Smartphone Comparison: Oppo Find X3 Pro vs. Motorola Moto G32
1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Oppo Find X3 Pro | Motorola Moto G32 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 163.6 × 74 × 8.3 mm | 161.8 × 73.8 × 8.5 mm | Oppo Find X3 Pro is slightly taller, Moto G32 is negligibly thicker |
| Weight | 193g | 184g | Moto G32 is slightly lighter, potentially more comfortable for extended use |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.7" | 6.5" | Oppo Find X3 Pro offers a slightly larger viewing area |
| Resolution | 1440x3216 | 1080x2400 | Oppo Find X3 Pro has a much sharper display with finer detail |
| Pixel Density | 525 PPI | 405 PPI | Oppo Find X3 Pro's display appears noticeably crisper and clearer |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | Oppo Find X3 Pro offers better colors, deeper blacks, and better energy efficiency |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 90Hz | Oppo Find X3 Pro provides smoother scrolling and animations |
| Brightness | 1300 nits | 0 nits | Oppo Find X3 Pro is vastly brighter, significantly better for outdoor visibility |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Oppo Find X3 Pro is much faster, handles demanding tasks and games better |
| AnTuTu Score | 876,500 | 249,000 | Oppo Find X3 Pro has vastly superior performance and is more future-proof |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 610 | Oppo Find X3 Pro handles graphics-intensive tasks, including gaming, more smoothly |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56" Sony IMX766, 1.00µm | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76" Samsung S5KJN1, 0.64µm | Oppo Find X3 Pro has a larger sensor, capturing more light and detail |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74" Sony IMX615, 0.80µm | 16MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm | Oppo Find X3 Pro has higher resolution, while Moto G32 has wider aperture for better low light |
| Telephoto Lens | 13MP, f/2.4, 1/3.4" Samsung S5K3M5, 1.00µm | Not present | Oppo Find X3 Pro offers optical zoom, improving image quality at a distance |
| Wide Angle Lens | 50MP, f/2.2, 1/1.56" Sony IMX766, 1.00µm | 8MP, f/2.0, 1.12µm | Oppo Find X3 Pro has significantly higher resolution wide-angle for more detail |
| Macro Lens | Not present | 2MP, f/2.4, 1.75µm | Moto G32 has a dedicated macro lens for close-up shots |
| Video | Up to 4K@60fps, EIS, HDR, slow-mo 480fps | Up to 1080p@30fps, slow-mo 120fps | Oppo Find X3 Pro records higher resolution video with better stabilization options |
| DXOMark Score (Mobile) | 128 | Not tested | Oppo Find X3 Pro is a superior camera phone based on professional testing |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | Moto G32 has a slightly larger battery for potentially longer usage |
| Charging | 65W fast charging | 30W fast charging | Oppo Find X3 Pro charges much faster |
| Wireless Charging | 30W wireless, reverse wireless | Not present | Oppo Find X3 Pro offers wireless charging and reverse wireless charging features |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 14) | Android 12 (upgradable to 13) | Moto G32 starts with newer OS but has one less major update |
| Connectivity | |||
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), MiMO | 802.11ac | Oppo Find X3 Pro supports faster and more efficient WiFi |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 with AptX, LDAC, SBC, AAC | 5.2 | Oppo Find X3 Pro has advanced audio codec support |
| GPS | More systems incl. dual band | Basic GPS | Oppo Find X3 Pro offers more precise location tracking |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 256/512GB | 64/128/256GB | Oppo Find X3 Pro has more internal storage options |
| RAM | 12/16GB | 4/6/8GB | Oppo Find X3 Pro offers significantly more RAM for smooth multitasking |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone allows expandable storage |
| Audio | |||
| Features | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphones | Motorola has dual microphones |
| Security | |||
| Features | basic fingerprint sensor | side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Moto G32 has more convenient side-mounted sensor |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Unknown | Oppo Find X3 Pro offers superior screen protection |
| Sensors | |||
| Sensors | Comprehensive suite incl. gyroscope | Comprehensive suite incl. gyroscope | Both have a similar range of sensors |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Oppo Find X3 Pro Advantages:
- Superior Display: AMOLED with higher resolution, pixel density, brightness, and 120Hz refresh rate provides a significantly better visual experience.
- Much Higher Performance: Snapdragon 888 5G chipset offers significantly faster processing and gaming capabilities.
- Advanced Camera System: Larger sensors, telephoto lens, higher resolution wide-angle lens, and better video recording capabilities.
- Faster Charging: 65W fast charging, wireless charging, and reverse wireless charging.
- Better WiFi and Audio: Supports Wi-Fi 6 and advanced Bluetooth audio codecs.
- More RAM and Storage Options: Higher RAM options and more storage with 512GB version.
- Superior Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 for increased durability
Motorola Moto G32 Advantages:
- Larger Battery: 5000mAh battery for potentially longer battery life.
- More Recent OS (at launch): Comes with Android 12.
- Macro Lens: Dedicated macro camera for detailed close-up shots.
- Slightly Lighter: Marginally lighter and may be more comfortable for long usage
- Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: A more convenient placement compared to the Oppo
- Dual Microphones: May provide slightly clearer audio in calls or video recording.
Trade-offs:
- Oppo Find X3 Pro sacrifices a bit of battery capacity for dramatically better display and performance.
- Motorola Moto G32 compromises on display quality, performance, and camera capabilities for better battery life and a lower price point.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Oppo Find X3 Pro:
- Ideal User: Power users, gamers, photographers, and those who prioritize display quality and performance.
- Use Cases:
- Demanding mobile games and applications
- High-resolution photo and video editing
- Watching high-definition videos with vibrant colors
- Heavy multitasking with multiple apps
- Users needing superior outdoor screen visibility
- Price-to-value: Better for those who can justify the higher price for premium features.
Motorola Moto G32:
- Ideal User: Budget-conscious users, those who value long battery life, and general users who don't require high-end performance.
- Use Cases:
- Daily tasks such as browsing, social media, and messaging
- Casual gaming
- Extended use without needing frequent charging
- Users needing a reliable and affordable phone
- Price-to-value: Provides good value for its price, prioritizing essential features and affordability.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions:
- What is my budget? The Oppo Find X3 Pro is expected to be significantly more expensive.
- How important are display quality and performance? If these are high priorities, the Oppo is the clear choice.
- How important is battery life? If battery life is paramount and performance is secondary, the Moto G32 might be a better fit.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Mobile Gaming Enthusiast
- Recommendation: Oppo Find X3 Pro. Its superior performance, display, and faster charging are essential.
- Scenario 2: Casual User on a Budget
- Recommendation: Motorola Moto G32. It provides adequate performance and longer battery life for daily use at a more affordable price.
- Scenario 3: Mobile Photographer
- Recommendation: Oppo Find X3 Pro. It has more versatile and higher quality camera system, along with advanced stabilization.
- Scenario 4: Frequent Traveler
- Recommendation: It depends. If you prioritise a great display and camera, the Oppo. If you need more battery life, the Moto.
My Choice
If I were choosing, I would select the Oppo Find X3 Pro. While the Motorola Moto G32 offers better battery life and a more affordable price, the Oppo's superior display quality, significantly faster performance, and more advanced camera system are more important to me personally. I value the premium experience and am willing to trade some battery capacity for a higher performing device. The ability to quickly charge with 65W helps negate the slightly smaller battery size. The 120hz AMOLED display and significantly better AnTuTu score are more impactful to my daily usage than the marginal battery increase.
