Oppo Find X3 Pro vs Motorola Moto G51 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 December 16, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 100.48 cm³ 118.69 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.47 "/g 3.27 "/g
Weight 193 g 208 g
Height 163.6 mm 170.5 mm
Width 74 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • White
  • Gloss Black
  • Cosmic Mocha
  • Mars Edition
  • Photographer Edition
  • Indigo Blue
  • Bright Silver
  • Aqua Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.8 "
Resolution 1440 x 3216 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.2 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 525 PPI 387 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 100.25 mAh/in² 108.13 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.78 mAh/cm³ 42.13 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)
GPU Adreno 660 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 14 12

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProMotorola Moto G51 5GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.6 × 74 × 8.3 mm170.5 × 76.5 × 9.1 mmThe Oppo is significantly smaller and thinner, which may lead to a more comfortable one-handed grip and easier portability. The Moto is larger, which may be less comfortable for small hands, but can provide a larger display for viewing content.
Weight193g208gThe Oppo is lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use and less tiring to hold for extended periods.
Display
Size6.7"6.8"Negligible difference in size, both offer immersive viewing experiences.
Resolution1440x32161080x2400The Oppo offers a much sharper and clearer display with significantly more detail, beneficial for viewing high-resolution content and reading small text. The Motorola has a less sharp display but may have slightly better battery life due to lower pixel density.
PPI525387The Oppo has a much sharper display, with text and images appearing clearer and less pixelated.
TechnologyAMOLEDIPS LCDThe Oppo has far superior display technology with deeper blacks, richer colors, and better contrast, making it much better for media consumption and overall visual experience. The Motorola's IPS LCD offers decent colour reproduction, but lacks deep blacks and contrasts.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth have very smooth scrolling and animations, offering great user experience.
Brightness1300 nits0 nits (Not specified)Oppo is significantly brighter making it much easier to view the display in direct sunlight. The Motorola's brightness is not specified, which may make it difficult to view in direct sunlight if its nits are not high.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm)The Oppo has a much more powerful processor, resulting in significantly faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better performance in demanding games and applications. The Motorola's chipset is less powerful and is suited to basic everyday tasks.
AnTuTu Score876,500381,000The Oppo provides a much smoother and more responsive user experience, especially in demanding tasks such as gaming and video editing. The Moto has less performance and will have longer loading times and lag when running resource intensive apps.
GPUAdreno 660Adreno 619The Oppo has a much more powerful graphics processor, resulting in significantly better gaming performance and smoother graphics rendering.
Battery
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhMotorola offers slightly longer battery life due to the larger battery capacity. However, the higher processing power and screen resolution of the Oppo will also consume more power.
Charging65W fast charging10W fast chargingThe Oppo can be charged much faster, saving time and providing greater convenience. The Motorola's slower charging will take significantly longer to fully charge.
Battery FeaturesReverse charging, 30W wireless charging, Reverse wireless chargingNone (non-removable)Oppo offers a more versatile charging experience, including wireless charging and the ability to charge other devices, whilst the Motorola only has non-removable.
Camera
Rear Main Camera50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56" sensor, Sony IMX766, 1.00 µm pixels50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76" sensor, Samsung S5KJN1, 0.64 µm pixelsThe Oppo’s larger sensor and larger pixel size should result in significantly better low-light performance, detail, and dynamic range, but both have 50MP.
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74" sensor, Sony IMX615, 0.80 µm pixels13MP, f/2.2, 1.12 µm pixelsThe Oppo's higher resolution provides more detail for selfies, however the Motorola has a wider aperture for better low-light performance.
Telephoto Lens13MP, f/2.4, 1/3.4" sensor, Samsung S5K3M5, 1.00 µm pixelsNoneThe Oppo offers optical zoom, which is better for preserving image quality when zooming.
Wide Angle Lens50MP, f/2.2, 1/1.56" sensor, Sony IMX766, 1.00 µm pixels8MP, 1.12 µm pixelsThe Oppo offers a far higher resolution wide-angle lens, providing more detailed wide angle photos.
Macro LensNone2MP, 1.75 µm pixelsMotorola can capture close-up images with the dedicated macro lens, but the 2MP resolution is quite limited. The Oppo has no macro lens.
Video4K@60fps, HDR, EIS, 1080p@240fps1080p@60fps, 1080p@240fpsThe Oppo offers much higher video recording quality with 4K resolution and HDR, making it better for capturing high-quality video content.
DxOMarkMobile: 128, Photo: 134, Video: 125NoneOppo has been tested and shown to offer better quality photos and videos.
Camera Features4K Video, Optical zoom, Quadruple camera, OISDigital zoom, Triple camera, Laser autofocusThe Oppo has a far more feature rich camera with better stabilisation and optical zoom.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 14)Android 11 (upgradable to 12)Oppo is set to receive a newer Android OS update making it more future proof.
Connectivity
WiFiWiFi 6 (802.11ax)802.11acThe Oppo supports faster and more efficient WiFi, making it better for downloading and streaming content, but both support dual band, hotspot, direct and display.
Bluetooth5.2, LE, APT-x, LDAC, SBC, AAC5.1, LE, A2DPThe Oppo has a newer version of Bluetooth offering slightly improved connectivity and audio codecs.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BeiDou (B1), QZSS (L1 + L5)GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, GalileoThe Oppo supports more satellite systems, providing more accurate location data, but both have GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, and Galileo.
SIMDual SIM Dual Standby (Nano SIM + Nano SIM)Dual SIM Dual Standby (Nano SIM + Nano SIM)Both support dual SIM capabilities for using two phone numbers on the same device.
Storage
Internal256 GB or 512 GB64 GB or 128 GBThe Oppo offers significantly more internal storage, making it more suitable for users who store large amounts of data, photos, and videos.
RAM12 GB or 16 GB4 GB or 8 GBOppo offers significantly more RAM, making it better for multitasking, running demanding apps and gaming.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither offers expandable storage.
Audio
QualityDolby Atmos, Stereo SpeakersDolby Atmos, 2 microphonesOppo provides a richer audio experience via its stereo speakers.
Security
Featuresbasic fingerprint sensorside-mounted fingerprint sensorMotorola's side-mounted fingerprint scanner is generally faster and more convenient than a basic in-display fingerprint scanner.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5UnknownOppo's screen has added protection from scratches and damage. The Motorola's screen protection is unknown.
Sensors
SensorsBiometric: Fingerprint; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeBiometric: Fingerprint; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, GyroscopeOppo is more feature-rich with a built-in compass, gravity and pedometer.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED, higher resolution, higher brightness (1300 nits), and higher pixel density (525 PPI) results in an exceptional viewing experience with vibrant colors, deep blacks, and great outdoor visibility.
  • High Performance: More powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset and Adreno 660 GPU provides significantly better performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications.
  • Advanced Camera System: Features better quality sensors, dedicated telephoto and wide angle lens, and better video recording capabilities including 4k. Also comes with OIS for better stability in photos and videos.
  • Faster Charging & Wireless Charging: 65W fast charging and 30W wireless charging provides much greater convenience and versatility.
  • More Storage & RAM: Larger internal storage and more RAM enable better multitasking and storage of more files and media.
  • Advanced Connectivity: Faster WiFi 6 and more accurate GPS features.
  • Better Build Quality: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 offers better scratch protection.

Motorola Moto G51 5G Advantages:

  • Lower Price Point: Likely to be more affordable, making it accessible to budget-conscious users.
  • Larger Battery: Slightly larger 5000mAh battery offers longer battery life.
  • Macro Lens: Dedicated macro lens allows for close-up photography.
  • Side-Mounted Fingerprint Scanner: Provides faster and more convenient access compared to a basic fingerprint scanner.
  • 2 Microphones: Has two microphones, perhaps to aid better voice recording and calls.

Trade-offs:

  • Oppo: Higher price point and slightly smaller battery. Lacks macro lens.
  • Motorola: Significantly less powerful, inferior display, basic camera system with no telephoto lens, much slower charging, and limited storage/RAM.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Pro is ideal for:

  • Power users: Individuals who demand high performance for gaming, video editing, and resource-intensive apps.
  • Multimedia enthusiasts: Those who value a high-quality display for watching videos, browsing photos, and enjoying immersive gaming experiences.
  • Photography and videography enthusiasts: Users who want a versatile camera system with great image quality, optical zoom, and 4K video recording.
  • Users who value premium features: Those who appreciate fast charging, wireless charging, ample storage, and advanced connectivity options.

Motorola Moto G51 5G is ideal for:

  • Budget-conscious users: Individuals who want a decent smartphone experience at an affordable price.
  • Users with basic needs: Those who primarily use their phones for communication, browsing, and casual social media use.
  • Users who prioritize battery life: Those who need a phone that can last all day on a single charge.
  • Users who need a macro lens: Users who do a lot of close-up photography.

4. Decision Framework

Key questions for buyers to consider:

  1. What is your budget? The Oppo will be significantly more expensive than the Motorola.
  2. How important is performance and display quality? The Oppo is far superior in both categories.
  3. What are your camera needs? The Oppo is much more capable if photo quality, zooming and video features are important.

Scenario-based recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: If you are a gamer or a power user who needs top-tier performance and a premium display, the Oppo Find X3 Pro is the clear winner.
  • Scenario 2: If you have a limited budget and your main priority is a long-lasting battery for basic tasks, the Motorola Moto G51 5G is a more budget-friendly choice.
  • Scenario 3: If you're looking for a balance of performance and features for everyday use, and do not require top of the range gaming or video, the Motorola Moto G51 5G is a better value proposition.

Personal Choice

If it were my choice, I would choose the Oppo Find X3 Pro. Whilst it is more expensive, the large difference in performance, display quality and camera features make it the better choice for me. The inclusion of wireless charging is also a significant bonus, and a feature that I make use of often. The faster processor will also make the phone feel more responsive and snappy, and will last me longer through app updates. Whilst the battery may not be quite as good as the Motorola, it will still be more than sufficient for a day of use with the 65W fast charging ensuring that if I do need a quick boost, I can do so fast.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.