Oppo Find X3 Pro vs Motorola ThinkPhone - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 January 29, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 100.48 cm³ 98.06 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.47 "/g 3.5 "/g
Weight 193 g 188.5 g
Height 163.6 mm 158.8 mm
Width 74 mm 74.4 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • White
  • Gloss Black
  • Cosmic Mocha
  • Mars Edition
  • Photographer Edition
  • Carbon Black

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1440 x 3216 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.2 % 89 %
Pixel Density 525 PPI 399 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 100.25 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.78 mAh/cm³ 50.99 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 660 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 3.1
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 3.1, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProMotorola ThinkPhonePractical Impact
Dimensions163.6 × 74 × 8.3 mm158.8 × 74.4 × 8.3 mmSimilar width and thickness. Oppo is slightly taller, may feel slightly less comfortable in smaller hands.
Weight193g188.5gNegligible difference in weight, both feel similar in hand.
Build Quality (Screen)Corning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass VictusMotorola has more robust scratch resistance, better long-term screen protection.

Display

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProMotorola ThinkPhonePractical Impact
Size6.7"6.6"Oppo offers a marginally larger display, potentially better for media consumption and gaming.
Resolution1440x32161080x2400Oppo's display is significantly sharper, with more detail for images and text.
Pixel Density (PPI)525399Oppo has a noticeably sharper screen; individual pixels are harder to discern on the Oppo.
TechnologyAMOLEDP-OLEDSimilar quality; both offer vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Refresh Rate120Hz144HzMotorola offers slightly smoother scrolling and animations.
Brightness1300 nits1200 nitsOppo's screen is a little easier to view in direct sunlight.

Performance

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProMotorola ThinkPhonePractical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)Motorola's chipset is significantly more powerful, leading to faster performance.
AnTuTu Score876,5001,232,700Motorola is noticeably faster in benchmarks, translating to quicker app loading and smoother overall experience.
GPUAdreno 660Adreno 730Motorola offers better graphics performance, making it a better choice for demanding games.

Camera

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProMotorola ThinkPhonePractical Impact
Main Camera50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56" Sony IMX76650MP, f/1.8, 1/1.55" Omnivision OV50ASimilar specs, likely both capture good photos in various conditions. Motorola's slightly larger sensor could capture a bit more light.
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74" Sony IMX61532MP, f/2.45Similar quality for selfies, minor difference in aperture.
Telephoto Lens13MP, f/2.4, 1/3.4"Not presentOppo offers optical zoom capabilities for more versatile photography.
Wide Angle Lens50MP, f/2.2, 1/1.56"Not presentOppo captures wide shots with high detail, ideal for landscapes and group photos.
Portrait Mode (Depth)Not present2MP, f/2.4Motorola has a dedicated depth sensor, potentially better at background blurring.
Wide Angle + MacroNot present13MP, f/2.4Motorola offers macro capability with its wide-angle lens, allowing for close-up shots.
VideoUp to 4K@60fpsUp to 8K@30fpsMotorola can record higher resolution video; both have video stabilization and slow-motion recording.
DXOMARK (Mobile)Overall: 128, Photo: 134, Video: 125Not testedOppo provides a reference for camera quality; Motorola lacks testing results.
Camera FeaturesQuadruple camera, OIS, EIS, PDAF, CDAF, Manual FocusTriple Camera, OIS, EIS, PDAFOppo offers a more versatile set of cameras with more advanced focusing features, but Motorola has 8K video recording.

Battery

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProMotorola ThinkPhonePractical Impact
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhMotorola has a larger battery, providing longer usage between charges.
Charging65W fast charging68W fast chargingMotorola charges slightly faster, reducing downtime.
Features30W wireless charging, reverse charging, reverse wireless charging15W wireless chargingOppo offers more versatile wireless charging options.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Pro Advantages

  • Higher resolution and sharper display: 1440x3216 resolution and 525 PPI for excellent visual clarity.
  • More versatile camera setup: Dedicated telephoto and wide-angle lenses.
  • More versatile wireless charging: Offers 30W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging.
  • More RAM (up to 16GB): Better multitasking capabilities with larger amount of RAM.

Motorola ThinkPhone Advantages

  • Significantly faster processor: Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers much better performance than Snapdragon 888.
  • Larger Battery: 5000 mAh versus 4500 mAh for better battery life.
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz for a smoother user experience.
  • 8K video recording: Higher resolution video recording for professional users.
  • Better Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus provides superior scratch resistance.
  • More Up-to-date Software: Ships with Android 13, providing a more modern operating system.
  • Macro lens: Dedicated macro lens for closeup shots.
  • Depth sensor: Dedicated depth sensor for better portrait mode.

Trade-offs

  • Oppo Find X3 Pro: Older chipset, lower refresh rate and smaller battery, but with better display, more versatile cameras and more wireless charging options.
  • Motorola ThinkPhone: Lacks dedicated telephoto and ultra-wide lenses, limiting its zoom and wide-angle photography options, but with better performance and battery life and higher refresh rate screen.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Pro

  • Ideal User:

    • Users who prioritize display quality and sharp visuals.
    • Enthusiasts who value versatile camera options with optical zoom and wide-angle capabilities.
    • Users who frequently use wireless charging, including reverse charging.
    • Users who want the best screen quality, even if it comes at the expense of some processing power.
  • Specific Use Cases:

    • Photo and video editing on the phone.
    • Watching high-resolution movies or videos.
    • Taking detailed landscape shots and utilizing optical zoom.
    • Frequent use of wireless charging and reverse wireless charging.
    • Gamers that prioritize display quality.

Motorola ThinkPhone

  • Ideal User:

    • Users who need top-tier performance for gaming and multitasking.
    • Users who prefer a smooth and fast user experience.
    • Those who require long battery life for all-day usage.
    • Professionals that need to create 8K video content.
    • Users who prefer the latest Android version
  • Specific Use Cases:

    • Heavy gaming and other demanding applications.
    • Long workdays away from charging points.
    • Filming videos in high resolution (8K).
    • Users who prioritize fast performance above all other features.
    • Users who are okay with less versatile camera for better battery and performance.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers

  1. What is my priority: display quality or processing power?
    • Oppo wins for display sharpness and pixel density. Motorola wins for processing power.
  2. How important is versatile camera setup with zoom and wide angle?
    • Oppo offers more versatile cameras. Motorola has more modern camera features.
  3. What is my typical use scenario: long workdays away from power or more casual usage?
    • Motorola has better battery life. Oppo has more versatile wireless charging options.

Scenario-Based Recommendations

  • For a multimedia enthusiast: If you mainly consume media and want a high-quality display, the Oppo is better.
  • For a performance-focused gamer: If you prioritize processing power and fast performance for gaming, the Motorola is the clear choice.
  • For a professional: If you take many pictures and need a versatile camera setup, the Oppo is better suited for you. But if you need long battery life and faster performance, the Motorola is a better choice.
  • For a business user: If you often work on the move and require excellent performance and long battery life, the Motorola ThinkPhone is the better pick.
  • For a general user: If you want a better rounded phone, with great performance, battery and refresh rate the Motorola is the way to go.

My Choice

If I were to choose, I would pick the Motorola ThinkPhone. While I appreciate the Oppo Find X3 Pro's impressive display and versatile camera, the Motorola ThinkPhone's significantly more powerful processor (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1) and larger battery are more crucial for my daily usage patterns. I value a smooth, fast experience, and the performance gains offered by the Motorola are a significant benefit for my needs. Additionally, the 144Hz refresh rate and Gorilla Glass Victus screen are nice upgrades that would enhance my daily interaction with the device. Although I do like the versatility of the Oppo cameras, I am more than happy with the ThinkPhone's less versatile but more modern and up-to-date camera setup. The ThinkPhone also comes with a more up-to-date OS (Android 13) which I would rather have.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.