Oppo Find X3 Pro vs Motorola Edge 50 Neo - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 August 29, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 100.48 cm³ 88.87 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.47 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 193 g 171 g
Height 163.6 mm 154.1 mm
Width 74 mm 71.2 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • White
  • Gloss Black
  • Cosmic Mocha
  • Mars Edition
  • Photographer Edition
  • Nautical Blue
  • Latte
  • Grisaille
  • Poinciana

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.4 "
Resolution 1440 x 3216 1256 x 2760
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.2 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 525 PPI 474 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 100.25 mAh/in² 105.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.78 mAh/cm³ 48.5 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 4310 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 660 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 14 19

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProMotorola Edge 50 NeoPractical Impact
Launch Date2021-03-192024-08-29Motorola is significantly newer, likely to have more up-to-date software and features.
Dimensions163.6 × 74 × 8.3 mm154.1 × 71.2 × 8.1 mmOppo is larger and slightly thicker, which may be less comfortable for some users. Motorola is more compact, easier to handle.
Weight193g171gMotorola is 22g lighter, making it more comfortable to hold for long periods.
BuildGorilla Glass 5 (Screen)Gorilla Glass 3 (Screen)Oppo offers slightly better scratch and damage resistance on the display with Gorilla Glass 5.

Display

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProMotorola Edge 50 NeoPractical Impact
Size6.7"6.4"Oppo provides a slightly larger viewing area, which may be better for media consumption and multitasking.
Resolution1440x32161256x2760Oppo has a sharper, more detailed display with a significantly higher pixel count.
PPI525474Oppo has noticeably higher pixel density, resulting in crisper text and images.
TechnologyAMOLEDP-OLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. Differences are minimal for the average user.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations, making the user experience feel more fluid.
Brightness1300 nits3000 nitsMotorola's display is significantly brighter, making it much more visible in direct sunlight.

Performance

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProMotorola Edge 50 NeoPractical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 888 (5 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm)Oppo's chipset is older but higher performance, better for heavy gaming. Motorola's chipset is more energy-efficient.
AnTuTu Score876,500675,000Oppo offers significantly faster app loading, smoother multitasking, better gaming performance.
GPUAdreno 660Mali-G615 MC2Oppo is expected to perform better in graphics-intensive applications and games.

Camera

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProMotorola Edge 50 NeoPractical Impact
Standard Camera50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56", Sony IMX766, 1.00µm50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56", Sony LYT-700C, 1.00µmBoth have a similar main camera, expected to produce good images in various conditions.
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74", Sony IMX615, 0.80µm32MP, f/2.2Motorola's wider aperture should allow for better low-light selfies.
Telephoto Lens13MP, f/2.4, 1/3.4", Samsung S5K3M5, 1.00µm10MP, f/2.0Oppo offers more detail with a higher resolution, while Motorola has a brighter lens for better low-light zoom.
Wide Angle Lens50MP, f/2.2, 1/1.56", Sony IMX766, 1.00µmNot availableOppo has a dedicated wide-angle lens. Motorola is missing dedicated wide angle camera.
Wide Angle + Macro LensNot available13MP, f/2.2Motorola has a wide angle + macro lens. Oppo is missing a dedicated macro camera.
Video Recording4K@30/60fps with HDR & EIS, 1080p@30/60/240fps with HDR & EIS, Slow-motion: 480fps4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps with EIS, Slow-motion: 120fpsOppo has slightly more versatile video recording options, including higher slow-motion frame rates.
DXOMark Score128 (overall), 134 (photo), 125 (video)115 (overall), 118 (photo), 107 (video)Oppo offers significantly better photo and video quality based on DXOMark scores.
FeaturesQuadruple Camera, Digital Image Stabilization, OIS, Continuous Autofocus, Manual Focus, CDAF, RAWTriple Camera, Laser Autofocus (LAF)Oppo provides more options for advanced photographers (OIS, manual controls). Motorola includes laser autofocus which is good for fast focusing.

Battery

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProMotorola Edge 50 NeoPractical Impact
Capacity4500mAh4310mAhBoth have a similar battery capacity, providing comparable battery life under normal use.
Charging65W Fast Charging68W Fast ChargingMotorola has marginally faster wired charging.
Features30W Wireless, Reverse15W WirelessOppo offers faster wireless charging and reverse charging which are useful to charge accessories and other phones.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Pro Advantages:

  • Higher Resolution & PPI Display: Offers sharper visuals, ideal for detailed content viewing.
  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 888 chipset offers faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming.
  • Better Camera System: Wide Angle lens is available. Higher DXOMark scores indicate superior photo and video quality. Additional features like OIS, manual controls, and RAW capture enhance versatility.
  • Faster Wireless Charging: 30W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging for greater convenience.
  • More Advanced Bluetooth: Includes APT-x, LDAC, SBC, and AAC codecs.
  • More Accurate GPS: Supports more satellite systems.
  • More RAM options: Offers 16GB RAM for demanding multitasking.

Motorola Edge 50 Neo Advantages:

  • Newer Device: Newer software, design, and modern features.
  • Lighter & More Compact: Easier to handle and more pocketable.
  • Significantly Brighter Display: Much better visibility in direct sunlight.
  • Faster Wired Charging: Slightly faster wired charging.
  • Wider Aperture Selfie and Telephoto Cameras: Better low-light performance.
  • Wide Angle + Macro Camera: More versatile in the camera department.
  • eSIM Support: Offers eSIM functionality.
  • Newer WiFi Standard: WiFi 6E offers faster speeds, lower latency, better performance in crowded networks.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • Oppo: Older device with less impressive brightness and potentially less modern design.
  • Motorola: Lower performance, and weaker camera performance when compared to Oppo. Missing features like a dedicated wide-angle camera and OIS on the main camera.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Ideal User for Oppo Find X3 Pro:

  • Power Users & Gamers: Demanding users who prioritize performance, and need top of the line graphics and RAM for heavy apps and games.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who value image and video quality, more control over their camera, and want features like RAW capture and OIS.
  • Users Needing Wireless Charging: Ideal for those who want fast wireless charging and reverse charging.
  • Users Who Appreciate Advanced GPS: Suitable for outdoor enthusiasts who require accurate location tracking.

Ideal User for Motorola Edge 50 Neo:

  • Everyday Users: Users who prioritize comfort, a light design, and long battery life over extreme performance.
  • Outdoor Enthusiasts: Those who need a very bright screen for easy visibility in sunlight.
  • Users Seeking Modern Features: Those who appreciate a modern operating system, and eSIM functionality.
  • Users Who Value a Compact Phone: Those who prefer a lighter, smaller phone that is easier to carry in a pocket.
  • Users Who Value Newer Connectivity: Those who would benefit from WiFi 6E and newer WiFi standards.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Performance vs. Portability: Do you prioritize raw power and a larger screen, or a lighter, more compact device that's easy to handle?
  2. Camera Quality vs. Modern Features: Do you want the best image and video quality, or is a modern design, eSIM, and newer WiFi more important?
  3. Outdoor Usage vs. Indoor Usage: Will you frequently use your phone in bright sunlight, or mostly indoors?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Heavy Gaming & Photography:
    • Recommendation: Oppo Find X3 Pro. The superior performance, high resolution screen, and versatile camera system provide a better experience for gaming, photography, and other demanding applications.
  • Scenario 2: Everyday Use with Occasional Sun Exposure:
    • Recommendation: Motorola Edge 50 Neo. The lighter design, brighter screen, and newer features make it ideal for daily tasks, with good visibility for occasional outdoor use.
  • Scenario 3: Budget-Conscious User with Basic Needs:
    • Recommendation: Motorola Edge 50 Neo. If pricing is significantly lower, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo provides excellent value for its features and will handle daily tasks with ease.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would pick the Oppo Find X3 Pro. Despite being an older device, its performance is still noticeably better than the Motorola, and it provides a much better experience in both picture and video capture. I would prioritize this over the slightly newer features provided by the Motorola. While I do appreciate the brighter screen and more compact design of the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, the trade-off in performance and camera quality is too significant for my use case.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.