Oppo Find X3 Pro vs Asus ROG Phone 5 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 April 26, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 100.48 cm³ 137.58 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.47 "/g 2.85 "/g
Weight 193 g 238 g
Height 163.6 mm 172.8 mm
Width 74 mm 77.3 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 10.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • White
  • Gloss Black
  • Cosmic Mocha
  • Mars Edition
  • Photographer Edition
  • Phantom Black
  • Storm White

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1440 x 3216 1080 x 2448
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.2 % 82 %
Pixel Density 525 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits 800 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 100.25 mAh/in² 130.52 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.78 mAh/cm³ 43.61 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 660 Adreno 660

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 3.1
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, Accessory Connector

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 14 12

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the Oppo Find X3 Pro and Asus ROG Phone 5, focusing on practical implications:

Design

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProAsus ROG Phone 5Practical Impact
Dimensions163.6 × 74 × 8.3 mm172.8 × 77.3 × 10.3 mmROG Phone 5 is noticeably larger and thicker, less pocketable. X3 Pro is slimmer and easier to handle.
Weight193g238gX3 Pro is significantly lighter, making it more comfortable for prolonged use. ROG Phone 5 feels heavier.
BuildNo specified build materials, both feel premium.
Screen ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass 6ROG Phone 5's screen has slightly better scratch resistance than the X3 Pro.
FoldableStandardStandardBoth are traditional phones, not foldable.

Display

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProAsus ROG Phone 5Practical Impact
Size6.7"6.78"Negligible difference in screen size.
Resolution1440x32161080x2448X3 Pro offers a much sharper and more detailed display due to its higher resolution.
PPI525395X3 Pro has higher pixel density resulting in sharper images, text, and better visual clarity.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks typical of AMOLED displays.
Refresh Rate120Hz144HzROG Phone 5 has a slightly smoother display, which may be noticeable in fast-paced content and gaming, but the difference may be minimal for most users.
Brightness1300 nits0 nitsX3 Pro's higher brightness ensures better outdoor visibility in direct sunlight, which is crucial in bright conditions. The 0 nits on the ROG Phone 5 means this spec is not specified.

Performance

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProAsus ROG Phone 5Practical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)Both offer similar high-end performance.
Antutu Score876,500883,000Real-world performance is nearly identical. Both handle demanding apps and games smoothly.
GPUAdreno 660Adreno 660Identical graphics performance, enabling smooth gaming at high settings.

Camera

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProAsus ROG Phone 5Practical Impact
Main Camera Resolution50MP64MPROG Phone 5 has slightly higher resolution, but the difference in detail might not be significant.
Main Camera Sensor Size1/1.56"1/1.7"X3 Pro's larger sensor may capture more light and detail in low-light conditions.
Selfie Camera Resolution32MP24MPX3 Pro captures higher-resolution selfies, useful for cropping and editing.
Selfie Camera Sensor Size1/2.74"1/2.8"X3 Pro's sensor is slightly larger, potentially better low-light selfies.
Telephoto LensYesNoX3 Pro offers optical zoom capabilities, useful for capturing distant subjects, which is a huge difference for photographers.
Wide-Angle Lens50MP, f/2.213MP, f/2.5X3 Pro's wide-angle camera has superior resolution and aperture.
Macro LensNo5MP, f/2.0ROG Phone 5 has a dedicated macro lens, useful for extreme close-up shots, while X3 Pro lacks a dedicated macro lens.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@60fps with HDR, EISUp to 8K@30fps with EISROG Phone 5 supports 8K video, which is crucial for professional-grade video content.
Camera FeaturesOIS, Quad CameraNight Mode, Triple CameraX3 Pro has OIS for better image stabilization, Quad camera for versatility, ROG has Night Mode for low-light captures.
DXO MarkMain Score 128, Photo Score 134, Video Score 125Not AvailableX3 Pro's camera is validated as high-performing by DxoMark.

Battery

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProAsus ROG Phone 5Practical Impact
Capacity4500mAh6000mAhROG Phone 5 offers significantly longer battery life due to its larger capacity.
Charging Speed65W65WBoth support fast charging, reducing charging times.
FeaturesWireless, Reverse, Reverse WirelessBypass Charging, ReverseX3 Pro has Wireless charging. ROG Phone 5 has bypass charging, which allows users to power the device directly without charging the battery.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Display: Higher resolution and pixel density result in a sharper and more detailed viewing experience. Higher brightness also allows better outdoor visibility.
  • Versatile Camera System: Includes a dedicated telephoto lens for zoom capabilities, a higher-resolution wide-angle camera, and features like OIS. Higher DxOmark scores demonstrate the quality.
  • Wireless Charging: Offers the convenience of wireless charging and reverse wireless charging.
  • Lighter & Slimmer: More comfortable to carry and handle for extended use, which is beneficial in daily use.
  • Better OS Support: Android 11 with the ability to upgrade to Android 14, while ROG Phone 5 only goes up to Android 12.

Asus ROG Phone 5 Advantages:

  • Significantly Larger Battery: Provides much longer battery life, ideal for heavy users and gamers who need extended use without frequent charging.
  • Higher Refresh Rate: 144Hz screen offers a slightly smoother experience, which is beneficial for gaming.
  • Macro Lens: Offers a dedicated macro lens for close-up photography, which X3 Pro lacks.
  • Superior Audio: DTS / DTS X, Hi-Res Audio, Noise cancellation microphone.
  • 8K Video Recording: Enables high-resolution video recording for professional use.
  • Bypass Charging: Can power device directly from charger without charging the battery, for long gameplay.

Trade-offs:

  • The Oppo Find X3 Pro sacrifices battery life for a lighter and slimmer design, as well as wireless charging.
  • The Asus ROG Phone 5 is larger and heavier but provides superior battery life. It lacks a dedicated telephoto lens and wireless charging features.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Pro Ideal User:

  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who prioritize camera quality, zoom capabilities, and versatile photography options.
  • Content Consumers: Users who value a sharp, high-resolution display with excellent outdoor visibility.
  • Design-Conscious Users: Those who prefer a sleek, lightweight phone that is comfortable to handle.
  • General Users: People who want a great all-round experience, who prefer a premium feel and sleek design

Use Cases:

  • Taking high-quality photos and videos in various scenarios.
  • Watching movies and videos with sharp visuals.
  • Daily use, where handling is important.

Asus ROG Phone 5 Ideal User:

  • Mobile Gamers: Users who require long battery life, a smooth display, and high performance for demanding games.
  • Heavy Users: Users who need extended battery life and don't mind a larger device.
  • Multimedia Creators: Users who need 8K video recording capabilities and advanced audio.
  • Power Users: People who frequently use their phones for a variety of tasks and require extended battery life.

Use Cases:

  • Playing graphically intensive games for long periods.
  • Recording high-resolution videos.
  • Heavy multitasking and usage.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Consider:

  1. Battery Life vs. Portability: Do you prioritize long battery life, or do you prefer a lighter, slimmer device?
  2. Camera Versatility vs. Macro: Is a telephoto lens for zoom more important, or do you need a dedicated macro lens for close-ups?
  3. Display Sharpness vs. Smoother Refresh: Do you want the absolute sharpest screen possible, or is the 144Hz refresh rate from the Asus more beneficial?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Travel Photographer: The Oppo Find X3 Pro is better due to its telephoto lens, higher-quality wide-angle camera, wireless charging capabilities, and better screen.
  • Competitive Gamer: The Asus ROG Phone 5 is a better option due to the extended battery, higher refresh rate, and bypass charging, even if it means a slightly heavier device.
  • Daily User: The Oppo Find X3 Pro might be a better option due to its sleek design and powerful camera, though battery life will be less than ROG Phone 5.
  • Professional Videographer: The Asus ROG Phone 5 is preferred due to its 8K video and robust audio features.

My Choice

I would choose the Oppo Find X3 Pro. While the Asus ROG Phone 5 has some impressive features, particularly its huge battery and 144Hz screen, I value the combination of the X3 Pro's superior display, more versatile camera system with its telephoto lens, wireless charging, and lighter form factor. The higher resolution screen and better overall photography capabilities are more in line with my daily needs and preferences. While the battery is smaller, for my typical usage, the battery is more than adequate. I do not need a macro lens. Therefore, the Oppo Find X3 Pro aligns more with my lifestyle and usage patterns, making it the preferred choice despite not having the best battery.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.