1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Oppo Find X3 Pro | Samsung Galaxy M35 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 163.6 × 74 × 8.3 mm | 162.3 × 78.6 × 9.1 mm | Oppo is slightly taller and thinner, but Samsung is wider and bulkier. The Samsung will feel heavier and less comfortable in hand. |
| Weight | 193g | 222g | Oppo is significantly lighter (29g difference), making it more comfortable for extended use and less likely to cause fatigue. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.7" | 6.6" | Oppo has a slightly larger screen, offering a more immersive experience when watching videos and playing games. |
| Resolution | 1440x3216 | 1080x2340 | Oppo offers a much sharper display with more detail. Images and text will appear clearer compared to the Samsung. |
| Pixel Density | 525 ppi | 390 ppi | Oppo's display has a noticeably higher pixel density, resulting in a crisper and more detailed visual experience. |
| Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Both have vibrant colors, deep blacks, and good contrast. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Both will display smooth animations and scrolling, making the experience feel fluid. |
| Brightness | 1300 nits | 0 nits | Oppo's display is much brighter, making it significantly better for outdoor visibility, particularly under direct sunlight. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 888 5G (5nm) | Exynos 1380 (5nm) | Oppo has a high-end flagship chipset from 2021, which generally provides superior performance. Samsung uses a mid-range chip. |
| Antutu Score | 876,500 | 578,500 | Oppo is significantly faster, offering quicker app loading, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience. |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G68 MP5 | Oppo's GPU is more powerful, leading to better graphics performance for gaming and demanding apps. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 6000mAh | Samsung has a much larger battery, potentially resulting in significantly longer battery life, a significant benefit for users. |
| Charging | 65W Fast Charging, Li-Polymer | 25W Fast Charging, Li-Ion | Oppo charges much faster, meaning less time tethered to a charger. |
| Features | Reverse charging, 30W wireless | Non-removable | Oppo offers more versatile charging options, including wireless and reverse charging, which are not available on the Samsung. |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera Sensor | 50MP, 1/1.56" Sony IMX766 | 50MP, 1/2" Sony LYT-600 | Oppo's larger sensor typically captures more light and detail, especially in low-light conditions. |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74" Sony IMX615 | 13MP, f/2.2 | Oppo has higher resolution for selfies, potentially capturing more detail. Samsung's slightly wider aperture might help in low light. |
| Telephoto Lens | 13MP, f/2.4 | None | Oppo provides optical zoom for getting closer to subjects without losing quality. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 50MP, f/2.2, 1/1.56" Sony IMX766 | 8MP, f/2.2 | Oppo has a much higher resolution wide-angle lens, capturing more detailed and sharper wide shots. |
| Macro Lens | None | 2MP, f/2.4 | Samsung offers a dedicated macro lens for close-up photography. |
| Video | Up to 4K 60fps, HDR | Up to 4K 30fps | Oppo supports higher frame rate HDR video, offering more options and smooth footage. Both phones have video stabilization. |
| DXOMark | 128 (Mobile), 134 (Photo), 125 (Video) | N/A | Oppo’s camera performance is confirmed by DXOMark testing, suggesting higher quality photos and videos, especially in different scenarios |
| Camera Features | OIS, PDAF, Optical zoom, Quad Camera, RAW | OIS, All Pixel Omni- Directional PDAF, NPU AI Engine, Triple camera, RAW 12bits | Both have OIS, but each offers a different set of features for photography/videography enthusiast. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 14) | Android 14 | Samsung has the latest Android version, while Oppo will have been updated, but does not ship with it initially and lacks future version upgrades |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 | Both support modern Wi-Fi standards. |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 | Samsung has a newer Bluetooth version which can be slightly better for audio and energy efficiency. |
| GPS | More Systems Supported | Fewer Systems Supported | Oppo offers better location accuracy with more supported systems. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 256/512GB | 128/256GB | Oppo offers more internal storage options, a benefit if you store a lot of photos, videos, and apps. |
| RAM | 12/16GB | 6/8GB | Oppo has significantly more RAM, allowing for smoother multitasking and more apps running in the background without performance issues. |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither support expandable storage. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers | Samsung has additional "Hi-Res Audio" enhancement. Both provide good audio. |
| Security | |||
| Features | Basic Fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Samsung's side-mounted sensor is often more convenient. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Samsung uses the more premium Gorilla Glass, offering superior scratch and shatter resistance. |
| Sensors | |||
| Features | More sensors | More sensors | Each phone uses its own sensors for specific features |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Oppo Find X3 Pro Advantages:
- Superior Display: Higher resolution, higher pixel density, and significantly brighter for better outdoor visibility.
- Higher Performance: Faster chipset and GPU result in smoother app usage, better multitasking, and superior gaming performance.
- More Versatile Camera System: Offers a telephoto lens, a high-resolution wide-angle, and additional camera features such as optical zoom.
- Faster Charging: 65W charging provides much quicker replenishment of the battery.
- Wireless Charging: Offers convenient wireless charging options.
- More RAM: More RAM allows for smoother multitasking, less need to reload apps and better gaming.
- More Storage: Provides more base and higher maximum storage configuration.
- Better GPS: Supports more GPS systems for enhanced accuracy.
- Confirmed camera performance: DXOMark scores indicate higher quality for photos and videos.
Samsung Galaxy M35 Advantages:
- Significantly Larger Battery: Much longer battery life, a great benefit for those who need all-day power.
- Newer OS: Ships with Android 14 out of the box, offering the latest software features.
- Hi-Res Audio: Provides a richer audio experience for audiophiles.
- Superior Screen Protection: Gorilla Glass Victus for improved scratch and shatter resistance.
- Macro Lens: Allows for close-up macro photography.
- More convenient fingerprint sensor: Side-mounted fingerprint scanner is convenient.
Trade-offs:
- Oppo Find X3 Pro: Older OS compared to Samsung and less battery life than the M35.
- Samsung Galaxy M35: Lower performance compared to the Find X3 Pro, and the display is less sharp and bright. It also lacks advanced camera features like optical zoom and has less versatile charging options.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Oppo Find X3 Pro:
- Ideal Users: Users who prioritize display quality, performance, and camera capabilities. Those who are power users, gamers, and photographers.
- Use Cases:
- Mobile gaming at high settings.
- High-quality photo and video capture.
- Viewing media in bright outdoor environments.
- Multitasking between demanding apps.
- Users who value premium features.
Samsung Galaxy M35:
- Ideal Users: Users who prioritize long battery life, modern software, and good value for money.
- Use Cases:
- All-day usage without needing to charge frequently.
- Users who prefer a device with the latest Android OS.
- Casual photography and video.
- Everyday general use, social media, and streaming.
- Users who value reliability and affordability.
Price-to-Value Ratio:
- The Oppo Find X3 Pro was a premium phone at launch, offering top-tier specs, it is an excellent value for the features.
- The Samsung Galaxy M35 is more of a budget-friendly mid-range device, appealing to users focused on value and battery life.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions to Consider:
- Performance Needs: Do you need a phone that can handle heavy gaming and multitasking, or is basic performance adequate?
- Battery Life: Is all-day battery life a must-have, or is faster charging more important?
- Camera Priorities: Do you prioritize high-quality photos with zoom and wide-angle capabilities, or are basic camera features sufficient?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Performance Enthusiast: If you prioritize top performance for gaming and demanding apps, choose the Oppo Find X3 Pro.
- Scenario 2: Battery Life Focus: If you need a phone that can last all day (or longer), choose the Samsung Galaxy M35.
- Scenario 3: Balanced Use: If you want a good balance of features, consider which of the two is more aligned with your use case. If performance and display are important but not required as the main driver for the user, the M35 can suffice; however, for users who rely on good camera and/or performance/display the Find X3 Pro is a much better choice.
What I would choose and why:
Based on my priorities as a user and tech enthusiast, I would choose the Oppo Find X3 Pro.
Here's why:
- Display Quality: The significantly higher resolution, pixel density, and brightness are very important to me, as I frequently consume media and need clear visibility even outdoors. This makes a big difference in user experience.
- Performance: As a power user, I value the performance benefits of the Snapdragon 888 chipset and ample RAM for smooth multitasking and fast app loading.
- Camera: I appreciate the better camera setup with a telephoto lens and a high-quality wide-angle lens, providing more versatility.
- Fast Charging and wireless charging: I prefer having the option of fast wireless charging, also faster wired charging is more important than having a bigger battery.
While I appreciate the Samsung Galaxy M35's long battery life, for my use case, the superior display, camera, and performance of the Oppo Find X3 Pro are more important and make it the better choice for me. Additionally, the software of each phone is similar enough, as they are both running on a reasonably modern Android version.
