Oppo Find X3 Neo vs ZTE Blade V60 Design - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 June 1, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 92.74 cm³ 106.33 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.56 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 184 g 198 g
Height 159.9 mm 164.2 mm
Width 72.5 mm 75.3 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Galactic Silver
  • Starlight Black
  • Champagne Gold
  • Dark Blue
  • Sunrise Violet

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.3 % 84.6 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1100 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.89 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.52 mAh/cm³ 47.02 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the Oppo Find X3 Neo and ZTE Blade V60 Design, focusing on practical implications:

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoZTE Blade V60 DesignPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions159.9 × 72.5 × 8 mm164.2 × 75.3 × 8.6 mmThe ZTE is noticeably taller, wider, and slightly thicker. The Oppo will feel more compact and potentially easier to handle.
Weight184g198gOppo is lighter, making it more comfortable for long holding times. The 14g difference is noticeable.
Display
Size6.55"6.6"Both have similar screen sizes, a negligible difference in practical use.
Resolution1080x2400720x1612Oppo's higher resolution results in a much sharper display, noticeable with text and detailed images.
Pixel Density (PPI)402267The Oppo's screen is significantly sharper. Text and images will be crisper, more defined, and higher quality.
TechnologyAMOLEDIPS LCDOppo's AMOLED provides much better contrast, deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and is more efficient with dark themes. Better experience overall.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations. 90Hz is a good baseline for fluidity.
Brightness1100 nits0 nitsOppo is much better for outdoor use in bright sunlight. The ZTE likely has very low brightness and would not be visible under the sun.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 865 5GUnisoc T606Oppo's chipset is significantly more powerful, translating to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming.
Antutu Score743,500240,000Oppo delivers much higher performance, meaning smoother performance, faster loading and responsiveness.
GPUAdreno 650Mali-G57 MP1Oppo offers a much better gaming experience due to a more powerful GPU.
Battery
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhZTE's larger battery should provide longer battery life, but real-world endurance also depends on other factors like chipset efficiency.
Charging65W Fast Charging22.5W Fast ChargingOppo charges much faster, useful for quick top-ups. Significantly faster.
FeaturesReverse ChargingNo reverse chargingOppo can act as a power bank for other devices.
Camera
Standard Camera50MP, f/1.8, Sony IMX76650MP, f/1.8, unknown sensorOppo has a known good sensor (Sony IMX766), but it is not possible to fully compare without sensor details on the ZTE.
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.4, Sony IMX6158MP, unknown sensorOppo takes much higher resolution selfies, meaning much better quality pictures. The ZTE has a very basic selfie camera.
Telephoto Lens13MPNoneOppo offers optical zoom capabilities for capturing distant subjects without loss in quality. The ZTE does not offer that functionality.
Wide Angle Lens16MPNoneOppo offers the possibility to capture wider scenes, adding flexibility to the camera.
Portrait LensNone2MPZTE provides additional depth information for portrait shots. The Oppo doesn't have that feature but has a better overall camera system.
Macro Lens2MPNoneOppo offers the possibility to take very close-up shots. The ZTE does not offer that functionality.
Video Recording4K@60fps with HDR, EIS1080p@30fpsOppo offers much higher quality video recording, including 4K at 60fps. The ZTE is very basic in video capabilities.
DXOMark Scores106 (Mobile)Not TestedOppo has good benchmarked camera performance; ZTE hasn't been tested, but is unlikely to match the quality of Oppo.
Software
OSAndroid 11, max 12Android 13ZTE has a newer operating system, offering newer features, and it will have longer software support.
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 5Oppo supports a newer Wi-Fi standard for better speed and reliability.
BluetoothBluetooth 5.1 with aptX, LDACBluetooth 5.0Oppo supports higher-quality Bluetooth audio codecs.
GPSQZSSNo QZSSOppo offers more accurate GPS due to more satellite systems support.
Storage
Internal Storage128/256 GB256 GBBoth phones offer ample storage, however, the Oppo comes in two variants and the ZTE is only available in one variant.
RAM12 GB4/6 GBOppo offers more RAM, leading to much better multitasking performance.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone supports expandable storage, so the built-in storage is the only storage available.
Audio
Audio QualityHi-Res Audio, Stereo SpeakersDTS / DTS XOppo has superior audio hardware, offering higher quality audio playback and immersion; ZTE offers a different processing technology.
Security
FeaturesBasic Fingerprint SensorSide-mounted Fingerprint SensorZTE has a more advanced sensor, potentially more convenient and faster.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5UnknownOppo offers much more resistant screen protection against scratches and damages.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED panel with higher resolution, brightness, and pixel density leading to a sharper, more vibrant viewing experience.
  • Much Higher Performance: Snapdragon 865 chipset offers significantly better performance, smoother multitasking, and better gaming.
  • Better Camera System: Multiple lenses (telephoto, wide-angle, macro), higher resolution selfie camera, and 4K video recording capabilities.
  • Faster Charging: 65W fast charging significantly reduces charging times.
  • Advanced Audio: High-Resolution Audio and stereo speakers.
  • Better Build Quality: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 screen protection.
  • Advanced Connectivity: Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.1 with aptX, LDAC, more accurate GPS thanks to QZSS

Practical Implications: The Oppo Find X3 Neo is much faster, offers better visual and camera experiences, and charges faster. It excels in demanding tasks and media consumption.

ZTE Blade V60 Design Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: 500mAh additional battery capacity may translate to slightly longer battery life.
  • Newer OS: Ships with Android 13, offering the latest software features, although there is no maximum version available.
  • Side Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: A more advanced and potentially more convenient fingerprint sensor.
  • Portrait mode: Offers an additional portrait lens for depth information.

Practical Implications: The ZTE Blade V60 Design might have slightly longer battery life and more recent software at launch, although it sacrifices performance, camera quality, and display quality to do so.

Trade-offs:

  • Oppo: Sacrifices battery capacity for a much better display, performance and camera experience.
  • ZTE: Sacrifices display quality, performance, and camera versatility for a marginally larger battery and newer OS.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Neo:

  • Ideal Users: Power users, gamers, photography enthusiasts, media consumers.
  • Use Cases: Mobile gaming, video editing, content creation, high-quality photo and video capture, watching movies, social media, and intensive multitasking.
  • Price-to-Value: If budget allows, it provides premium features at a great value for its performance and quality.

ZTE Blade V60 Design:

  • Ideal Users: Budget-conscious users, those prioritizing battery life, basic smartphone users
  • Use Cases: Basic daily tasks, browsing, social media, calls, texting, and light app usage.
  • Price-to-Value: A good option for those seeking an inexpensive smartphone for basic functions.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Consider:

  1. What is your budget? The Oppo is likely more expensive than the ZTE given the premium features it offers.
  2. How important is performance and display quality to you? If performance and a high-quality display are crucial, the Oppo is the clear winner.
  3. Do you need long battery life or fast charging? If battery life is the absolute priority, the ZTE has a slight advantage, but the Oppo’s fast charging is far superior.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1 (Budget-Focused): If you primarily need a functional smartphone for basic tasks and want to save money, the ZTE is the more logical option.
  • Scenario 2 (Performance-Focused): If you need a device that can handle demanding tasks, games, and offer a great media experience, the Oppo is the far superior choice.
  • Scenario 3 (Camera Enthusiast): If you care about high-quality photos and videos, the Oppo has a much more versatile and better camera system.

My Choice

I would choose the Oppo Find X3 Neo. The vastly superior display, performance, and camera system make it a much more compelling overall package. While the ZTE Blade V60 Design has a larger battery, the Oppo’s 65W fast charging minimizes the real-world impact of its slightly smaller battery capacity. The difference in performance, screen quality, and camera capabilities is far more important for my needs than a slightly longer battery life. While the price might be higher, the value proposition is much better due to the higher quality components.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.