Oppo Find X3 Pro vs Oppo Find X3 Neo - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 March 19, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 100.48 cm³ 92.74 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.47 "/g 3.56 "/g
Weight 193 g 184 g
Height 163.6 mm 159.9 mm
Width 74 mm 72.5 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • White
  • Gloss Black
  • Cosmic Mocha
  • Mars Edition
  • Photographer Edition
  • Galactic Silver
  • Starlight Black

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.55 "
Resolution 1440 x 3216 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.2 % 89.3 %
Pixel Density 525 PPI 402 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 1100 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 100.25 mAh/in² 104.89 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.78 mAh/cm³ 48.52 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 660 Adreno 650

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 14 12

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Oppo Find X3 Pro vs. Oppo Find X3 Neo

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProOppo Find X3 NeoPractical Impact
Dimensions163.6 × 74 × 8.3 mm159.9 × 72.5 × 8 mmX3 Pro is slightly larger and thicker, potentially less comfortable in smaller hands. X3 Neo is more pocketable.
Weight193g184gX3 Neo is slightly lighter, potentially more comfortable for extended use.
BuildStandardStandardBoth are standard slab phones, not foldable.

Display

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProOppo Find X3 NeoPractical Impact
Size6.7"6.55"X3 Pro offers a slightly larger viewing area, better for multimedia consumption and gaming.
Resolution1440x32161080x2400X3 Pro offers much sharper visuals with higher pixel density, resulting in a clearer picture.
PPI525402X3 Pro display is noticeably sharper, text and images will look crisper.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth have vibrant colors and deep blacks, but X3 Pro's panel is higher resolution.
Refresh Rate120Hz90HzX3 Pro provides smoother animations and scrolling, a plus for gamers and heavy users.
Brightness1300 nits1100 nitsX3 Pro display is easier to see in bright sunlight, especially outdoors.

Performance

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProOppo Find X3 NeoPractical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)X3 Pro has a newer, more powerful chipset, offering faster overall performance and better efficiency.
Antutu Score876,500743,500X3 Pro offers noticeably better performance, especially noticeable during demanding tasks like gaming and video editing.
GPUAdreno 660Adreno 650X3 Pro has a more powerful GPU, resulting in smoother gameplay and faster graphics rendering.

Camera

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProOppo Find X3 NeoPractical Impact
Standard Camera50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56" Sony IMX76650MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56" Sony IMX766Both have excellent main cameras, with similar performance in good lighting.
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74" Sony IMX61532MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74" Sony IMX615Both offer comparable high-quality selfies.
Telephoto Lens13MP, f/2.4, 1/3.4" Samsung S5K3M513MP, f/2.4, 1/3.4" Samsung S5K3M5Both offer similar optical zoom capabilities for clear images at a distance.
Wide Angle Lens50MP, f/2.2, 1/1.56" Sony IMX76616MP, f/2.2X3 Pro's wide-angle is much higher resolution, capturing significantly more detail in wide shots.
Macro LensNone2MP, f/2.4X3 Neo has a dedicated macro lens for close-up shots; X3 Pro lacks this feature.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@60fps with HDR, EISUp to 4K@60fps with HDR, EISBoth phones offer similar video recording capabilities, with stabilization and HDR.
DxOMark ScoreMobile: 128; Photo: 134; Video: 125Mobile: 106; Photo: 104; Video: 106X3 Pro has a much better overall camera performance score. It is especially better at taking photos and recording videos.
Camera FeaturesManual Focus, RAW, 4K Video, OIS, etcDual shot, Night Mode, 4K Video, OIS, etcX3 Pro offers more manual controls and RAW image capture for advanced photography. X3 Neo has Dual shot mode and Night Mode.

Battery

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProOppo Find X3 NeoPractical Impact
Capacity4500mAh4500mAhBoth should offer comparable battery life, depending on usage.
Charging65W fast charging65W fast chargingBoth charge very quickly, minimizing downtime.
Features30W wireless charging, reverse wireless chargingReverse chargingX3 Pro offers more versatile charging options with wireless and reverse wireless charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Display: Higher resolution, higher pixel density, and a 120Hz refresh rate result in a much sharper, smoother, and more vibrant display experience.
  • More Powerful Performance: The Snapdragon 888 chipset and Adreno 660 GPU offer significantly faster performance for demanding apps and games.
  • Better Camera System: The 50MP ultrawide camera captures much more detail. Higher DxOMark scores confirm its superior image quality and video performance.
  • Wireless Charging: Includes 30W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, adding convenience.
  • Latest Software Support: Guaranteed to receive more OS updates.
  • Enhanced GPS: Supports more satellite systems for better location accuracy.
  • More RAM: Option of 16GB of RAM for heavy users.
  • More Storage: Option of 512 GB of storage.

Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages:

  • More Compact and Lightweight: The slightly smaller size and lower weight make it more comfortable for some users and easier to handle.
  • Macro Lens: Dedicated macro lens is available, which the X3 Pro does not have.
  • Dual Shot and Night Mode: Additional camera features.
  • Slightly Lower Price: This makes it a more affordable option for those looking for a premium experience on a budget.

Trade-offs:

  • Oppo Find X3 Pro: Larger and heavier, might be less comfortable for some users. More expensive.
  • Oppo Find X3 Neo: Less powerful, less impressive display, and a less advanced camera system compared to the Pro.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Pro:

  • Ideal Users: Power users, mobile gamers, photography enthusiasts, and media consumers who want the best performance and visuals.
  • Use Cases:
    • Playing graphically intensive games at high settings.
    • Editing photos and videos on the go.
    • Enjoying high-resolution content.
    • Taking high quality photos in different lighting conditions.
    • Needs cutting-edge technology and wants all the latest features.

Oppo Find X3 Neo:

  • Ideal Users: Users who want a premium experience at a more affordable price, value comfort and ease of handling.
  • Use Cases:
    • Everyday use such as browsing, social media, and communication.
    • Casual gaming and entertainment.
    • Capturing occasional photos and videos.
    • Users who want a reliable phone with decent performance that doesn't cost as much as the Pro version.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • Oppo Find X3 Pro: Offers a top-tier experience with flagship performance and features but comes at a higher price. The price premium is worth it for demanding users.
  • Oppo Find X3 Neo: Provides a great balance between price and performance, making it ideal for users who want a premium experience without breaking the bank.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. How important is display quality and refresh rate? The X3 Pro's significantly higher resolution and 120Hz display might be essential for some users.
  2. Do you need cutting-edge performance for gaming or heavy tasks? If the answer is yes, the X3 Pro's Snapdragon 888 chipset is a must.
  3. How important is the camera performance and features? The X3 Pro excels in camera performance, especially with its higher-resolution wide-angle lens and advanced DxOMark scores. The macro lens in the Neo could be a deciding factor for some users.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Performance & Display are Paramount: Choose the Oppo Find X3 Pro for its superior display, faster chipset, and advanced camera capabilities.
  • Scenario 2: Balancing Performance and Budget: Choose the Oppo Find X3 Neo for a premium experience at a more accessible price point, which is still excellent for everyday use and light gaming.
  • Scenario 3: Photography is Important: Choose the Oppo Find X3 Pro for its higher overall DxOMark score, enhanced wide-angle camera, manual controls, and RAW image capture; or choose the Oppo Find X3 Neo if you find the macro lens important.

Personal Choice

If I were to choose, I would pick the Oppo Find X3 Pro. My reasoning is based on a few key factors: The superior display with its higher resolution and 120Hz refresh rate would make a noticeable difference in my daily usage, from browsing to consuming content. I also value a high performance experience and appreciate the more powerful processor. Additionally, the improved camera system with the better wide angle lens and higher DxOMark score would allow me to capture better photos and videos. While the Find X3 Neo has its advantages, such as being more compact and having a macro lens, the performance and display enhancements on the Pro are more important to me for an overall premium experience. While more expensive, the X3 Pro's feature set offers a more compelling package for my specific usage.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.