1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Oppo Find X3 Pro | Google Pixel Fold | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Form Factor | Standard | Foldable | The Pixel Fold offers a larger screen in a compact form when folded, more immersive experience when unfolded. The Find X3 Pro is a typical smartphone design. |
| Dimensions | 163.6 × 74 × 8.3 mm | 139.7 × 158.7 × 5.8 mm (unfolded) | Pixel Fold is significantly wider when unfolded, shorter when folded, and noticeably thinner than Find X3 Pro. Find X3 Pro is taller. Google Pixel Fold takes more space in a pocket when unfolded. |
| Weight | 193g | 283g | Find X3 Pro is much lighter, making it more comfortable for extended single-handed use. Pixel Fold’s weight is noticeable. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.7" | 7.6" | Pixel Fold provides a much larger screen real estate, offering more immersive media consumption and improved multitasking. |
| Resolution | 1440x3216 | 1840x2208 | Find X3 Pro has a slightly sharper display, but difference may not be noticeable in day-to-day use. |
| Pixel Density | 525 PPI | 378 PPI | Find X3 Pro's higher PPI translates to a sharper, more detailed display, particularly noticeable in fine text and images. |
| Technology | AMOLED | (Not Specified) | Find X3 Pro’s AMOLED offers better contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors. Pixel Fold’s tech is unknown. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Both phones offer smooth scrolling and animations. |
| Brightness | 1300 nits | 1500 nits | Pixel Fold will be more visible in direct sunlight. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 888 5G | Google Tensor G2 | Snapdragon 888 is slightly faster according to benchmarks, but both offer flagship performance. Pixel Fold benefits from Google's AI enhancements. |
| AnTuTu Score | 876,500 | 793,800 | Find X3 Pro shows marginally better raw performance in benchmarks. |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G710 MP7 | Different GPUs mean different optimization for games and graphics, both are powerful GPUs. |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56" sensor | 48MP, f/1.7 | Find X3 Pro offers slightly higher resolution, Pixel Fold has a wider aperture. Real-world performance will vary based on software and processing. |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74" sensor | 8MP, f/1.9 | Find X3 Pro has significantly higher resolution; Pixel Fold may perform better in low light due to wider aperture. |
| Telephoto Lens | 13MP, f/2.4 | 10.8MP, f/3.0 | Find X3 Pro has slightly higher resolution and wider aperture, better for zoom. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 50MP, f/2.2, 1/1.56" sensor | 10.8MP, f/2.2 | Find X3 Pro has significantly higher resolution for wide angle shots. |
| Video | Up to 4K 60fps, HDR, EIS | Up to 4K 60fps, HDR | Both offer similar video capabilities. |
| DxOMark Score | Main: 128; Photo: 134; Video: 125 | Main: 133; Photo: 137; Video: 131 | Pixel Fold performs better according to DxOMark benchmarks. |
| Camera Features | Quadruple camera, Manual focus, RAW | Triple camera, Laser AF, Face Unlock | The Find X3 Pro has more camera features, the Pixel Fold’s include Laser Autofocus and Face Unlock |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500 mAh | 4821 mAh | Pixel Fold has a slightly larger battery, which may result in slightly better battery life. |
| Charging | 65W Fast Charging | 30W Fast Charging | Find X3 Pro charges much faster. |
| Features | Wireless Charging, Reverse Charging | None | Find X3 Pro supports wireless and reverse wireless charging. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 14) | Android 13 (upgradable to 14) | Pixel Fold comes with newer Android version, but both will have Android 14 |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E | Pixel Fold has Wi-Fi 6E, meaning better speed and lower latency. |
| Bluetooth | 5.2, aptX, LDAC, SBC, AAC | 5.2 | Find X3 Pro has broader audio codec support for higher-quality audio. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo (L1+L5) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | Find X3 Pro supports more satellite bands for potentially better accuracy. |
| SIM | Dual Nano SIM | Nano SIM + eSIM | Pixel Fold supports eSIM, better for multiple phone numbers and international travel. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 256/512 GB | 256/512 GB | Both have similar storage options. |
| RAM | 12/16 GB | 12 GB | Find X3 Pro has optional 16GB RAM, better for heavy multitasking |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither phone has expandable storage. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers | Find X3 Pro offers Dolby Atmos. |
| Security | |||
| Features | Basic fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Pixel Fold has a more convenient side-mounted fingerprint sensor |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | Gorilla Glass Victus | Pixel Fold provides better protection against screen damage. |
| Sensors | |||
| Sensors | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Gravity, Pedometer | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Magnetometer, Barometer, Hall | Pixel Fold has additional sensors for more features. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Oppo Find X3 Pro Advantages:
- Lighter and More Comfortable: Significantly lighter for one-handed use over long durations.
- Faster Charging: 65W fast charging is much quicker than the Pixel Fold's 30W.
- Better Display Sharpness: Higher pixel density (525 PPI) results in a noticeably sharper display.
- Enhanced Audio Features: Dolby Atmos offers better audio quality and surround sound effects.
- More Camera Features: Offers RAW capture, manual focus and a quadruple camera setup.
- More RAM: The option for 16 GB RAM offers better multitasking.
Wider Audio Codec Support: Find X3 Pro has broader audio codec support for higher-quality audio
Practical Implications: Ideal for users who prioritize comfort, fast charging, and high-quality audio, and prefer a traditional smartphone form factor.
Google Pixel Fold Advantages:
- Larger Foldable Display: The 7.6" foldable screen provides a much larger display for immersive media consumption, gaming, and multitasking.
- Brighter Display: 1500 nits brightness provides better visibility in bright sunlight.
- Superior Camera Performance: Better DxOMark scores in both photo and video indicate better image processing and overall camera quality.
- eSIM Support: Provides flexibility for managing multiple phone numbers and global travel.
- Newer Wi-Fi Standard: Wi-Fi 6E offers faster speeds, lower latency, better performance in crowded networks, access to 6GHz band, reduced interference.
- Side-mounted Fingerprint: More convenient access than basic sensor in Find X3 Pro.
- Gorilla Glass Victus: Better screen protection against drops and scratches.
- Newer OS: Comes with Android 13 for newer features.
Additional Sensors: Barometer and Magnetometer for enhanced functionality.
Practical Implications: Ideal for users who prioritize a large display, superior camera quality, modern features and a foldable design.
Significant Trade-offs:
- Find X3 Pro: Lacks the foldable design, larger screen, eSIM, and the latest OS.
- Pixel Fold: Significantly heavier, slower charging, and the smaller front screen can feel less practical.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Oppo Find X3 Pro:
- Ideal User: Someone who prioritizes a lightweight, easy-to-handle phone with fast charging and excellent audio. Good for those not interested in foldable phones.
- Use Cases:
- Daily mobile use, calls, messaging, social media browsing.
- Gaming, due to higher RAM and slightly better performance.
- Music and video lovers who appreciate high quality audio and a great display.
- Users who need quick charging on the go.
Google Pixel Fold:
- Ideal User: Someone who values a large, immersive display and superior camera quality, also looking to experience a cutting-edge foldable design.
- Use Cases:
- Multitasking between apps.
- Video editing and photo management.
- Tablet-like experience for reading and browsing.
- Users who need a professional-grade camera.
- International travelers.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions:
- Do you prefer a standard smartphone or a foldable design? This will greatly influence your choice.
- How important is fast charging and lightweight design to you? Find X3 Pro is superior in these aspects.
- How important is display size versus image quality? Pixel Fold has larger screen but Find X3 Pro has higher PPI.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- If you need a comfortable and easily usable smartphone for daily tasks with fast charging, choose the Oppo Find X3 Pro.
- If you want a large screen for immersive content consumption and superior camera performance and a foldable form factor, choose the Google Pixel Fold.
- If you require advanced camera features and you don't like foldable phones, choose Oppo Find X3 Pro
My Choice
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would pick the Google Pixel Fold.
While the Oppo Find X3 Pro is a very capable device with its lightweight design, faster charging, and sharper display, the Pixel Fold’s foldable design, larger screen, and superior camera are more compelling for my use case. I often work on the go, and the larger display on the Pixel Fold would greatly improve my productivity by allowing me to manage multiple apps simultaneously, read documents, and watch videos more comfortably. Additionally, the Pixel Fold's better DxOMark scores are important since I use my phone camera extensively for both work and personal life. Despite the heavier design and slower charging, the benefits of the Pixel Fold's larger screen, superior camera, and eSIM outweigh those drawbacks for my specific needs. The Fold also represents a newer more innovative approach to smartphones, offering the functionality of both a smartphone and a small tablet. I value innovation and the functionality of a large screen that folds into a pocketable form factor.
