Oppo Find X3 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 April 22, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 100.48 cm³ 94.68 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.47 "/g 3.7 "/g
Weight 193 g 181 g
Height 163.6 mm 163.7 mm
Width 74 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • White
  • Gloss Black
  • Cosmic Mocha
  • Mars Edition
  • Photographer Edition
  • White
  • Gray
  • Mint

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1440 x 3216 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.2 % 87 %
Pixel Density 525 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness 1300 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 100.25 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.78 mAh/cm³ 52.81 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 660 Adreno 642L

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 14 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProSamsung Galaxy A73 5GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm163.7 x 76.1 x 7.6 mmFind X3 Pro is slightly thicker but narrower, A73 5G is slightly wider and thinner; feel in hand may vary slightly
Weight193g181gA73 5G is 12g lighter, potentially more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Size6.7"6.7"Identical screen size provides the same viewing area
Resolution1440x32161080x2400Find X3 Pro's higher resolution (1440p) results in sharper images and text, noticeably clearer visuals
Pixel Density (PPI)525393Find X3 Pro offers a much sharper display with finer detail
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth use AMOLED, providing vibrant colors and deep blacks
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzSmooth scrolling and animations for both, more fluid user experience
Brightness1300 nits0 nitsFind X3 Pro has much better outdoor visibility in bright sunlight. The A73's brightness is not provided, suggesting it may not be as bright.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 888 5G (5nm)Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm)Find X3 Pro has a more powerful processor, leading to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
AnTuTu Score876,500575,551Find X3 Pro demonstrates significantly better overall performance in benchmark tests, indicating faster overall speed.
GPUAdreno 660Adreno 642LFind X3 Pro's GPU is significantly faster, offering better graphics performance for gaming and demanding apps
Camera
Main Camera50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56" IMX766108MP, f/1.8A73 5G has higher megapixel count for potentially more detail in good lighting, Find X3 Pro has larger sensor size, potentially better low-light performance
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74" IMX61532MP, f/2.2A73 5G's wider aperture (f/2.2) may allow slightly better low-light selfies; Find X3 Pro has a smaller sensor size for selfies
Telephoto Lens13MP, f/2.4, 1/3.4"NoneFind X3 Pro has a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom capabilities, missing on the A73
Wide Angle Lens50MP, f/2.2, 1/1.56" IMX76612MP, f/2.2Find X3 Pro’s wide-angle lens captures much more detail
Portrait (Depth)None5MP, f/2.4A73 5G has a dedicated depth sensor for portrait mode, potentially better bokeh effect, missing on Find X3 Pro
Macro LensNone5MP, f/2.4A73 5G has a dedicated macro lens for close-up shots, missing on Find X3 Pro
VideoUp to 4K@60fps with HDR and EISUp to 4K@30fps with EISFind X3 Pro has additional HDR video features, potentially better video quality and greater frame rate options. A73 5G lacks HDR recording at 60fps
DxOMark128 (Mobile)Not AvailableFind X3 Pro is scored by DxOMark, no information available for A73 5G - Find X3 Pro's tested and known camera quality.
Battery
Capacity4500 mAh5000 mAhA73 5G has a larger battery, potentially longer battery life
Charging65W fast charging25W fast chargingFind X3 Pro charges much faster, significantly reducing charging times.
Features30W wireless, reverse chargingBypass ChargingFind X3 Pro has versatile charging options; A73 5G has bypass charging to reduce heat during charging while in use
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 14)Android 12 (upgradable to 16)A73 5G will likely receive OS updates for a longer period
Storage
Internal Storage256/512GB128/256GBFind X3 Pro has a higher max storage option, more room for media and apps
RAM12/16GB6/8GBFind X3 Pro has more RAM options, resulting in smoother multitasking
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone has expandable storage
Audio
QualityDolby Atmos, Stereo SpeakersDolby Atmos, Stereo SpeakersBoth phones are evenly matched in audio capabilities with identical feature scores
Connectivity
WifiWi-Fi 6, Wi-Fi MiMOWi-Fi 6Find X3 Pro has Wi-Fi MiMO for a more robust wifi connection
Bluetooth5.25.0Find X3 Pro has a newer version of bluetooth for a stronger connection and potentially better codec support
GPSGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BeiDou (B1), QZSS (L1 + L5)GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoFind X3 Pro has more GPS capabilities, which may result in a more accurate location service
Security
FeaturesBasic FingerprintBasic FingerprintBoth phones have a standard fingerprint reader
Build Quality
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass 5Both phones have the same level of screen protection
Sensors
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Gravity, PedometerFingerprint, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Geomagnetic, RGB, Ultrasonic proximity virtualBoth have common sensors, but each also has unique additions

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 888 chipset and Adreno 660 GPU provide much faster processing and graphics, making it better for gaming, heavy multitasking, and demanding apps.
  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution and pixel density (1440p, 525ppi) offer a significantly clearer and more detailed visual experience.
  • Brighter Screen: Significantly higher brightness (1300 nits) ensures better outdoor visibility in bright sunlight.
  • Better Camera System: Telephoto lens with optical zoom, higher resolution wide angle lens, more video recording options, and a generally more capable camera system including tested metrics via DxOMark.
  • Faster Charging: 65W fast charging, 30W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging allow you to spend less time tethered to the charger and provides versatility.
  • More RAM and Storage Options: The Oppo Find X3 Pro comes with an optional 16GB of RAM and 512GB of storage.
  • Advanced GPS and WiFi: Offers more accurate GPS systems and Wi-Fi MiMO for stronger connections.

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: The 5000mAh battery offers potentially longer battery life, especially for users who prioritize endurance.
  • Newer OS: Launched with Android 12, the A73 5G has potential for extended software support and feature updates, Android 16.
  • Macro and Depth Cameras: Dedicated lenses for macro photography and portrait depth effects.
  • Lighter Weight: Slightly lighter, making it potentially more comfortable to hold for extended periods.
  • Bypass Charging: Allows charging with less heat, increasing battery longevity when charging while using your phone.

Trade-offs:

  • Find X3 Pro: Slightly older OS, heavier, and lacks dedicated macro/depth camera lenses.
  • A73 5G: Significantly less powerful performance, a less sharp display, and lacks some advanced camera and charging features compared to the Find X3 Pro. The A73 also lacks a brightness spec which could be a point of concern for outdoor use.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Pro - Ideal User:

  • Power Users: Gamers, multi-taskers, and those who use resource-intensive applications benefit most from its powerful processor and GPU.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who prioritize camera quality, optical zoom, and advanced video features.
  • Users Prioritizing Display Quality: Those who value the best display clarity and outdoor visibility will appreciate the higher resolution and brightness.
  • Users Needing Fast Charging: Those who are always on the go and don't want to wait long to charge their device will appreciate the fast charging and wireless charging options.

Use Cases:

  • Playing graphics-intensive games at high settings.
  • Editing photos and videos on the go.
  • Watching high-resolution videos and enjoying detailed visuals.
  • Using the device outdoors in bright daylight.
  • Needing to charge their phone quickly.

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G - Ideal User:

  • Users Seeking Long Battery Life: Those who need a phone that can last a full day of heavy use.
  • Casual Photographers: Users who enjoy casual photography and value the dedicated macro and depth lenses.
  • Budget Conscious Users: Users who prioritize price and want a mid-range device with good overall capabilities.
  • Users who Prefer Software Longevity: If having the latest Android version is a priority, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G is the better choice.
  • Users who Often Charge while using: Bypass charging provides better thermals when charging and using your phone simultaneously

Use Cases:

  • Full-day use without needing frequent charging.
  • Casual photography of portraits and close-up shots.
  • Daily usage with social media, web browsing, and multimedia consumption.
  • Users who prioritize a good balance between features and cost.
  • Users that often charge while using.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Performance Priority: How important is fast performance for gaming and intensive tasks?
  2. Display Importance: How much do you value display sharpness, detail and outdoor brightness?
  3. Battery Needs: Do you prioritize long battery life or fast charging and versatility?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: High-Performance User. If you prioritize high performance for gaming, video editing, and demanding tasks, the Oppo Find X3 Pro is the clear choice due to its superior processor, GPU, RAM, and display.
  • Scenario 2: Battery Focused User. If you prioritize all-day battery life and budget, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G with it's larger battery and solid features will be the choice.
  • Scenario 3: Balanced User. If you want a balance of features and budget, the A73 5G may be sufficient, but if you want the most high quality experience, the Oppo Find X3 Pro is the superior choice, despite the older OS.
  • Scenario 4: Software Longevity. If you want more software updates in the long run, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G is the clear choice.

My Choice

Given these options and based on a personal need for higher performance and a superior camera and display, I would choose the Oppo Find X3 Pro. While the Samsung A73 5G has a slightly larger battery and is a bit lighter, the performance differences between the Snapdragon 888 and the Snapdragon 778G are substantial. The Find X3 Pro's screen, camera, and charging versatility also make it a much more appealing device, particularly for gaming, content creation, and high-resolution media consumption. The additional RAM and storage available on the Find X3 Pro is also a significant benefit. The software on both devices is well-supported with up-to-date updates, and while the Find X3 Pro may have fewer updates due to its older launch date, I'd still choose it based on my needs for the device.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.