Oppo Find X3 Pro vs Motorola Moto G54 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 September 5, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 100.48 cm³ 95.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.47 "/g 3.67 "/g
Weight 193 g 177 g
Height 163.6 mm 161.6 mm
Width 74 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • White
  • Gloss Black
  • Cosmic Mocha
  • Mars Edition
  • Photographer Edition
  • Midnight blue
  • Indigo blue
  • Glacier blue
  • Mint green

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1440 x 3216 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.2 % 85.5 %
Pixel Density 525 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 100.25 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.78 mAh/cm³ 52.41 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 660 IMG BXM-8-256

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Oppo Find X3 Pro vs. Motorola Moto G54

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProMotorola Moto G54Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.6 × 74 × 8.3 mm161.6 × 73.8 × 8 mmOppo slightly taller, wider, and thicker. Moto G54 is more compact and might be easier to handle with one hand.
Weight193g177gMoto G54 is significantly lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use and less tiring to hold for long periods.
Display
Size6.7"6.5"Oppo offers a slightly larger viewing area for immersive experiences.
Resolution1440x32161080x2400Oppo's higher resolution results in a significantly sharper and more detailed display, ideal for viewing high-resolution images and videos.
Pixel Density525 PPI405 PPIOppo's higher pixel density provides noticeably clearer text and images, resulting in a superior visual experience.
TechnologyAMOLEDIPS LCDOppo's AMOLED display has deeper blacks, better contrast, and more vibrant colors, making it superior for media consumption, especially in dark environments. It also improves power efficiency when using dark themes.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Brightness1300 nits0 nitsOppo's significantly higher brightness makes the screen clearly visible in direct sunlight, while the Moto G54's lack of brightness specification is concerning, suggesting poor outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 888 (5 nm)Dimensity 7020 (6 nm)Oppo's Snapdragon 888 is a high-performance chip offering significantly faster processing speeds for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The Dimensity 7020 is more of a mid-range processor.
AnTuTu Score876,500455,400Oppo has a much higher AnTuTu score, implying faster app loading, better multitasking capabilities, and overall smoother performance during demanding tasks and gaming.
GPUAdreno 660IMG BXM-8-256Oppo's Adreno 660 is a high-end GPU offering far superior graphics performance, while the IMG BXM-8-256 is more of a mid-range GPU.
Battery
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhMoto G54 has a slightly larger battery capacity, likely leading to longer battery life on a single charge.
Charging65W Fast Charging15W Fast ChargingOppo charges much faster, drastically reducing charging times and minimizing downtime.
FeaturesWireless, Reverse ChargingNon-removableOppo offers wireless and reverse wireless charging options which allows more flexibility. Moto G54 only has the non-removable option.
Camera
Standard Camera50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56"50MP, f/1.8Both have a 50MP main camera; Oppo has a larger sensor, which can result in slightly better low light performance.
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74"16MP, f/2.4Oppo has higher resolution selfie camera, potentially capturing more detailed images and better quality video.
Telephoto Lens13MP, f/2.4, 1/3.4"NoneOppo has a dedicated telephoto lens, allowing for optical zoom and better zoomed-in photos, which is absent in the Moto G54.
Wide Angle Lens50MP, f/2.2, 1/1.56"NoneOppo has a wide-angle lens for capturing expansive scenes, a feature not available on the Moto G54.
Macro LensNone2MP, f/2.4Moto G54 includes a dedicated macro lens for close-up photography, a feature missing on the Oppo Find X3 Pro.
Video4K@60fps, 1080p@240fps1080p@60fpsOppo supports higher video resolutions and frame rates, making it suitable for high-quality video recording with more flexibility.
DxOMarkMain: 128, Photo: 134, Video: 125NoneOppo has a camera tested with DxOMark, suggesting a higher overall camera quality. Moto G54 does not have data.
Camera FeaturesOIS, OIS, Digital & Optical Zoom, RAW, Quad CameraOIS, Digital Zoom, Dual Camera, Ultra Stable videoOppo offers more professional photography features like RAW capture, digital and optical zoom, while Moto G54 has "Ultra stable video" mode and a dual camera setup.
Software
OSAndroid 11, Max: 14Android 13Moto G54 has a more up-to-date base OS, but Oppo might receive upgrades to match.
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi acOppo supports the newer Wi-Fi 6 standard, offering faster speeds and better performance in congested environments.
BluetoothBluetooth 5.2Bluetooth 5.3Motorola has the more up-to-date Bluetooth.
GPSMultiple SystemsMultiple SystemsOppo has broader support for various satellite systems, potentially resulting in slightly better location accuracy.
SIMDual Nano SIMDual Nano SIM + eSIMMotorola allows you to use an eSIM, which offers more flexibility for swapping carriers.
Storage
Internal Storage256 GB or 512 GB128 GB or 256 GBOppo offers more internal storage options; 512GB variant is available for users with high storage requirements.
RAM12 GB or 16 GB4 GB or 8 GB or 12 GBOppo has more RAM which allows for better multitasking capabilities.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone offers expandable storage which may limit options for storing large media collections.
Audio
Audio QualityDolby Atmos, Stereo SpeakersDolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 MicrophonesMoto G54 may offer slightly better audio capture capabilities.
Security
FeaturesBasic Fingerprint SensorSide-Mounted FingerprintMotorola may offer faster and more convenient access for unlocking the device.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5UnknownOppo has a more durable screen due to having Corning Gorilla Glass 5.
Sensors
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope,Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, CompassOppo has additional sensors (Gyroscope) which offer more advanced functionalities.
## 2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Display: Higher resolution, pixel density, and AMOLED technology resulting in a sharper, more vibrant screen with better contrast and outdoor visibility.
  • High Performance: Significantly faster processor and GPU, making it ideal for demanding tasks, gaming, and heavy multitasking.
  • Advanced Camera System: Offers dedicated telephoto and wide-angle lenses, higher resolution front-facing camera, better video recording capabilities, and more professional photography features.
  • Faster Charging: Significantly faster 65W charging and supports wireless and reverse wireless charging, offering more convenience.
  • More RAM and Storage Options: Up to 16GB RAM and 512GB of storage is available which can improve overall performance.
  • Better Wi-Fi: Supports the Wi-Fi 6 standard for faster and more efficient network connectivity.
  • More Sensors: Includes a gyroscope for advanced sensor based functionalities and gaming.
  • Better Build Quality: Screen is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 5.

Motorola Moto G54 Advantages:

  • Lighter Design: More comfortable to hold and easier to handle for extended periods of time.
  • Larger Battery: Offers a slightly larger battery, possibly translating to slightly longer battery life.
  • More Up-to-date OS: Comes with a more recent version of Android.
  • Macro Lens: Offers a dedicated macro lens for close-up photography.
  • eSIM Support: Provides eSIM compatibility for more flexible carrier switching.
  • Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: Offers a faster and more convenient way to unlock the device.
  • Microphones: 2 Microphones allows for improved audio capture capabilities.
  • Lower Cost: Most likely the lower cost option and better value for users on a budget.

Trade-offs:

  • The Oppo Find X3 Pro sacrifices battery capacity and weight for better performance, camera features, and screen quality.
  • The Moto G54 sacrifices processing power, display quality, and advanced camera features for a more affordable price, longer battery life, and lighter design.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Pro:

  • Ideal Users: Power users, mobile gamers, photography enthusiasts, and individuals who prioritize display quality and performance.
  • Use Cases:
    • Mobile gaming: demanding games will run smoother due to better processing power.
    • Photography: Capturing high-quality images and videos using the advanced camera system and features like telephoto and wide angle lens.
    • Content creation: Editing high-resolution photos and videos with smooth performance.
    • Media consumption: Watching high-resolution videos, movies, and media on its high quality display.
    • Demanding work related tasks: Multitasking with resource-intensive apps and tasks.
  • Price-to-Value: Higher price point, but justifiable if you prioritize top-tier performance, advanced camera features, and an excellent display.

Motorola Moto G54:

  • Ideal Users: Budget-conscious consumers, general users, and individuals who prioritize battery life and ease of use over top-tier performance.
  • Use Cases:
    • Everyday usage: Web browsing, social media, emails, messaging.
    • Casual photography: Taking simple photos and videos for social media.
    • Long battery life: Users who need a phone that lasts through the day.
    • Easy to handle: Users who prefer a lighter and more compact design for handling.
    • eSIM support: Traveling users who require an easy way to switch carriers.
  • Price-to-Value: Offers good value for its price, focusing on essential features and usability.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Consider:

  1. What is your budget? The Oppo Find X3 Pro will likely be more expensive than the Moto G54.
  2. What is your primary use case? Gaming and photography vs. general everyday use.
  3. Do you prioritize screen quality, processing power, or battery life? How much do you value high resolution display vs a device with longer battery life.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Budget-Conscious User: If you prioritize affordability and battery life and still want a decent performing device for everyday tasks the Motorola Moto G54 is the better option.
  • Scenario 2: Performance Enthusiast: If you prioritize top-tier performance, gaming, photography, and display quality and are willing to pay for those features, the Oppo Find X3 Pro is the better option.
  • Scenario 3: Balanced User: If you want decent performance with a lower price point and don't have as much need for the extra features, then Motorola Moto G54 could still be considered as a good value option.

My Choice

I would choose the Oppo Find X3 Pro. Although it is an older device, its superior display, significantly faster performance, and more advanced camera system would justify the likely higher cost for my specific usage. While the Moto G54 offers a longer battery life and is lighter, the performance and display gains of the Oppo are more important to me for overall daily use and I am willing to sacrifice battery life and weight for those improvements. The differences in speed and display quality of the Oppo are noticeable and provide a significant improvement to overall user experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.