Oppo Find X3 Pro vs Motorola Razr 50 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 100.48 cm³ 92.54 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.47 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 193 g 188.4 g
Height 163.6 mm 171.3 mm
Width 74 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 7.3 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • White
  • Gloss Black
  • Cosmic Mocha
  • Mars Edition
  • Photographer Edition
  • Koala Grey (Steel Wool)
  • Beach Sand (Pumice Stone)
  • Spritz Orange (Arabesque)

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1440 x 3216 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.2 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 525 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 100.25 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.78 mAh/cm³ 45.39 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 660 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Oppo Find X3 Pro vs. Motorola Razr 50

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProMotorola Razr 50Practical Impact
Form FactorStandardFoldableMotorola Razr 50 offers a unique foldable design, enhancing portability and offering a larger screen when unfolded. Oppo Find X3 Pro is a traditional slab phone.
Dimensions163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm171.3 x 74 x 7.3 mmMotorola Razr 50 is taller but thinner when unfolded. Both have the same width.
Weight193g188.4gBoth phones are similar in weight; slight difference isn't noticeable.

Display

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProMotorola Razr 50Practical Impact
Size6.7"6.9"Motorola Razr 50 has slightly larger display; noticeable difference when watching videos or browsing.
Resolution1440 x 32161080 x 2640Oppo Find X3 Pro offers significantly sharper images and text due to higher pixel density, ideal for reading and detailed viewing.
Pixel Density525 PPI413 PPIOppo Find X3 Pro has significantly sharper display, resulting in clearer visuals, better text rendering.
TechnologyAMOLEDNot SpecifiedOppo Find X3 Pro's AMOLED provides deeper blacks, higher contrast, and more vibrant colors, improving overall viewing experience and offering better power efficiency with dark themes. Motorola Razr 50's display technology is not specified, making a direct comparison difficult.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations; good for gaming and fluid UI.
Brightness1300 nits3000 nitsMotorola Razr 50 has vastly superior outdoor visibility in bright sunlight.

Performance

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProMotorola Razr 50Practical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5nm)MediaTek Dimensity 7300X (4nm)Snapdragon 888 is a flagship chipset from 2021, offering top-tier performance, especially in gaming and heavy apps. Dimensity 7300X is a mid-range chipset offering balanced performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming.
AnTuTu Score876,500620,395Oppo Find X3 Pro is significantly faster in benchmarks, indicating better performance for demanding tasks, smoother multitasking, and faster app loading.
GPUAdreno 660Mali-G615 MC2Oppo Find X3 Pro's GPU offers superior graphics performance; better gaming and graphics intensive apps.

Camera

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProMotorola Razr 50Practical Impact
Main Camera50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56", 1.0 µm50MP, f/1.8, 0.70 µmBoth have similar resolution; Oppo Find X3 Pro's larger sensor and pixel size will capture more light and detail.
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74", 0.8 µm32MP, f/2.4, 0.7 µmBoth have similar resolution; Oppo Find X3 Pro's larger sensor and pixel size may capture more light and detail.
Telephoto Lens13MP, f/2.4, 1/3.4", 1.0 µmNoneOppo Find X3 Pro has a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom, offering better zoomed images and versatility.
Wide-Angle Lens50MP, f/2.2, 1/1.56", 1.0 µm13MP, f/2.2, pixel size not specifiedOppo Find X3 Pro offers significantly better ultra-wide images due to higher resolution and larger sensor.
VideoUp to 4K@60fps with HDR, EISUp to 4K@30fps with EISOppo Find X3 Pro offers higher frame rate options for smoother video, and supports slow-motion at 480fps vs 120fps in Motorola. Both have video stabilization for smoother footage.
DXOMARK ScoreMain: 128 (Photo: 134, Video: 125)Main: 92 (Photo: 0, Video: 0)Oppo Find X3 Pro has significantly better camera performance, both for photos and videos.
Camera FeaturesQuad camera, Optical zoom, OIS, PDAF, CDAF, HDR, RAWDual camera, OIS, PDAF, LAF, Night Vision, RAW, Ultra stable videoOppo Find X3 Pro offers optical zoom, continuous/manual autofocus, and better HDR, while Motorola Razr 50 provides Time-Lapse, Night Vision, and Ultra stable video.

Battery

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProMotorola Razr 50Practical Impact
Capacity4500mAh4200mAhOppo Find X3 Pro has a slightly larger battery; may offer slightly longer usage time.
Charging65W Fast Charging, 30W Wireless, Reverse Wireless30W Fast Charging, 15W WirelessOppo Find X3 Pro charges much faster and has faster wireless charging capabilities, allowing for quicker top-ups and more versatile charging.
Battery FeaturesReverse charging, Non-removable, 30W wireless, Reverse wireless chargingReverse charging, Non-removable, Wireless 15WOppo Find X3 Pro offers more versatile wireless charging options.

Software

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProMotorola Razr 50Practical Impact
OSAndroid 11, upgradeable to 14Android 14Motorola Razr 50 offers the latest Android version; Oppo Find X3 Pro is upgradable, but not directly comparable.

Connectivity

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProMotorola Razr 50Practical Impact
Wi-FiWiFi 6WiFi 6EMotorola Razr 50 supports WiFi 6E offering faster speeds, lower latency, and less interference.
Bluetooth5.25.3Motorola Razr 50 has a slightly newer version of Bluetooth, potentially offering faster connection and better performance with supported devices.
GPSGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BeiDou (B1), QZSS (L1 + L5)GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, GalileoOppo Find X3 Pro supports more satellite systems for more accurate location tracking.
SIMDual SIM (Nano SIM + Nano SIM)Dual SIM (Nano SIM + Nano SIM / eSIM)Motorola Razr 50 supports eSIM for flexibility in switching carriers and having multiple plans, ideal for travel or personal and business use.

Storage

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProMotorola Razr 50Practical Impact
Internal256/512 GB256/512 GBBoth offer identical storage options; sufficient for most users.
RAM12/16 GB8/12 GBOppo Find X3 Pro offers more RAM at the higher tier, leading to smoother multitasking and faster loading times for demanding apps and games.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone offers expandable storage; users must choose the appropriate internal storage variant.

Audio

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProMotorola Razr 50Practical Impact
QualityDolby Atmos, Stereo SpeakersDolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 3 microphonesMotorola Razr 50 may provide enhanced spatial audio and improved audio capture thanks to the 3 microphones

Security

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProMotorola Razr 50Practical Impact
Fingerprint SensorBasicSide-mountedMotorola Razr 50 provides a more accessible side-mounted fingerprint sensor compared to the basic sensor on Oppo Find X3 Pro.

Build Quality

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProMotorola Razr 50Practical Impact
Screen ProtectionGorilla Glass 5Gorilla Glass VictusMotorola Razr 50 features better scratch and drop resistance with a newer version of Gorilla Glass.

Sensors

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProMotorola Razr 50Practical Impact
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, PedometerFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeOppo Find X3 Pro provides an additional pedometer sensor which could be beneficial for tracking steps and overall activity

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Display Quality: Higher resolution, sharper screen, and better contrast due to AMOLED technology.
  • Better Performance: More powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset with higher benchmark scores, ideal for heavy gaming and demanding applications.
  • Enhanced Camera System: Higher-resolution wide-angle lens, dedicated telephoto lens with optical zoom, better overall DXOMARK scores, superior video recording and extra camera features.
  • Faster Charging: Significantly faster 65W wired charging and 30W wireless charging, resulting in less charging time and more convenience.
  • More RAM (in Higher Tier): Options for 16GB RAM for better multitasking and smooth operation.
  • More accurate GPS: Supports more satellite systems for better location accuracy

Motorola Razr 50 Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Offers a unique foldable form factor for enhanced portability and a larger display when unfolded.
  • Brighter Display: Much brighter display at 3000 nits, ideal for outdoor use in direct sunlight, improving visibility drastically.
  • Newer Android OS: Comes with Android 14 out of the box, providing the latest features and security updates.
  • eSIM support: Dual SIM with the flexibility of using an eSIM.
  • Superior Screen Protection: Gorilla Glass Victus provides better scratch and drop resistance.
  • Newer Bluetooth: Bluetooth 5.3 offers more efficient wireless connectivity.
  • Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: More ergonomic and accessible for unlocking.
  • WiFi 6E: More advanced WiFi standard offering faster speeds and lower latency.
  • 3 Microphones: Potentially enhanced spatial audio and better noise cancellation.

Trade-offs:

  • Oppo Find X3 Pro: While it has an exceptional camera and performance, it's a standard smartphone lacking the portability of the Razr 50. Its screen brightness is significantly lower. The older OS may also need more immediate upgrades.
  • Motorola Razr 50: The folding mechanism may introduce potential durability issues, and the display resolution and camera system lag behind the Oppo Find X3 Pro. The performance is lower and lacks a telephoto lens and optical zoom.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Pro:

  • Ideal User: Power users, photographers, mobile gamers, or users who value top-tier display and camera performance above all else.
  • Use Cases:
    • Capturing professional-quality photos and videos.
    • Playing graphic-intensive games.
    • Editing photos and videos on the go.
    • Enjoying high-resolution media consumption.
    • Heavy multitasking.
  • Price-to-Value: Provides excellent value if high-end performance and camera quality are your priority.

Motorola Razr 50:

  • Ideal User: Users who prioritize portability, unique design, and the latest software, and bright display for better outdoor usage.
  • Use Cases:
    • Effortlessly fitting into pockets for on-the-go use.
    • Showcasing the unique design to friends and family.
    • Viewing content in bright sunlight due to the higher brightness.
    • Staying updated with the newest Android features.
    • Travelers needing dual SIM/eSIM flexibility.
  • Price-to-Value: Suitable for users willing to pay for the foldable design and unique features.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Form Factor: Do you prioritize a unique foldable design and portability (Motorola Razr 50), or a traditional, high-performing smartphone (Oppo Find X3 Pro)?
  2. Camera Needs: Do you need the absolute best photo and video quality, including optical zoom and higher resolution, (Oppo Find X3 Pro), or are you okay with a decent camera system and extra features (Motorola Razr 50)?
  3. Display Priorities: Is superior screen sharpness with high resolution and vibrant colors essential (Oppo Find X3 Pro) or is higher brightness in outdoor usage more important (Motorola Razr 50)?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1 (Photography Enthusiast): Choose the Oppo Find X3 Pro for superior camera capabilities, including the telephoto lens, higher-resolution sensors, and enhanced video recording.
  • Scenario 2 (On-the-Go User): Choose the Motorola Razr 50 for its compact, foldable design and high brightness screen for better outdoor visibility.
  • Scenario 3 (Performance Gamer): Choose the Oppo Find X3 Pro for its more powerful chipset, superior GPU, and ample RAM, ensuring smoother gaming.
  • Scenario 4 (Latest Software): Choose the Motorola Razr 50 for Android 14 out of the box and eSIM support, providing the latest OS features and dual SIM flexibility.

My Choice and Reasoning

Given my preference for a balance between performance and camera quality, I would choose the Oppo Find X3 Pro. While the Motorola Razr 50 has the unique appeal of a foldable design and superior outdoor brightness, I value the superior camera capabilities (specifically the optical zoom and video capabilities), the higher resolution display, and the significantly faster charging speeds offered by the Oppo Find X3 Pro. As a user who often takes photos and videos, edits media on the go, and occasionally plays graphic-intensive games, the Oppo Find X3 Pro better suits my needs. The older OS would be a concern, but I would hope that the device has been updated by now. While the folding mechanism and screen brightness are good, they don't provide the value I need over the camera performance of the Oppo. Therefore, the extra money spent on better performance and camera quality would be more beneficial to my use cases than the portability and bright display of the Razr 50.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.