Oppo Find X3 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 March 19, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 100.48 cm³ 100.87 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.47 "/g 3.44 "/g
Weight 193 g 189 g
Height 163.6 mm 159.9 mm
Width 74 mm 75.1 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • White
  • Gloss Black
  • Cosmic Mocha
  • Mars Edition
  • Photographer Edition
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1440 x 3216 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.2 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 525 PPI 407 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness 1300 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 100.25 mAh/in² 106.51 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.78 mAh/cm³ 44.61 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570)
GPU Adreno 660 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 14 14

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Oppo Find X3 Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the key specifications for the Oppo Find X3 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, along with their practical impacts:

Design

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProSamsung Galaxy A52 5GPractical Impact
Dimensions163.6 × 74 × 8.3 mm159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mmX3 Pro is taller, A52 5G is slightly wider; negligible difference in pocket feel
Weight193g189gBoth are similarly weighted; no practical difference in hand feel.
BuildStandardStandardBoth are standard smartphones, no foldable design

Display

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProSamsung Galaxy A52 5GPractical Impact
Size6.7"6.5"X3 Pro has a slightly larger viewing area for media and games
Resolution1440x32161080x2400X3 Pro offers noticeably sharper and clearer images, especially for text and fine details
Pixel Density (PPI)525407X3 Pro display will appear more refined and less pixelated than the A52 5G
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth have vibrant colors and deep blacks typical of AMOLED panels
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations
Brightness1300 nits0 nits (spec missing)X3 Pro has much better visibility in bright sunlight

Performance

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProSamsung Galaxy A52 5GPractical Impact
ChipsetSnapdragon 888 (5 nm)Snapdragon 750G (8 nm)X3 Pro has a flagship chip leading to smoother, faster overall performance; better for demanding tasks
AnTuTu Score876,500384,853X3 Pro offers much better performance in all scenarios: gaming, multitasking, app launches
GPUAdreno 660Adreno 619X3 Pro delivers significantly better graphics performance, ideal for gaming and video editing

Camera

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProSamsung Galaxy A52 5GPractical Impact
Main Camera50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56" sensor64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7" sensorA52 5G has higher resolution, but X3 Pro has a larger sensor which can result in better light capture and low-light performance
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74" sensor32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8" sensorA52 5G has a slightly wider aperture, potentially better in low light; X3 Pro has slightly larger sensor
Telephoto Lens13MP, f/2.4, 1/3.4" sensorNot PresentX3 Pro offers optical zoom, A52 5G relies on digital zoom which reduces image quality
Wide-Angle Lens50MP, f/2.2, 1/1.56" sensor13MP, f/2.2, 1/3.1" sensorX3 Pro captures much more detailed wide-angle shots, with a much larger sensor improving image quality
Portrait/DepthNot Present5MP, f/2.4A52 5G has dedicated depth sensor; allows for better background blur in portrait photography
Macro LensNot Present5MP, f/2.4A52 5G can take detailed close up macro shots which the X3 Pro cannot
VideoUp to 4K@60fps HDR, EISUp to 4K@30fps EISX3 Pro offers more advanced video capabilities, including HDR and higher frame rates
DXOMarkMain: 128 (Photo: 134, Video: 125)Not TestedOppo Find X3 Pro demonstrates superior camera capabilities according to DXOMark testing
Additional FeaturesOptical zoom, Continuous autofocus, RAW, Phase/Contrast detectionUltra Stable Video, Night ModeX3 Pro offers more photography control, while A52 5G excels in video stabilization and night shots

Battery

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProSamsung Galaxy A52 5GPractical Impact
Capacity4500mAh4500mAhBoth have similar battery capacity, will likely offer comparable battery life
Charging65W Fast Charging25W Fast ChargingX3 Pro charges much faster, reducing downtime
Features30W Wireless Charging, Reverse ChargingQC 2.0, AFCX3 Pro offers versatile charging options, while the A52 5G supports quick charging with Qualcomm Quick Charge

Storage & Software

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProSamsung Galaxy A52 5GPractical Impact
Internal Storage256/512 GB128/256 GBX3 Pro has more storage for larger media libraries
RAM12/16 GB6/8 GBX3 Pro offers smoother multitasking and app performance due to more RAM
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone allows for additional storage via SD cards
OSAndroid 11 (up to 14)Android 11 (up to 14)Both phones are using the same version of Android.

Connectivity & Other

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProSamsung Galaxy A52 5GPractical Impact
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6, MIMOWi-Fi 5X3 Pro supports faster and more efficient Wi-Fi speeds; X3 Pro provides more consistent and reliable Wi-Fi performance
Bluetooth5.25.0X3 Pro offers more modern Bluetooth features; X3 Pro allows better audio quality with support for more codecs
GPSL1/L5 Dual BandStandardX3 Pro has higher accuracy, useful for GPS-intensive activities
Audio QualityStereo Speakers, Dolby AtmosDolby Atmos, Dolby Digital PlusX3 Pro offers more immersive experience, while A52 5G provides enhanced digital audio processing
SecurityFingerprint SensorFingerprint SensorBoth have basic biometric fingerprint unlock
SensorsFull Suite, including compassFewer SensorsX3 Pro can be used for a broader range of advanced activities; Samsung has some sensors the Oppo lacks

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Flagship Snapdragon 888 chipset offers significantly faster processing, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
  • Higher Quality Display: Sharper, higher resolution screen with higher brightness for better outdoor visibility and detail.
  • Advanced Camera System: Larger sensors, higher resolution wide-angle lens, and dedicated telephoto lens result in superior image quality and zoom capabilities.
  • Faster Charging: Much faster 65W charging significantly reduces charging times and more versatile wireless charging options.
  • More RAM and Storage: Up to 16GB of RAM and 512GB of storage capacity offer better multitasking and ample space for media.

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Advantages:

  • Portrait and Macro Lens: Dedicated lenses add extra versatility in camera features for better depth effect and close-up shots.
  • Ultra stable Video and Night Mode A52 5G offers better video stabilization and night shots
  • Potentially Lower Price: Usually positioned as a mid-range device, the A52 5G is generally more affordable than the flagship X3 Pro.

Trade-offs:

  • Oppo Find X3 Pro: Higher price, lacks dedicated macro and depth sensor.
  • Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: Lower performance, less sharp display, less versatile camera system, slower charging.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Pro:

  • Ideal Users: Power users, gamers, photography enthusiasts, users who value the best performance and features.
  • Use Cases:
    • Gaming: Provides smooth high-end graphics, fast loading times, and minimal lag.
    • Photography: Captures excellent quality photos with great detail, dynamic range, and color accuracy.
    • Media Consumption: Offers a rich viewing experience with a sharp, vibrant display and great audio.
    • Heavy Multitasking: Handles multiple apps, large files, and resource-intensive tasks without slowing down.

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G:

  • Ideal Users: General users, photographers who enjoy macro and portrait shots, budget-conscious buyers, those wanting a dependable phone for everyday tasks
  • Use Cases:
    • Everyday Use: Handles common social media, web browsing, and communication tasks.
    • Casual Photography: Captures good quality shots with versatility for macro, depth effects, and night mode.
    • Media Consumption: Offers a decent viewing experience with an AMOLED display, even if it lacks the sharpness and brightness of a flagship device.
    • Value-Oriented: Provides a feature-rich experience at a more accessible price point.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Performance Needs: How important is it to have the fastest performance for gaming, heavy multitasking, and demanding apps?
  2. Camera Requirements: Do you prioritize top-tier photography and video quality, or are additional camera features such as portrait and macro more appealing?
  3. Budget: Is a higher price justifiable for the best features and performance, or is a more affordable mid-range device sufficient?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • For the Best of the Best: If your primary concern is top-tier performance, best-in-class camera quality, and a top display with maximum brightness, the Oppo Find X3 Pro is the clear winner. It's for those who want the best features regardless of cost.
  • For Balanced Performance and Good Features: If you want a balance between cost and performance, require a dedicated macro and depth lens and better video stabilization, then the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a good choice. It provides solid performance and features at a more affordable price point.
  • For Photography Enthusiasts with a High Budget: If photography is a priority and you need the best image quality and zoom, the Oppo Find X3 Pro is the better option with its superior sensors and telephoto lens.
  • For Budget-Conscious Buyers: If your main priority is getting a decent phone with good features for a lower price, then the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G provides a better value proposition.

My Choice and Explanation

I would choose the Oppo Find X3 Pro.

While the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a good phone, the Oppo Find X3 Pro provides a much more premium experience overall. Here’s why it is my preference:

  • Performance: As someone who uses my phone heavily for multitasking, some light gaming, and content creation, the Snapdragon 888 chipset is significantly more attractive, ensuring smooth and lag-free experience.
  • Display: The higher resolution and brightness make a noticeable difference for me, especially when using the phone outdoors. I prefer the more refined, detailed look of a high-resolution screen.
  • Camera Versatility: Although I value the dedicated macro and depth sensors on the Samsung, I prioritize the improved image quality, enhanced zoom capabilities, and wider angles the Oppo provides for my personal photography style. The DxOMark score further highlights the camera's capability.
  • Battery and Charging: I frequently find myself needing quick top-ups during the day, and the faster 65W charging makes a huge difference in my routine.
  • Future-Proofing: The more advanced features and higher specs of the Oppo Find X3 Pro, make it feel like the more future-proof option.

For me, the extra cost of the Oppo Find X3 Pro is worth it for the significantly enhanced performance, display, and camera features, which align with my specific needs and how I use my phone daily. While the Samsung A52 5G is a good option, I'd rather choose the high-end performance and display of the Oppo for a more enjoyable user experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.