Oppo Find X3 Pro vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 June 5, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 100.48 cm³ 88.47 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.47 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 193 g 184.5 g
Height 163.6 mm 170.8 mm
Width 74 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 7 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • White
  • Gloss Black
  • Cosmic Mocha
  • Mars Edition
  • Photographer Edition
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1440 x 3216 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.2 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 525 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 100.25 mAh/in² 79.82 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.78 mAh/cm³ 42.95 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 3800 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 660 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 14 16

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Oppo Find X3 Pro vs. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProMotorola Razr 40 UltraPractical Impact
Design
Form FactorStandardFoldableMotorola offers a unique foldable design for compact portability; Oppo is a traditional slab.
Dimensions163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm170.8 x 74 x 7 mmRazr is taller and thinner when unfolded, but the Find X3 Pro has slightly larger overall volume.
Weight193g184.5gRazr is slightly lighter, more comfortable for prolonged single-handed use.
Display
Size6.7"6.9"Razr has a marginally larger screen; both offer immersive viewing.
Resolution1440 x 32161080 x 2640Find X3 Pro offers significantly sharper text and images with higher pixel density.
Pixel Density (PPI)525413Find X3 Pro's higher pixel density results in a noticeably clearer display.
TechnologyAMOLEDUnspecifiedFind X3 Pro's AMOLED screen provides superior contrast and color vibrancy.
Refresh Rate120Hz165HzRazr offers smoother scrolling and animation; less noticeable to average user.
Brightness1300 nits1400 nitsRazr offers better outdoor visibility in bright sunlight due to higher brightness.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 888 5GSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Razr's newer chipset provides better performance and efficiency for gaming and multitasking.
Antutu Score876,5001,238,000Razr is significantly faster for demanding apps and games.
GPUAdreno 660Adreno 730Razr's newer GPU gives better graphics performance, important for gaming.
Battery
Capacity4500 mAh3800 mAhFind X3 Pro offers longer battery life for extended daily use.
Charging65W Fast Charging30W Fast ChargingFind X3 Pro charges significantly faster, reducing downtime.
Wireless Charging30W8WFind X3 Pro has faster wireless charging; much faster to wirelessly charge.
Camera
Main Camera50MP f/1.812MP f/1.5Find X3 Pro has higher resolution; Razr has wider aperture for better low light.
Selfie Camera32MP f/2.432MP f/2.45Similar front camera performance with minor aperture difference.
Telephoto Lens13MP f/2.4NoneFind X3 Pro provides optical zoom capability, better for distance shots.
Wide-Angle Lens50MP f/2.2NoneFind X3 Pro's wide-angle lens captures more in each shot.
Wide-Angle + Macro LensNone13MP f/2.2Razr captures wide angle photos and macro shots.
Video Recording4K@60fps4K@60fpsSimilar video recording capabilities; Find X3 Pro has higher slow motion framerate.
DxOMark Mobile128NoneFind X3 Pro's tested camera performance is known.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (Upgradable to 14)Android 13 (Upgradable to 16)Razr offers a newer, potentially more secure, operating system.
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6ERazr supports newer Wi-Fi standard for potentially faster speeds.
Bluetooth5.25.3Razr has a newer Bluetooth version; Find X3 Pro supports additional codecs.
SIMDual Nano SIMDual Nano SIM / eSIMRazr offers eSIM option for more flexibility.
Storage
Internal256/512 GB256/512 GBBoth offer the same storage options; no expandable storage.
RAM12/16 GB8/12 GBFind X3 Pro can offer more RAM for more intensive multitasking.
Audio
Audio QualityDolby Atmos, Stereo SpeakersDolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 3 MicrophonesRazr offers slightly enhanced audio recording due to microphones.
Security
Fingerprint SensorBasicSide-mountedRazr offers a more convenient side-mounted fingerprint sensor.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionGorilla Glass 5Gorilla Glass VictusRazr has superior screen protection for better scratch resistance.
Sensors
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeOppo Find X3 Pro additionally features Pedometer

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Display Resolution: Sharper images and text due to higher resolution (1440x3216 vs 1080x2640) and PPI (525 vs 413). This is noticeable when reading and viewing detailed content.
  • Larger Battery and Faster Charging: The 4500 mAh battery and 65W charging provide longer battery life and faster charging times, crucial for users on the go. Also has faster wireless charging (30W vs 8W).
  • Better Camera System (On Paper): A dedicated telephoto lens and wide-angle lens provide more versatile photography capabilities, missing on the Razr.
  • Potentially More RAM: Up to 16GB of RAM can handle demanding multitasking more smoothly than the Razr's maximum of 12GB.
  • Additional Bluetooth Codecs: The Find X3 Pro supports more audio codecs (APT-x, LDAC, SBC, AAC) which is better for audiophiles.
  • Pedometer: Provides basic step tracking, useful for fitness enthusiasts

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Offers a unique form factor that is much more compact when folded; makes carrying much easier.
  • Newer Chipset: The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers significantly better performance and efficiency.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: 165Hz refresh rate provides smoother animations and scrolling.
  • Brighter Display: 1400 nits brightness provides better outdoor visibility; easier to read in direct sunlight.
  • Newer Android OS: Comes with Android 13 with updates to 16.
  • eSIM Support: Provides the convenience of digital carrier switching without physical SIM.
  • Superior Screen Protection: Gorilla Glass Victus provides more durability compared to Gorilla Glass 5, so you are less likely to crack the screen.
  • 3 Microphones: Better audio recording and voice capture capabilities; higher quality audio when recording videos.
  • Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: More convenient and faster to unlock compared to standard fingerprint sensors.
  • Wide-Angle + Macro Lens: Can take macro photos for more creative shots

Trade-offs:

  • The Oppo Find X3 Pro's older chipset might feel less responsive compared to the Razr.
  • The Razr's battery capacity is smaller and may require more frequent charging.
  • The Razr doesn't have a telephoto lens for optical zoom

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Pro:

  • Ideal User: Users who prioritize display quality, battery life, and camera versatility; photography enthusiasts, media consumers.
  • Use Cases:
    • Viewing high-resolution content, like movies and photos
    • Taking photos in different situations
    • Extensive daily usage without worrying about battery life
    • Gamers and multitaskers who use demanding apps
  • Price-to-Value: Can be a good value on the used market, if found at a lower price, given its premium features, though it's an older model

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra:

  • Ideal User: Users who prioritize cutting-edge design, portability, performance, and the latest tech; early adopters and style-conscious users.
  • Use Cases:
    • Having a compact device that fits easily into pockets
    • Wanting a "wow" factor with the foldable design
    • Playing graphically intensive games and multitasking heavily
    • Utilizing the latest Android OS with eSIM and faster Wi-Fi
  • Price-to-Value: Likely to be more expensive, reflecting its innovative foldable design and newer components.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. Form Factor: Do you prefer a standard smartphone or the unique, compact form factor of a foldable?
  2. Performance vs Battery: Do you prioritize cutting-edge performance and a brighter, smoother display, or longer battery life and faster charging?
  3. Camera Needs: Do you need optical zoom, or are you okay with the standard/macro camera?

Scenario Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Photography Enthusiast: If you need a versatile camera system with optical zoom and a higher resolution display for editing photos, choose the Oppo Find X3 Pro.
  • Scenario 2: Power User On the Go: If you need cutting-edge performance, smooth display and a compact form, choose the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, but keep in mind you will likely have to charge it more often.
  • Scenario 3: Casual User: If you just want a solid phone, choose the Find X3 Pro. It's an all-rounder with a large screen, more RAM, and a versatile camera.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would choose the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. Although the Oppo Find X3 Pro has a better camera and higher resolution display, the Razr's foldable design is too attractive, and coupled with the newer chipset it's the clear choice. The convenience of a phone that folds in half and doesn't take much space in my pocket is just too good to pass up. Also, I don't really care too much about the camera.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.