1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Oppo Find X3 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Launch Date | 2021-03-19 | 2024-01-24 | Samsung is significantly newer, with more modern technology |
| Dimensions | 163.6 × 74 × 8.3 mm | 162.3 × 79 × 8.6 mm | Oppo is taller and thinner, Samsung is wider and thicker; overall, Samsung is more voluminous |
| Weight | 193g | 232g | Oppo is lighter, more comfortable for extended use |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.7" | 6.8" | Negligible difference in screen real estate |
| Resolution | 1440x3216 | 1440x3120 | Both offer very sharp displays; difference is marginal |
| Pixel Density | 525 PPI | 505 PPI | Oppo's display is slightly sharper, though the difference is unlikely to be noticeable to the naked eye |
| Technology | AMOLED | Unknown | Oppo provides vibrant colors and deep blacks, Samsung's display tech is not specified |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Both offer smooth scrolling and animations |
| Brightness | 1300 nits | 2600 nits | Samsung is much better for outdoor visibility under bright sunlight |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Samsung's chip is significantly faster and more efficient for modern apps, games, and multitasking |
| AnTuTu Score | 876,500 | 1,814,869 | Samsung offers a drastically better overall performance |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) | Samsung provides a much better gaming experience |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56", Sony IMX766 | 200MP, f/1.7, 1/1.3", Samsung ISOCELL HP2 | Samsung captures significantly more detail, performs better in low light with a wider aperture and larger sensor |
| Telephoto + Portrait Camera | None | 50MP, f/2.4, 1/1.56", Sony IMX854 | Samsung has a dedicated lens for portrait and telephoto, offering better zoom and bokeh |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74", Sony IMX615 | 12MP, f/2.2, Samsung S5K3LU | Oppo offers higher resolution, but Samsung has a wider aperture. Sensor size is unknown for Samsung |
| Telephoto Lens | 13MP, f/2.4, 1/3.4", Samsung S5K3M5 | 10MP, f/3.4, 1/3.52", Sony IMX754 | Oppo has a slight edge in resolution, aperture and sensor size on its telephoto lens |
| Wide Angle Lens | 50MP, f/2.2, 1/1.56", Sony IMX766 | 12.2MP, f/2.2, 1/2.55", Sony IMX564 | Oppo captures more detail due to higher resolution and larger sensor size |
| Video | Up to 4K@60fps | Up to 8K@30fps | Samsung is capable of recording higher quality video, better for videography needs |
| DxOMark Score | Mobile: 128 | Mobile: 144 | Samsung has higher overall camera scores, better photo and video capabilities |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | Samsung has a larger battery for longer usage time |
| Charging | 65W, Li-Polymer | 45W, Li-Ion | Oppo charges significantly faster, despite the unknown battery technology of Samsung |
| Wireless Charging | 30W | 15W | Oppo provides faster wireless charging |
| Reverse Wireless Charging | Yes | 4.5W | Oppo provides more powerful reverse wireless charging |
| Software & Connectivity | |||
| OS | Android 11 (Upgradable to 14) | Android 14 (Upgradable to 21) | Samsung has a newer version of Android and will likely receive updates for longer |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E | Samsung offers faster WiFi speeds and less interference, especially in congested networks |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 | Samsung offers more connection features and stability |
| GPS | L1+L5, L1, B1, L1 + L5 | L1+L5, L1, B1, E1+E5a, L1 + L5 | Samsung supports more global navigation systems |
| SIM | Dual Nano SIM | Dual Nano/eSIM | Samsung offers eSIM support, providing more flexibility |
| Storage & Audio | |||
| Internal Storage | 256/512GB | 256/512/1024GB | Samsung offers up to 1TB of storage, ideal for users needing more space |
| RAM | 12GB/16GB | 12GB | Oppo can have more RAM, better for multitasking on older architecture |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone supports microSD cards |
| Audio | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | Noise cancellation microphone, Stereo Speakers | Both offer stereo speakers, with different additional audio features |
| Security & Build | |||
| Fingerprint Sensor | Basic | Basic | Both have standard fingerprint sensors |
| Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Armor | Samsung offers a newer, superior screen protection |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity, Fingerprint | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity, Fingerprint, Barometer, Hall, Geomagnetic | Samsung has additional environmental sensors |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Oppo Find X3 Pro Advantages:
- Lighter and Thinner: More comfortable for long use and portability.
- Faster Charging: 65W wired and 30W wireless charging offers much faster recharge times.
- Higher Resolution Selfie Camera: Potentially better detail in selfie photos.
- Slightly sharper screen: The 20PPI difference may not be noticeable to most users, though.
- Larger telephoto and wide angle sensor sizes: Potential for better performance in those modes.
- Potentially more RAM: 16GB option provides more RAM for multitasking, especially on older architecture
- Dolby Atmos: Superior audio output for headphones and speakers
- Reverse Wireless Charging: More powerful reverse wireless charging to charge accessories
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Advantages:
- Significantly Newer and More Powerful: Latest Snapdragon chip offers substantial performance and efficiency gains.
- Brighter Display: Much better outdoor visibility in bright sunlight.
- Much Better Main Camera: Higher resolution, larger sensor, and wider aperture for superior image quality.
- Dedicated Telephoto + Portrait Lens: More versatile camera system for diverse shooting scenarios.
- Significantly Higher AnTuTu score: Drastically better performance across the board
- Larger Battery: Likely provides better battery life.
- 8K Video Recording: Professional-grade video quality for high-resolution content creation.
- Newer Android version and longer support: Up-to-date features, security patches, and OS upgrades.
- More Versatile Connectivity: Supports newer WiFi standard, Bluetooth, and global navigation systems.
- Higher Storage Option: Offers up to 1 TB of internal storage
- Better Screen Protection: More resistant to scratches and drops
Significant Trade-offs:
- Oppo: Significantly weaker performance, and inferior main camera for modern use cases, but faster charging.
- Samsung: Heavier and thicker, slower wired charging speed, and less powerful reverse wireless charging
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Oppo Find X3 Pro:
- Ideal User:
- Users who prioritize a lightweight phone with fast charging capabilities.
- Users who are more focused on audio quality and want Dolby Atmos.
- Users who do not need the latest chip and can sacrifice performance for other aspects.
- Use Cases:
- Everyday use, light browsing, social media, and media consumption.
- Users needing fast charging who don't play graphic-intensive games
- Users who prioritize audio fidelity
- Travelers looking for a lighter device to carry around
- Price-to-value: Good value if acquired at a significantly discounted price, due to it's older technology.
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra:
- Ideal User:
- Power users who want the best possible performance for demanding tasks.
- Photographers and videographers seeking top-tier camera quality and features.
- Users who want a modern and future-proof smartphone with latest software features and connectivity.
- Users who need maximum display brightness and large storage capacity.
- Use Cases:
- Gaming, content creation, professional photography, and video recording.
- Business users who need high performance and connectivity.
- Users who want the best possible performance and camera experience available.
- Users who often use their phone in bright outdoor conditions.
- Price-to-value: Premium pricing, but offers the best of everything in this comparison.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- Performance Needs: Do you prioritize top-tier performance and future-proofing, or is good enough sufficient?
- Camera Requirements: Is a high-resolution main camera with advanced features a priority, or are good enough photos and videos acceptable?
- Usage Scenario: Will you use your phone in bright outdoor conditions often, or are you mostly indoors? Do you require fast charging capabilities?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Budget-Conscious User: If the Oppo Find X3 Pro is available at a significant discount, and performance isn't paramount, it could be a good choice due to the fast charging, lightweight design, and potentially higher RAM.
- Power User/Content Creator: The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is the clear choice. It's superior performance, display, camera, and software features justify its premium price for users who need the best of everything.
- Casual User: If the Samsung isn't too expensive, it's still a superior phone that offers better performance and features. The Oppo is good enough for casual use if it's priced substantially lower.
Final Recommendation
If I had to choose, I would pick the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra. Despite the slower wired charging speed and its heavier form factor, the overall superiority in performance, camera capabilities, display brightness, software updates, and connectivity makes it a significantly more compelling device for my needs. The newer chip, much better main camera, brighter screen, and 8K video recording are major advantages that are worth the premium price for anyone who wants a top-of-the-line smartphone experience. Although I appreciate the lighter weight and fast charging of the Oppo, the age of the phone and it's significantly worse camera and performance are deal breakers for me. The Samsung is also the more future proof option, offering a more seamless experience.
