1/3.06"X3 Pro offers superior wide-angle images due to the higher resolution and larger sensor; More detail is captured in wide shots.
VideoUp to 4K@60fps, HDR, EISUp to 4K@60fps, HDRBoth phones offer similar video recording capabilities.
DXOMark ScoreMobile: 128, Photo: 134, Video: 125Mobile: 112, Photo: 125, Video: 113X3 Pro generally delivers better camera performance, especially in photos and video.
Battery
Capacity4500 mAh3700 mAhX3 Pro likely offers better battery life; enabling usage for extended periods without charging.
Charging65W Fast Charging25W Fast ChargingX3 Pro charges significantly faster; allowing quick power-ups.
Wireless Charge30W Wireless, Reverse Wireless Charging15W Wireless, 4.5W Reverse WirelessX3 Pro charges wirelessly faster, offering greater convenience.
Other
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 14)Android 12 (upgradable to 14)Z Flip4 starts with a newer Android version, both phones can be updated to Android 14.
Storage256GB/512GB128GB/256GB/512GBBoth offers up to 512 GB of storage; user should choose depending on storage needs.
RAM12GB/16GB8GBX3 Pro offers more RAM, which can be beneficial for heavy multitasking and gaming.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone offers expandable storage.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Display: Higher resolution and pixel density providing a sharper and clearer display. AMOLED technology ensures vibrant colors and deep blacks.
  • Better Camera System: Higher resolution main and wide-angle sensors, dedicated telephoto lens, better overall DXOMark scores, and additional features like RAW capture, digital image stabilization.
  • Larger Battery & Faster Charging: Significantly larger battery capacity and much faster 65W wired and 30W wireless charging, which translates to longer usage and quick power-ups.
  • More RAM: Up to 16 GB of RAM which is better for heavy multitasking and gaming.
  • Dolby Atmos: Enhanced audio experience for a richer, more immersive sound.
  • Advanced GPS: Wider selection of satellite systems for more accurate location tracking.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Unique, compact, and pocketable form factor when folded.
  • Newer Chipset: The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers improved performance and power efficiency.
  • Side-mounted fingerprint sensor: More intuitive and quicker to unlock.
  • eSIM Support: Offers more flexibility when switching carriers.
  • Bypass Charging: Can be beneficial during extended gaming sessions or other intensive tasks.
  • Superior Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus offers superior screen protection against scratches.

Trade-offs:

  • Oppo Find X3 Pro sacrifices the novelty and portability of a foldable design for better camera performance, battery life, display sharpness and overall performance.
  • Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 provides a unique form factor and better chipset but compromises on camera system, battery life, display resolution, and overall camera quality, while being newer.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Pro Ideal User:

  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who prioritize high-quality photos and videos, zoom capabilities, and RAW image capture.
  • Media Consumers: Those who enjoy watching videos and browsing content with a sharp, vibrant display.
  • Power Users: Individuals who need excellent battery life and fast charging for demanding tasks, alongside ample RAM for multitasking.
  • Gamers: Those that want a high quality screen with good resolution and fast performance
  • Android Enthusiasts: Those looking for all-around flagship capabilities.

Specific Use Cases:

  • Professional photography and videography.
  • Extensive media consumption, including streaming and gaming.
  • Long travel days where battery life is essential.
  • Demanding mobile productivity tasks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 Ideal User:

  • Fashion-Conscious Users: Those who value the unique foldable design and compact form factor.
  • On-the-Go Users: People who want a phone that's easy to carry in a pocket and allows for quick interactions with a secondary small display when folded.
  • Social Media Enthusiasts: Those who find the compact form-factor appealing, as well as the versatility of taking photos/videos while the phone is partially folded.
  • Those who like the novelty of a foldable device.

Specific Use Cases:

  • Quick interactions with a smaller display while the phone is folded.
  • Taking selfies and group photos with the phone partially folded.
  • Easy and compact storage and portability.
  • Modern user that values the unique form factor.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Oppo Find X3 Pro might offer better value to users focused on camera performance, display quality, and battery life.
  • The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 offers a unique, compact, and novel foldable design, but might not be ideal for all users.

4. Decision Framework

Here are three key questions potential buyers should ask themselves:

  1. Is a foldable design a priority?
    • If yes, then the Z Flip4 is the natural choice.
    • If no, then the Find X3 Pro offers better overall specifications.
  2. Do you prioritize camera performance and display quality?
    • If yes, the Oppo Find X3 Pro is the superior option.
    • If no, then the Z Flip4 is more suitable.
  3. Do you need the best possible battery life and charging speeds?
    • If yes, the Oppo Find X3 Pro has a clear advantage.
    • If not, the Z Flip4 should be considered.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • For professional photographers or videographers: The Oppo Find X3 Pro is the better choice due to its superior camera system, RAW support, better video stabilization, and overall imaging quality.
  • For users who value portability and a unique design: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 is a great choice, being compact when folded, which is convenient for users on the go.
  • For gamers or heavy multitaskers: The Oppo Find X3 Pro with its bigger RAM and better resolution display will provide more performance for the user.
  • For casual users focused on social media and basic phone functions: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 will provide great performance with the benefit of having a novel foldable device.

My Choice and Explanation:

Personally, I would choose the Oppo Find X3 Pro. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 has an advantage in terms of chipset and being a foldable device, the X3 Pro's superior display resolution, significantly better camera capabilities (especially the telephoto lens), larger battery with much faster charging, and ample RAM are more in line with my preferences. I find the high resolution screen and more versatile camera system more appealing for daily use, media consumption, and photography. The advantages in these areas outweigh the novelty of the foldable design that the Z Flip4 offers. The larger battery and faster charging are also a significant factor for me as a daily user.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.